Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

S. 1959 and the Great Social Divide

By       Message Kathryn Smith     Permalink
      (Page 3 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

- Advertisement -

And to warn them not to fall into the trap

B) Last but not least, this S 1959-created division among the grassroots could be a very good topic to write about, right here on Opednews. I will be very interested to read your thoughts about how to effectively undercut the perhaps intentionally-created Great Divide.

Nobody can do anything TO us. We are the ones who ourselves engage in any given dynamic. Therefore, using the power of awareness, we can studiously observe the dynamics for what they are and consciously decide not to go down that path.

I must add though that I think The Pen makes some important points, and some of which we can learn from.

A) For example, our arguments must be based on sound fact, for credibility’s sake, as clearly asked for by The Pen‘s letter.

B) By saying that the bill provides for civil liberties protections, they are forgetting that the bill states that the government “should not” (a recommendation) crack down on civil liberties and “should not” target any one group (Even while the bill specifically plans to set up Government study centers on college campuses, an act of targeted discrimination itself. What is the purpose of that target, in that particular social cross-sector? That‘s a question to ask ourselves).

They also forget that the bill specifically protects the Government‘s best interest with the inarguable words “Shall not“ as imperative. IE the Commission to study violent radicalization “should not” (recommendation) crack down on civil liberties but the citizens “shall not” (imperative) “coerce” the government. A confession of intent, right there.

C) Finally, “homegrown terrorism and violent radicalization” are so rare to begin with that there is no need for special legislation to “Protect” ---whom?? Not us! The GOVERNMENT---from them.

- Advertisement -

Last but not least, and let me point this out unequivocally:

There are “legal” (if not unconstitutional) loopholes opened up between the Patriot Act and S. 1959, acting together as a hand-and-glove pair. The overly-loose definition of “Terrorism” in the Patriot Act is such that it sweeps up religious and peace groups in its definition, according to so many organizations of every partisanship that to quote them all would be exhausting. www.aclu.org

Further, the Patriot Act grants the FBI the unilateral power to arrest us without warrant, probable cause, or connection to criminal activity at all. Former FBI agent Ted Gunderson calls it “a giant step toward a police state” www.patriotsaints.com/News/911/Conspiracy/IntelligenceKnew/ (be sure to click on back-up file: The original has been removed from the Web). And look at what the ultra-conservative Gun Owners of America have to say about this: http://www.gunowners.org/patriotii.htm

Even bird watchers are grilled as “terrorists” by the agenda-crazed FBI:

http://www.rightsmatter.org/multimedia/

- Advertisement -

http://www.aclu.org/safefree/spying/17548prs20050518.html

"Since when did feeding the homeless become a terrorist activity?" asked ACLU Associate Legal Director Ann Beeson. "When the FBI and local law enforcement target groups like Food Not Bombs under the guise of fighting terrorism, many Americans who oppose government policies will be discouraged from speaking out and exercising their rights." See also: www.aclu.org/safefree/general/20073prs20050718.html

And here is a 25-page free speech report done recently by the ACLU, as if such a thing even needs to be done: http://www.aclu.org/freespeech/gen/31878prs20070920.html

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

This quote summarizes the nature of my concerns and the content of personal experiences which stir my activism: "Necessity is the plea for every infringement on human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves". --Paul (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact EditorContact Editor
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Surviving an Economic Crash: Resources and Tips

Why Reducing, Reusing and Recycling Really *Does* Help the Environment

How Misguided Spirituality is Informing the Religious Right + Fascist Politics

Leaked "reports" about secret Congressional meeting may be a hoax

Army sources say troops to be deployed to USA for election "terrorist" curbing

FBI/police ordered to curtail protests: Explains Amy Goodman's arrest?