Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...)
Group(s): , Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats

Senator Feinstein's Election Reform Bill: A Constitutional Heresy

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 3 of 7 page(s)

opednews.com

Not only does the bill give the EAC authority to determine how elections are to be administered at the State and local levels, but by making the EAC guidelines and certification process mandatory, this bill would also give the EAC power to override State and local preferences. The guidelines and certification process — established by these four Presidential appointees unaccountable to the public — would carry the same power as federal law.

Here are some of the expanded powers of the EAC under S. 1487:

A. Authority to set the accuracy standard for voting equipment. HAVA set the standard in stone — 1 error in 500,000 votes. But S. 1487 changes that to whatever standard is adopted by the Commission.

B. As of 2010, sole authority to determine the pool of voting systems available to states for use in holding elections for federal office (see #1A above).

A. Authority to determine the “distinct communities” whose votes may be legally lost at a higher than normal rate (see #2 below).

B. Authority to grant “emergency certification” to voting systems whether they meet federal standards or not.

C. Authority to determine which software must be or must not be disclosed to State election officials.

D. Authority to determine the individuals to whom software will be disclosed for research purposes.

E. Authority to determine whether or not a State is in compliance with the security (chain of custody) requirements.

F. Authority to determine whether an “independent” testing lab is “sufficiently independent” from other interests.

G. Authority to determine which, if any, “experts” may observe the certification testing.

H. Authority to determine the “model audit” for States to “consider” when establishing their own audit process.

I. Authority to delay certification of an election until a State submits all the paperwork the Commission requests, at its discretion, regarding the audit.

J. Authority to determine the method by which voters will be notified that they are about to be removed from the voter rolls.

K. Authority to establish standards to govern the accreditation of the people authorized to observe election and which activities must be open to their observation.

L. Authority to establish rules governing administration of early voting (newly required in this bill), including geographic locations of poll sites.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7

 

Ellen Theisen is the founder and Co-Director of VotersUnite.Org.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2012, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum