Tags for This Article:

Right Wing (46) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s):
Add to My Group
June 20, 2007 at 12:59:28

Market Failure: The Back of the Invisible Hand

by Ernest Partridge     Page 3 of 3 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Copyright 2007, by Ernest Partridge

 1  |  2  |  3

 

http://www.crisispapers.org

Dr. Ernest Partridge is a consultant, writer and lecturer in the field of Environmental Ethics and Public Policy. Partridge has taught philosophy at the University of California, and in Utah, Colorado and Wisconsin. He publishes the website, "The Online Gadfly" (www.igc.org/gadfly) and co-edits the progressive website, "The Crisis Papers" (www.crisispapers.org). His book in progress, "Conscience of a Progressive," can be seen at www.igc.org/gadfly/progressive/^toc.htm .

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments

Been around the block a few times.
Blue PilgrimBeen around the block a few times.

Consider the state of the world

WW1, WW2, Korean war, Vietnam war, Iraq -- innumerable wars and conflicts, poverty, plague, misery ---

This is the invisible fist: the political counterpart to the invisible hand. It is the result of just letting things happen as they will without any effort to make things better -- the 'natural' forces of greed and lust for power. If there were some 'invisible' force controling things then we should be living in a relative paradise, and should always have done so -- no intelligence, planning, contstraint, or knowledge needed.

But who is it who argues for no rules? Look now: we see Bush arguing that the Geneva Conventions, international law, the Constitution, any laws -- are obsolete and of no value. And look at the results.

The invisible hand has a name; it's name is 'chaos'.

by Blue Pilgrim (0 articles, 3 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 997 comments) on Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 3:06:42 PM
 



djl

individuals vs. corporations

Note that the original quote by Smith refers to an individual. Indeed a case can always be made that when individuals trade between themselves, the trade tends to be somewhat equitable.  The old barter system does work fairly well in small groups.  The problem arises when "corporations" are substitute for "individuals" in Smith's model.  Who am I trading with when I trade with a corporation? How can such a trade be equitable, especially when one of the parties (the corporation) can more easily modify the laws to their advantage?   Smith's model of free markets is not applicable to a market consisting of both individuals and corporations.  If libertarians really wanted a free market system, then they should call for the immediate abolishment of corporations (since a corporation is essentially a voluntary self-governmental organization, with specific internally-defined rules (i.e., laws) used to control how their product is created and marketed, and is thus, by definition, not a free market system).   Results from studies of game theory (an area of mathematics which studies the interaction of "intelligent" systems) show that without specific and consistently applied  penalties, interactions between players (i.e., buying and selling) will always lead to massive wealth inequities between players.  Smith's model of the free market cannot be applied when the rules for trade are not consistent for all possible trades (the rules for trading between corporations and for trading within a corporation differ). Any conclusion based on this incorrect assumption is not logically valid.

by djl (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 6 comments) on Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 5:51:03 PM
 


not right now thanks
lwarmannot right now thanks

individuals vs. individuals

Trade between individuals of equal power has a chance of being fair, but there are numerous examples of individuals exploiting other individuals, ranging from the classic unscrupulous used-car dealer to the equally classic well-heeled businessman offering a starving runaway $5 for a blowjob.

It's true that a corporation has way more power than any individual, but it doesn't let  the exploitative individual off the hook either. 

by lwarman (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 61 comments) on Thursday, June 21, 2007 at 9:32:58 PM
 

 

4 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Children dying in Haiti, victims of food crisis exacerbated by four devastating tropical storms Posted by Stephen Fox

The cholesterol - heart disease scam: How the medical-industrial complex is raking in billions at our expense by Richard Clark

Keith Olbermann Broke Up With Me! by Shannyn Moore

Surviving an Economic Crash: Resources and Tips by Kathryn Smith

Congress Opposes Bush Pardons by David Swanson

Fate of Lakotahs Highlights America's Failed Native American Policies by Stephen Lendman

A Turkey By Any Other Name--Is Still the Governor of Alaska by Brasch

Home Depot Founder: Retailers Who Don't Support GOP "Should Be Shot" Posted by Joan Brunwasser

Study Confirms Genetically Modified Crops Threaten Human Fertility and Health Safety Posted by sadelaine

Obama may choose Monsanto's GE-nightmare over an organic human vision by Linn Cohen-Cole

Go To Top 50 Most Popular