|
|
(more...)
, (less...)
Add to My Group(s)
Add to My Group(s)
By Jay Esbe (about the author)
Page 3 of 4 page(s)
The key word in all of this is "PROMULGATED". Fake, FALSIFIED, a RUSE, a PRETENSE.
So I believe I have WELL ESTABLISHED that what G.W. Bush has been doing post September 11th, fits with the following theory:
1. To utilize the attacks of 9/11 to begin a systematic campaign to destroy the sovereignty of not only Iraq, but "to be used in all the countries of the world".
2. To utilize well known -by Caesar and Hitler- techniques to instill fear, insecurity, and terror, in the American people to a high enough level, that they fulfill the desired allegiance as STATED by Bush 41: "To the United Nations".
3. This could by necessity, ONLY be "accomplished" by a President who WAS a "Fall guy" DUE to the required mechanism: Such a mechanism would REQUIRE that a President make a COMPLETE mess of EVERYTHING, to drive the American people to renounce the United States, and to accept a single "world government" .
Now, lest anyone accuse me of being a Democrat - not a chance-, the long range secret foreign policy objectives in question, could NEVER be "Long range" were the Democratic party not up to it's neck in this thing, for the foreign policy of the United States would by necessity change with a change in administrations.
The "New World Order" like any well laid trap, offers two choices, both of which lead to captivity. Let us look at stated ambitions under another administration further back:
"the 'house of world order' will have to be
built from the bottom up rather than from the top down...but an end
run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will
accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault."
Former U. S. Deputy Assistant Secretary
of State, Trilateralist and CFR member Richard Gardner -April, 1974
If my analysis of G.W. Bush as a "fall guy" is correct, it means that he's been set up for the purposes of creating the very conditions which will lead to his political destruction, and he will fulfill the ambition of the New World Orderists like any "good soldier" : Sacrifice himself for the cause.
The events which I believe are coming are as follows:
Some kind of melt-down of America, whether by losing the war in Iraq, by mass civil insurrection, by yet ANOTHER "PROMULAGATED" "terror" attack, a full scale depression, will happen. Whether just ONE of these events, or ALL of them, they WILL certainly cause the political destruction of G.W. Bush, and those who're implementing the final imposition of the will of the membership of "The Order", know this.
Therefor:
LOOK to see a President which follows Bush who will APPEAR to be the "man of peace" and international cooperation. He'll be a Democrat in all likelihood. By the time Bush has taken this country where he intends to take it, the "Prophecy" of Henry Kissinger will be fulfilled with stunning accuracy; The American people will fairly BEG for the United Nations to govern America.
If one reads this and concludes that we have no choice that's not an awful choice, that is, unfortunately correct. ONLY an independent candidate expressly known NOT to be affiliated with one of the many orders under the umbrella of the top of the pyramid of the "new World Orderists" could POSSIBLY reverse the current course.
Given the level of trance imposed upon the majority of the American people by a media fully complicate in the orderist's objectives, I put the odds of stopping them at close to zero. The majority of Americans have bought the disinformation hook, line, and sinker, and MAJOR portion of the disinformation campaign, involves utterly discrediting the very concept of a "conspiracy" as "lunatic fringe" thought. It's not, but "guilt by association" through the promotion of ridicules theories about "Reptilian genetics" and "Aliens" have so BLINDED the majority to the FACT of a conspiracy, the orderists best friend is in fact, the complicit, OR "unwitting" "conspiracy theorist" who falls into his own delusions.
But what I have set forth, for those who have the capacity for INDEPENDANT THOUGHT, and critical analysis, stands on known philosophies and reason alone, and I have no personal stake in it's "truth". The bad news effects me as well, and I don't want to believe it either, I just have to at this point. Am I mostly right about this? I hope not, I hope to God.<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Page 3 of 4 page(s)
So I believe I have WELL ESTABLISHED that what G.W. Bush has been doing post September 11th, fits with the following theory:
1. To utilize the attacks of 9/11 to begin a systematic campaign to destroy the sovereignty of not only Iraq, but "to be used in all the countries of the world".
2. To utilize well known -by Caesar and Hitler- techniques to instill fear, insecurity, and terror, in the American people to a high enough level, that they fulfill the desired allegiance as STATED by Bush 41: "To the United Nations".
3. This could by necessity, ONLY be "accomplished" by a President who WAS a "Fall guy" DUE to the required mechanism: Such a mechanism would REQUIRE that a President make a COMPLETE mess of EVERYTHING, to drive the American people to renounce the United States, and to accept a single "world government" .
Now, lest anyone accuse me of being a Democrat - not a chance-, the long range secret foreign policy objectives in question, could NEVER be "Long range" were the Democratic party not up to it's neck in this thing, for the foreign policy of the United States would by necessity change with a change in administrations.
The "New World Order" like any well laid trap, offers two choices, both of which lead to captivity. Let us look at stated ambitions under another administration further back:
"the 'house of world order' will have to be
built from the bottom up rather than from the top down...but an end
run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will
accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault."
Former U. S. Deputy Assistant Secretary
of State, Trilateralist and CFR member Richard Gardner -April, 1974
If my analysis of G.W. Bush as a "fall guy" is correct, it means that he's been set up for the purposes of creating the very conditions which will lead to his political destruction, and he will fulfill the ambition of the New World Orderists like any "good soldier" : Sacrifice himself for the cause.
The events which I believe are coming are as follows:
Some kind of melt-down of America, whether by losing the war in Iraq, by mass civil insurrection, by yet ANOTHER "PROMULAGATED" "terror" attack, a full scale depression, will happen. Whether just ONE of these events, or ALL of them, they WILL certainly cause the political destruction of G.W. Bush, and those who're implementing the final imposition of the will of the membership of "The Order", know this.
Therefor:
LOOK to see a President which follows Bush who will APPEAR to be the "man of peace" and international cooperation. He'll be a Democrat in all likelihood. By the time Bush has taken this country where he intends to take it, the "Prophecy" of Henry Kissinger will be fulfilled with stunning accuracy; The American people will fairly BEG for the United Nations to govern America.
If one reads this and concludes that we have no choice that's not an awful choice, that is, unfortunately correct. ONLY an independent candidate expressly known NOT to be affiliated with one of the many orders under the umbrella of the top of the pyramid of the "new World Orderists" could POSSIBLY reverse the current course.
Given the level of trance imposed upon the majority of the American people by a media fully complicate in the orderist's objectives, I put the odds of stopping them at close to zero. The majority of Americans have bought the disinformation hook, line, and sinker, and MAJOR portion of the disinformation campaign, involves utterly discrediting the very concept of a "conspiracy" as "lunatic fringe" thought. It's not, but "guilt by association" through the promotion of ridicules theories about "Reptilian genetics" and "Aliens" have so BLINDED the majority to the FACT of a conspiracy, the orderists best friend is in fact, the complicit, OR "unwitting" "conspiracy theorist" who falls into his own delusions.
But what I have set forth, for those who have the capacity for INDEPENDANT THOUGHT, and critical analysis, stands on known philosophies and reason alone, and I have no personal stake in it's "truth". The bad news effects me as well, and I don't want to believe it either, I just have to at this point. Am I mostly right about this? I hope not, I hope to God.<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Jay Esbe is a writer with a background in cultural anthropology and comparative religion and lives in Seattle Washington.
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
 Contact Editor |
Comments
The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.
This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.
| 5 comments |
To view all comments:
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
THE PRICE OF PROPHECY
by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 10:58:30 AM
now, both eyes..
by k kelly on Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 12:04:27 PM
Yes, the truth has set you free.
by jpsmith123 on Monday, May 28, 2007 at 11:14:57 AM
A Man Without A Country; The Price Of Truth.
by Fritson on Tuesday, May 29, 2007 at 5:48:16 AM
I don't have a Masters degree,
by Beverly McMinn on Friday, Jun 1, 2007 at 1:31:09 PM