LLY gets shocking (!!??) court decision

SAVE AS FAVORITE

VIEW FAVORITES

By Virginia Simson (about the author) Page 3 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com Permalink

To my mind, what was shocking was to write to the NYT during their series on diabetes (their cause of last year) to inform that they were missing the OBVIOUS.

The cases of advanced diabetes were in those taking antipsychotics for depression - it wasn't the lack of nearby grocery stores and/or poor eating habits, as they so boldly contended. Patients BECAME psychotic and incapable of self care AFTER their new prescriptions were in place.

Now that the NYT has finally seen the light, it wasn't too long before the legal "pro"fession began to really act up about the zyprexa metabolic issue (still overlooking the heart effects issue, imho; it's still under the radar).

But where o where! are the articles about who prescribed this stuff?

Why isn't that shocking to the NYT and other media outlets?

As is now OBVIOUS, a bunch of oblivious doctors, Lilly sales staff, lawyers and marketers worked long and hard to ensure a quality of life for themselves they did not want their "patients" to enjoy. The FDA stood "patiently" by.

So the Court has finally stood up and ruled that all this misapplication must cease. I would be shocked IF they had ruled any other way. And I will be shocked if MORE lawsuits are not filed. Soon. Right away.

Please consider writing long and hard until every last body is free of the scourage of this drug.

1 | 2 | 3

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Time to start regulating the FDA regulators in the PUBLIC interest

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Virginia Simson is a spiritual journalista/activist who runs a visionary planetary tutorial blogspot, www.ladybroadoak.blogspot.com as well as a blog on the uranium industry and depleted uranium at (more...)

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.