Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (4 comments)

Is The Constitution Really That Unfair?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (7 fans)   -- Page 3 of 6 page(s)

opednews.com

"To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;"

Again, the framers seemed to consider Congress the best money manager.

"To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;"

I italicize the word "regulate" here.  I italicize it elsewhere as well because the "strict Constitutionalists" seem to scoff at the fact that Congress has the power and, frankly, the responsibility to regulate anything.  The founders didn't appear to fear using the words "regulate" and "Congress" in the same sentence, albeit a very, very long sentence.

"To establish an (sic) uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and post Roads;"

Could it be that the framers meant that Congress should "establish" the Post Offices and then hand them over to private corporations?  As FedEx and UPS aren't mentioned, I'm certain that a "strict Constitutionalist" would have to answer, "No."

"To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme (sic) Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;"

Makes one wonder if Truman, Johnson (Lyndon, of course), Nixon and/or The Regime were/are aware of this one.  Oh, that's right, Congress told those people that it didn't want to be bothered, so it handed them blank checks to start any wars that they wanted to start with anyone they wanted to start them at any time and in any place.

"To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;"

I can see where this can be interpreted to mean that never ending war was OK, as long as Congress voted to finance it every two years.  I certainly hope that the "Strict Constitutionalists" are keeping an eye on the frequency with which one of this country's "Wars Against a Noun" is funded.  Another two years pass and ch-ching!

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

 

Michael Bonanno is an associate editor for OpEdNews.

He is also a published poet, essayist and musician who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Bonanno is a political progressive, not a Democratic Party apologist. He believes it's (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

When one finally connects to what the Constitution is. by DRSANGLE on Monday, Jan 14, 2008 at 6:06:32 PM
Those in need. by Gallaher on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:50:04 AM
AT LEAST, YOU'RE TRYING by tabonsell on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 4:53:05 PM
Thank you by Michael Bonanno on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 5:32:43 PM