Tag(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (22 comments)

9/11 Email

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (3 fans)   -- Page 3 of 7 page(s)

opednews.com

9/11 COMMISSIONERS

The 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials lied to the Commission, and considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements, yet didn't bother to tell the American people (free subscription required).

Indeed, the co-chairs of the Commission (Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton) now admit that the Commission largely operated based upon political considerations.

9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says "I don't believe for a minute we got everything right", that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, that the 9/11 debate should continue, and that the 9/11 Commission report was only "the first draft" of history.

9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that "There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn't have access . . . ."

9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said "We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting"

Former 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: "It is a national scandal"; "This investigation is now compromised"; and "One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up".

The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) who led the 9/11 staff's inquiry, said "I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described .... The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years.... This is not spin. This is not true."

SCIENTISTS

A prominent physicist with 33 years of service for the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC (Dr. David L. Griscom) said that the official theory for why the Twin Towers and world trade center building 7 collapsed "does not match the available facts" and supports the theory that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition

A world-renowned scientist, recipient of the National Medal of Science, America's highest honor for scientific achievement (Dr. Lynn Margulis) said:

"I suggest that those of us aware and concerned demand that the glaringly erroneous official account of 9/11 be dismissed as a fraud and a new, thorough, and impartial investigation be undertaken."
The former head of the Fire Science Division of the government agency which claims that the World Trade Centers collapsed due to fire (the National Institute of Standards and Technology), who is a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering, with more than 25 years experience in fire research and its applications, and is a professor in the Department of Fire Protection Engineering at the University of Maryland (Dr. James Quintiere), called for an independent review of the World Trade Center Twin Tower collapse investigation. "I wish that there would be a peer review of this," he said, referring to the NIST investigation. "I think all the records that NIST has assembled should be archived. I would really like to see someone else take a look at what they've done; both structurally and from a fire point of view. ... I think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable."

Former Director for Research, Director for Aeronautical Projects, and Flight Research Program Manager for NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center, who holds masters degrees in both physics and engineering (Dwain A. Deets) says:

"The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Centers on 9/11].''

A prominent physicist, former U.S. professor of physics from a top university, and a former principal investigator for the U.S. Department of Energy, Division of Advanced Energy Projects (Dr. Steven E. Jones) stated that the world trade centers were brought down by controlled demolition

A U.S. physics professor who teaches at several universities (Dr. Crockett Grabbe) believes that the World Trade Centers were brought down by controlled demolition

An expert on demolition (Bent Lund) said that the trade centers were brought down with explosives (in Danish)

A Dutch demolition expert (Danny Jowenko) stated that WTC 7 was imploded

A safety engineer and accident analyst for the Finnish National Safety Technology Authority (Dr. Heikki Kurttila) stated regarding WTC 7 that "The great speed of the collapse and the low value of the resistance factor strongly suggest controlled demolition."

A 13-year professor of metallurgical engineering at a U.S. university, with a PhD in materials engineering, a former Congressional Office of Technology Assessment Senior Staff Member (Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn), is calling for a new investigation of 9/11

A Danish professor of chemistry (Dr. Niels Harrit) said, in a mainstream Danish newspaper, "WTC7 collapsed exactly like a house of cards. If the fires or damage in one corner had played a decisive role, the building would have fallen in that direction. You don't have to be a woodcutter to grasp this" (translated)

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7

 

George Washington


As a political activist for decades, I have rejoiced in victories for the people and mourned in defeats. I chose the pen name "George Washington" because - as (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
22 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Why Is It So Difficult To Convince People? by CB Brooklyn on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2007 at 12:09:57 PM
one peice of evidence I have not seen by ibrahim turner on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2007 at 2:48:00 PM
Come to the Boston Tea Party and 9/11 conference by Joel S. Hirschhorn on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2007 at 4:06:59 PM
AE911Truth Promotes the Molten Metal Hoax by CB Brooklyn on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2007 at 5:03:07 PM
dissent by gravity32 on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2007 at 8:06:24 PM
Notice gravity32's Slick Way of Deception by CB Brooklyn on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2007 at 10:33:20 PM
And thus, we see... the Truth - according to South Park by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2007 at 11:09:11 PM
Perfect Example of How the Media Discredits the Propaganda! by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 1:00:20 AM
Because of the scientific method by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 11:41:52 AM
That's What I Am Doing. by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 12:49:53 PM
I'm not following you... by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 1:32:48 PM
An Hypothesis is Only Valid... by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 1:58:34 PM
These comments by Geraldo on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 4:44:56 AM
You Can Look at it That Way by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 12:53:56 PM
Logical fallacy - still by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 2:41:47 PM
Correction to your Analysis by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 2:56:20 PM
Another and better theory that fits the available data exist by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 3:31:44 PM
Another thing... by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 3:48:37 PM
Instead of quoting Occam over and over by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 5:06:42 PM
A MASSIVE Sunkist Orange by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 5:47:27 PM
You have got to be kidding by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 4:59:09 PM
A rose by any other name would still smell as sweet by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 6:04:43 PM