Tags for This Article:

Impeachment (3157)  Bush Reasons To Dump Impeach (1886)  Corruption (1763)  Cheney Dick (721)  Conyers-John (162) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
July 2, 2007 at 08:56:44

Unimpeachably Impeachable

by Ray McGovern     Page 3 of 5 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

The so-called “family jewels” released by the CIA last week provide insight into the corrosive effect of folks like Casey and Addington on the professionalism and integrity of those working in the Office of General Counsel.

To be sure, there were liberties taken with law and regulation before Casey, but before Casey and Addington there was also high sensitivity to observing the letter of the law regarding surveillance of Americans. One sees in the correspondence reflections of the ethos of the lawyers I encountered during my 27-year Agency career.

There were abuses like illegal wiretaps, despite admonitions from directors like William Colby against monitoring American citizens. But the correspondence is replete with examples of operations abruptly shut down after an OGC determination that they violated CIA statutory responsibilities.

The documents show, for example, OGC putting the kibosh on radio intercepts made from abroad, but with one terminal in the U.S. Well before the FISA law, Agency officials were particularly uncomfortable with widespread electronic surveillance of American citizens.

As national security blogger Noah Shachtman has noted, it is clear from the “family jewels” material that many in the leadership of the Nixon-era intelligence community were relatively successful in avoiding becoming drawn into the kind of comprehensive, intrusive electronic eavesdropping that would later become a hallmark of the George W. Bush-era intelligence community.

CIA Director Michael Hayden’s timing in releasing the “family jewels” begs interpretation. Without any sense of irony, Hayden told CIA staffers that internal reforms and increased oversight have given the CIA “a far stronger place in our democratic system.” Right.

The post-9/11 warrantless electronic surveillance program he devised as head of NSA, at the direction of Cheney and the president tears that claim to shreds.

Martinet

Hayden’s followed illegal orders to create an aggressive NSA program skirting strict 30-year old legal restrictions on eavesdropping on American citizens. As NSA director from 1999 to 2005, Hayden did the White House’s bidding in devising and implementing that program without adequately informing Congress—as required by law.

When an unauthorized disclosure revealed the program to the press, Hayden agreed to play point man with smoke and mirrors. Small wonder that the White House later deemed him the perfect man to head the CIA.

Hayden, of course, evidences no outward embarrassment. A whiff of conscience showed through his nomination hearing, though, when he flubbed the answer to a soft-pitch from administration loyalist, Sen. Kit Bond, R-Missouri:

“Did you believe that your primary responsibility as director of NSA was to execute a program that your NSA lawyers, the Justice Department lawyers, and White House officials all told you was legal and that you were ordered to carry it out by the president of the United States?”

Instead of the simple “Yes” that was anticipated, Hayden paused and spoke rather poignantly—and revealingly:

“I had to make this personal decision in early October 2001, and it was a personal decision...I could not not do this.”

Why should it be such an enormous personal decision whether or not to obey a White House order? No one asked Hayden, but it requires no particular acuity to figure it out.

This is a military officer who had indoctrinated NSA employees with what used to be known as NSA’s “First Commandment”—Thou Shalt Not Eavesdrop on U.S. Citizens; an officer who, like the rest of us, had sworn to defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; a military man well aware one must never obey an unlawful order.

 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, the publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in Washington, DC. During his 27-years as a CIA analyst, he chaired NIEs: he is now on the Steering Group of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 comments

Charlie Levenson is a writer and activist in Portland, Oregon. In addition to serving as the Manager of Electronic Communications for a social/athletic club in Portland, he instructs in Digital Media at Portland State University, consults on communications strategy, and occasionally writes/directs videos.
Charlie LCharlie Levenson is a writer and activist in Portland, Oregon. In addition to serving as the Manager of Electronic Communications for a social/athletic club in Portland, he instructs in Digital Media at Portland State University, consults on communications strategy, and occasionally writes/directs videos.

H. Res 333

So, my Congressional Representative is a middle-of-the-road-but-thinks-he's-liberal Democrat in a very progressive state (OR-3, Blumenauer) who is dragging his feet on co-sponsoring H. Res 333 to IMPEACH CHENEY (first).

I'm going to be working to build up pressure within his district (after all, ALL POLITICS IS LOCAL!) to force him to co-sponsor.  WHY I should have to waste my valuable energy to push a supposedly DEMOCRATIC congressman towards what he should already be doing is beyond me, but hey, I guess that's what I have to do.

Where does YOUR Congressional Rep stand on H. Res 333 ? 

Obviously, if you have a Rethuglican rep, your best shot is to start lining up an opponent NOW who can speak out in favor of H. Res 333 and help to spotlight the Rethuglican's decision to choose PARTY over COUNTRY.

If you have a hold-back Democrat rep (like me) then all you can do is call and call and call.  Call their office.  Call your friends (and ask THEM to call the Rep's office).  Call everybody together to have an "impeachment party" and put pressure on the Democrats to DO THE RIGHT THING.

And, I guess if they won't, then we must elect third party candidates who are willing to caucus with the Dems but will begin to form a strong enough coalition as to have some power.  Also, they will be moving a slow-to-act-progressive Dem out of the way.  IT'S OUR COUNTRY, AND WE WANT IT BACK!!!

by Charlie L (2 articles, 3 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 674 comments) on Monday, July 2, 2007 at 2:29:39 PM
 


Mr. Bohne is a clockmaker and activist. He HATES the US Government, and without stretching the truth (reality) will do anything to dig up dirt on any of these bastards, as long as it's REAL dirt.

"the first man to raise his fists, is the first man to run out of ideas."

tedbohneMr. Bohne is a clockmaker and activist. He HATES the US Government, and without stretching the truth (reality) will do anything to dig up dirt on any of these bastards, as long as it's REAL dirt.

"the first man to raise his fists, is the first man to run out of ideas."

"H. Res 333"

You halfwit.  you demonstrate unbridled stupidity by suggesting you have an "elected representative."  Waddya gonna do?  Write the cocksucker.  It's the system stupid, it's dead.  Write anyone you want, write god.  You get just as much of a response.

 

ted

by tedbohne (87 articles, 103 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 119 comments) on Monday, July 2, 2007 at 5:54:55 PM
 


Currently I'm a cartoonist and contributing writer for The New Orleans Levee. For those wishing to view my work you can see my latest at: nolvee.com
Mr MCurrently I'm a cartoonist and contributing writer for The New Orleans Levee. For those wishing to view my work you can see my latest at: nolvee.com

What are we waiting for?

Mr. Ray McGovern is what one would hope would be the kind of individuals we would have working in public service.

Indeed, why has Rep. Coyners craw-fished on impeachment. One may understand keeping your mouth shut before the election so as not to seem to be butting heads with Pelosi's stupid statement, but with the continued abuses going on, it's not like bush&co stopped committing their crimes just because more people showed-up to vote than even they erase. I truly believe that if they are allowed to follow through on their plans that there may be no 08' elections or if there are they'd be so compromised that bush & cheney could run again and win.

I don't know what they have on Conyer but it has to be something that would put it before his country and his honor.

by Mr M (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 12 diaries, 1428 comments) on Monday, July 2, 2007 at 3:23:09 PM
 


Been around the block a few times.
Blue PilgrimBeen around the block a few times.

I have read

that Pelosi threatened to fire him from his position on the juduciary committee if he pursued impeachment.

by Blue Pilgrim (0 articles, 3 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 997 comments) on Monday, July 2, 2007 at 3:41:18 PM
 


Mr. Bohne is a clockmaker and activist. He HATES the US Government, and without stretching the truth (reality) will do anything to dig up dirt on any of these bastards, as long as it's REAL dirt.

"the first man to raise his fists, is the first man to run out of ideas."

tedbohneMr. Bohne is a clockmaker and activist. He HATES the US Government, and without stretching the truth (reality) will do anything to dig up dirt on any of these bastards, as long as it's REAL dirt.

"the first man to raise his fists, is the first man to run out of ideas."

"Unimpeachably Impeachable"

With GREAT respect.  GODDAMNIT RAY!, the bastard was never elected!!  We know who, when, and how.  It all starts there, and if anyone wants to do something, then these bastards must be killed.  Or given ONE chance to surrender to custody. 

 

ted

by tedbohne (87 articles, 103 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 119 comments) on Monday, July 2, 2007 at 5:48:48 PM
 


I swallowed the red pill!
HanI swallowed the red pill!

Not so fast...

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_daniel_g_070628_why_not_assassinate_3f.htm

by Han (0 articles, 2 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 196 comments) on Monday, July 2, 2007 at 8:03:57 PM
 

 

8 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

BARACK OBAMA On Gandhi's Birthday by Stephen Fox

The dangerous McCain/Palin character assassination of Obama by Sherman Yellen

PECK, PECK... SQUAWK! by Rip Rense

Sarah Palin; Secessionist-- powerful new Youtube Video by youtube

Obama Must Appoint a Consumer Protectionist as FDA Commissioner by Stephen Fox

Naomi Wolf Must Watch Video: A Coup Took Place on October 1, 2008 by youtube

Sarah Palin Broke The Ethics Law In Alaska, And Can Be Impeached by Rev. Bill McGinnis

A Solution? by Paul Craig Roberts

Northern Exposure: Sarah Palin's Toxic Paradise Posted by Rady Ananda

FEMA Official States Bush Is Planning To Implement Martial Law by William Cormier

Go To Top 50 Most Popular