Meanwhile, al-Qaeda was preparing precisely that kind of attack.
"In February 2001, a source reported that an individual whom he identified as the big instructor (probably a reference to bin Laden) complained frequently that the United States had not yet attacked. According to the source, bin Laden wanted the United States to attack, and if it did not he would launch something bigger," the 9/11 Commission wrote,
By early summer 2001, as 19 al-Qaeda operatives positioned themselves inside the United States, U.S. intelligence analysts picked up more evidence of al-Qaeda's plans by sifting through the "chatter" of electronic intercepts. The U.S. warning system was "blinking red."
Over the July Fourth 2001 holiday, a well-placed U.S. intelligence source passed on a disturbing piece of information to then-New York Times reporter Judith Miller, who later recounted the incident in an interview with Alternet.
"The person told me that there was some concern about an intercept that had been picked up," Miller said. "The incident that had gotten everyone's attention was a conversation between two members of al-Qaeda. And they had been talking to one another, supposedly expressing disappointment that the United States had not chosen to retaliate more seriously against what had happened to the Cole.
"And one al-Qaeda operative was overheard saying to the other, 'Don't worry; we're planning something so big now that the U.S. will have to respond.'"
In the Alternet interview, published in May 2006 after Miller resigned from the Times, the reporter expressed regret that she had not been able to nail down enough details about the intercept to get the story into the newspaper.
But the significance of her recollection is that more than two months before the 9/11 attacks, the CIA knew that al-Qaeda was planning a major attack with the intent of provoking a U.S. military reaction – or in this case, an overreaction.
Unheeded Warning
The CIA tried to warn Bush about the threat with the hope that presidential action could energize government agencies and head off the attack. On Aug. 6, 2001, the CIA sent analysts to Bush's ranch in Crawford, Texas, to brief him and deliver a report entitled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US."
Bush was not pleased by the intrusion. He glared at the CIA briefer and snapped, "All right, you've covered your ass," according to Suskind's book.
Then, ordering no special response, Bush returned to a vacation of fishing, clearing brush and working on a speech about stem-cell research.
For its part, al-Qaeda was running a risk that the United States might strike a precise and devastating blow against the terrorist organization, eliminating it as an effective force without alienating much of the Muslim world.
If that happened, the cause of Islamic extremism could have been set back years, without eliciting much sympathy from most Muslims for a band of killers who wantonly murdered innocent civilians.
After the 9/11 attacks, al-Qaeda's gamble almost failed as the CIA, backed by U.S. Special Forces, ousted bin Laden's Taliban allies in Afghanistan and cornered much of the al-Qaeda leadership in the mountains of Tora Bora near the Pakistani border.
Osama has to love Bush. Either Osama is a genius or Bush is a ranting idiot. Since I do not believe Osama to be particularly bright, the conclusion has to be that Bush has stupidly helped Osama achieve objects that were otherwise beyond the capability of al Qaeda. Nor can there be any doubt that Osama wants a bunch of American religious right fanatics rising to Osama's call for jihad. Osama called for jihad and Bush and possee have answered as faithfully as Pavlov's dogs to the sound of the dinner bell.
by
Richard Mathis (127 articles, 103 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 121 comments)
on Friday, August 11, 2006 at 7:35:35 PM
All goes to prove that bin Laden knows the neocons are far stupider than the Democrats. Bush has created more terrorists in 5 years than bin Laden could have in 50. But what does Bush care. He has ridden the terrorist card all the way to a second undeserved term. And the world suffers.
You mean the extremely naive and gullible Bush could be lured into an al Qaeda trap? Figure that. "Fool me once ...." A fool and his war toys are a lethal combination - especially for civilians.
by
skyreader7 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 182 comments)
on Saturday, August 12, 2006 at 8:13:31 AM
