Tag(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats

Homeland Security Down the Toilet

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 3 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

And they call that a program.

We are saddled with a Congress made up of romantics. Not intellectually capable of making themselves conversant with the Constitution of the United States, they shoot from the hip with ill-advised reorganization. It’s romantic, this Department of Homeland Security. Hollow, but sounds solid. The USA Patriot Act. What could be more inspiring than a subversive piece of user-unfriendly law that configures each and every word to inspire lip-trembling allegiance?

An Act. We’re acting, by god. Whether or not we’re acting in your individual (or collective) best interests is another matter, you’ll just have to trust us. We’re not only acting, we’re acting as Patriots. Not a single Representative or Senator read the entire USA Patriot Act before it was muscled through the machinery of government by David Addington. Not one!

Nor did they read it after it was passed. Nor did they read the revised, new and improved version that Alberto Gonzales shoved in front of their campaign-weary eyes before these nit-wits reauthorized it. By that profound malfeasance in office, the Congress itself spawned the current fired-attorney flap that embarrasses everyone but George Bush and (presumably) Congress.

Michael Chertoff is an incompetent manager, a party hack and a danger to the United States, as is his ridiculously named organization. Rather than trying to fix what was (and is) a tragically conceived and mistaken response to a very real terrorist threat, the Congress needs to take back its failed effort. Chertoff's 215,000 employees throwing money is a prescription for fraud and thievery as well as terrorist attack.

Congress needs to immediately flush the DHS toilet and redirect money and support to existing agencies whose long-term employees know where and how to tighten security. There’s not a mayor, port authority, fire or police chief in the nation who wouldn’t benefit from that approach.

Who would you trust with your family’s safety, the PIC or your local authority?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

www.opinion-columns.com, http://politicalcrank.blogspot.com/

Jim Freeman's op-ed pieces and commentaries have appeared in The New York Times, Chicago Tribune, International Herald-Tribune, CNN, The New York Review, The Jon Stewart Daily Show and a number of magazines.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments