Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (6 comments)

HR 811 (The Holt Bill): Time to put us out of its misery

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (6 fans)   -- Page 3 of 4 page(s)

opednews.com

And here: http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_nancy_to_070414_the_eac_gopher_bash.htm

10) Vote counting secrecy: The most egregious bait and switch for many activists supporting the bill is that the original language calling for full disclosure in the bill has now been replaced with full nondisclosure, as well as adding requirements for public officials to sign nondisclosure agreements with private corporations in order to keep secret from the American people the manner in which our votes are being counted.

11) HR 811 imposes overly burdensome and cumbersome auditing and reporting requirements, many of which will not conform to current state practices and traditions. This is another area where the bill uses complexity and “experts” rather than simplicity and citizen oversight. It places the EAC between the state and the state’s certification of election results. It is ambiguous as to the reporting requirements and EAC authority in obstructing state certification of election results. It inappropriately involves an executive commission of four white house appointees in the process of certification of state election results.

5-Point Alternative Proposal for Meaningful Election Legislation with Checks and Balances
Plus Incentives for Real Paper Ballots and Hand Counts

1. In support of the principle of checks and balances and citizen oversight:
Require that Paper Ballots be Offered and Provided Voters at the Polls—
The appropriate election official at each polling place in an election for Federal office shall offer each individual who is eligible to cast a vote in the election at the polling place the opportunity to cast the vote using a pre-printed paper ballot which the individual may mark by hand and which is not produced by a direct recording electronic voting machine. If the individual accepts the offer to cast the vote using such a ballot, the official shall provide the individual with the ballot and the supplies necessary to mark the ballot, and shall ensure (to the greatest extent practicable) that the waiting period for the individual to cast a vote is not greater than the waiting period for an individual who does not agree to cast the vote using such a paper ballot under this paragraph.

Jurisdictions will ensure that a sufficient supply of paper ballots be available, that notice of the option is provided, that the ballots are treated with equal dignity provided to other ballots, including canvassing/counting those ballots on election day, and that consequences are provided for violations. In the event of violations related to the provision, canvassing, and handling of paper ballots, any citizen eligible to vote in the jurisdiction will have standing to go to court to require compliance and authority for the court to grant immediate relief. Funding for training and documentation for election officials and election workers in the proper hand counting methods and election administration using paper ballots will be appropriated to support this provision. Prior to election certification, appropriate protocols must be implemented to ensure the integrity of election results as authenticated by transparent vote counting methods.

(Compliance to be determined by each state in a state plan process that supports the standards for democratic elections, those being citizen oversight and security, and which process includes diverse stakeholders group including citizen representation, published plans, and consequences for noncompliance. State Plans will be published in the Federal Register.)

Effective Date State Plan: February, 2008

Effective Date Implementation: General Election November 2008



2. In support of the principle of fiscal responsibility and stabilization of state governmental administration, checks and balances and citizen oversight:

BUYOUT funding for states wishing to replace DRE systems with paper-based voting systems.
(BUYOUT funding can be applied to paper ballot, optical scan voting systems, paper ballot, hand count systems, or a combination thereof. In the case of buyout funding as applied to hand count systems, training costs may be included.)

(Compliance to be determined by each state in a state plan process that supports the standards for democratic elections, those being citizen oversight and security, and which process includes diverse stakeholders group including citizen representation, published plans, and consequences for noncompliance. State Plans will be published in the Federal Register.)
Effective Date: February, 2008



3. In support of the principle of checks and balances:
Dissolution of EAC and reallocation of its functional responsibilities to appropriate representational groups (as described below)

Effective Date: January 2008



4. In support of the principle of fiscal responsibility and stabilization of state governmental administration:
Prohibition on any additional unfunded mandates being added into the bill

Effective Date: Upon passage

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

Nancy Tobi is best known as a national leader in the voting rights movement for her seminal work exposing the dangers and fallacies in various election reform efforts past, present and future. Links to her works can be found at (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Snatching Defeat from the Jaws of Victory? by Joyce McCloy on Tuesday, Jun 5, 2007 at 9:53:59 PM
Anti paper??? by Nancy Tobi on Wednesday, Jun 6, 2007 at 8:48:20 AM
A Florida Activist speaks out in favor of HR 811 by Joyce McCloy on Wednesday, Jun 6, 2007 at 11:09:36 AM
Let's try this again: Holt doesn't work by Nancy Tobi on Wednesday, Jun 6, 2007 at 12:26:47 PM
Advice from a fellow Tar Heel by Chuck Garner on Wednesday, Jun 6, 2007 at 11:58:07 PM
Incremental change by John Burik on Thursday, Jun 7, 2007 at 11:13:40 PM