Tags for This Article:

Voting Integrity (2708)  Democracy (1945)  Voting Technology (1918)  Voting (1675)  Voting Machines (1479)  Voting Reform (1059)  Voting Laws State (605)  Fraud (568)  Technology (396)  Computers (203) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
October 11, 2007 at 00:05:34

WHO'LL STOP THE TRAIN (WRECK)? Reject Theft-Enabling Voting Computers

by andi novick     Page 3 of 7 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Not only does New York lack the plausible deniability the rest of the nation may assert as the litigation for fraud and breach of contract against the voting vendors mushrooms, but New York is also on notice that these vendors are ineligible to do business in New York. The evidence of the vendors' flagrantly "irresponsible" conduct and record of failed voting equipment is contained at http://www.votersunite.org/info/VendorsProhibited.pdf , http://www.votersunite.org/info/IrresponsibleVendors.pdf and http://www.votersunite.org/info/UpdatedVendorIrresponsibility807.pdf. Non-responsible vendors include a vendor whose committed a crime, been indicted for a crime, committed ethical violations, exhibited failed past performance on other contracts, etc. The list of "non-responsibility" for the voting vendors New York is proposing to do business with is a virtual who's who of non-responsibility.  Who in New York is paying attention? Who is going to take responsibility, look at the evidence and enforce the law, enjoining these vendors from conducting business in New York?

Who is going to implement New York's law, which requires that the state's machines be capable of demonstrating their "integrity and security" by being able to "demonstrate an accurate tally"3. None of the machines New York is considering purchasing can do that. Secretary Bowen has already told us of all of these machines' "inadequa[cy] to ensure accuracy and integrity of the election results". New York could choose to disregard her findings- in which case I bet I know where we could pick up some equipment at fire sale prices. Or is someone in a position of responsibility in New York going to step up and ensure New Yorkers that they will not be trading in their lever machines for these electronic voting systems now publicly revealed to be not merely snake oil, but the antithesis of what is required for a secure, transparent, reliable electoral system?

Why Computerized Voting Systems are so Much worse than Our Lever Machines4

Computerized Voting Machines Are Vulnerable to Viruses and Other Attacks Which Can Spread Between Voting Machines and Steal Votes on the Infected Machines Regardless of New York's Ban on Wireless Devices

All of the electronic voting machines tested in California were found vulnerable to malicious attacks that could "affect election outcomes". The reports also point out:

An attack could plausibly be accomplished by a single skilled individual with temporary access to a single voting machine. The damage could be extensive - malicious code could spread to every voting machine in polling places and to county election servers.

The fact that New York prohibits wireless devices will not prevent the election-altering attacks found by California's independent experts to be so easily executable. I asked Bruce O'Dell
5 to explain why even with a ban on wireless, there's really no such thing as a "closed system" with "stand-alone" computers. Understanding that computerized voting machines are fundamentally different than mechanical lever machines in this way is essential to appreciating how devastating it would be for New York to switch our lever machines for these electronic voting machines, particularly the DREs. The implications for tampering on a grand scale are breathtaking.

Malware (software that performs a malicious function) can be spread from voting machine to voting machine - like deliberately-crafted viruses that not only change election results, but spread form machine to machine via memory cards, and delete themselves at the end of the election (see the Princeton report for an example).

But that's just one way to subvert the voting software. Here are more ways I can think of:- hardware exploits; the manufacturer of a circuit board substitutes components which contain hardware with covert functionality; this was exploited by the CIA against the Soviet Union in the 1980s, when they discovered a company smuggling computer hardware into Russia form the West; among the consequences was the largest non-nuclear explosion ever recorded, as the compromised equipment was installed to regulate the Soviet natural gas system. This is described in the attached document, (which is among the best short introductions to computer security that is accessible to the general reader). And of course, there is simply no way to know for sure if a wireless receiver has been built into any piece of voting equipment. The feasibility and consequences of that particular class of exploit are described in Section 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 of www.verifiedvoting.org/downloads/shamos-rebuttal.pdf

- Rootkit and virtualization technology. Both the Brennan Center and Princeton reports mention rootkit or virtualization attacks on voting equipment. A rootkit is a type of software exploit which specifically replaces and/or bypasses portions of the operating system that are used to detect the presence of malicious software. (Google "rootkit" - Wikipedia has a reasonably accurate overview). With sufficiently sophisticated virtualization technology, the voting software and operating system itself could be perfectly fine; it would just be interrupted during elections to enable the malicious code to execute. There would be no way for the non-rootkit code to know this had happened. This kind of exploit is ideally suited to be introduced by malicious insiders at the vendor or manufacturer, but anyone with hands-on access to central tabulators or memory cards or precinct equipment, or direct or indirect access to the networks connected to central tabulators, could introduce a self-replicating rootkit.

- Device driver and privileged code. Every other software component might be legitimate, but compromising device drivers or privileged operating system code enables malicious code to take complete control of the device. One or a few malicious insiders at the manufacturer, vendor - or anyone with hands-on access to central tabulators or precinct equipment, or direct or indirect access to the networks connected to central tabulators, could compromise thousands of machines. This code can be distributed under the guise of a software patch if you believe Chris Hood (the whistleblower who reported undocumented patch distribution in Diebold equipment in Georgia in 2002). [For more about this whistleblower and the theft of Georgia's elections, see RFK Jr.'s http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/11717105/robert_f_kennedy_jr__will_the_next_election_be_hacked].

- Malicious application logic. Ideally suited for exploit by malicious insiders at the vendor, with potential exploitation by malicious insiders at the state or county election office (anyone with hands-on access to central tabulators, memory cards or precinct equipment, or direct or indirect access to the networks connected to central tabulators), as Harri Hursti demonstrated with his Diebold op-scan exploits.

- Memory card exploits. Both Hursti and Princeton researchers have shown how executable code can be transmitted on memory cards from machine to machine.

The following studies/reports all confirm that there is no such thing as closed, stand-alone computerized voting systems and attest to the ease with which voting software can be corrupted to alter the outcome of an election, often without detection. Moreover, these independent studies demonstrate how computerized voting has created the potential for theft on a massive scale, made possible for the first time in history by this technology.

http://brennancenter.org/dynamic/subpages/download_file_39288.pdf http://itpolicy.princeton.edu/voting/ts-paper.pdf http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_vsr.htm http://www.blackboxvoting.org/BBVtsxstudy.pdf http://www.blackboxvoting.org/BBVreport.pdf

If You Don't Call Your Government on its Negligence and Irresponsibility, Who Do You Think Is Going to Do That?

These computers, which the nation has been forced to vote on, have created the very opposite of what 150 years of case law in New York has established as essential to a democratic election: a secure, accurate means to vote in which the risk of tampering is reduced as much as is humanly possible. Nothing in New York's "better" law, including the ban of wireless devices or the requirement that source coding be places in escrow, will adequately safeguard against the potential for this wholesale computer-assisted fraud, which humans could never have achieved alone.6

All of the inspection reports mentioned above are responding to the existing crisis wherein the other states already bought these unsafe and unreliable electronic voting systems, leaving the computer experts to propose mitigation strategies in an attempt to make the most of a bad situation. There is no excuse for New York to purchase these poorly designed, insecure machines only to have to then spend millions more of our tax dollars trying to compensate for their inadequacies through auditing and mitigation strategies. Instead, New York can pay attention to the overwhelming evidence and make the only reasonable decision – which is to not purchase such flawed and budget-breaking voting systems.

The other states, all of which have committed the error of negligently presuming the voting machines sold by these vendors were secure, are now suffering the consequences of their irresponsibility. No responsible business would approach security that way. As Bruce O'Dell stated to me: The boards of directors of publicly-owned companies that applied the same standard to their corporate accounting systems would face the very real prospect of personal jail time under the federal Sarbanes-Oxley legislation, and their corporation's stock could well be delisted.

 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7

 

www.re-media.org

Andi Novick Northeast Citizens for Responsible Media www.re-media.org

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments

Mark A. Adams earned his BA in business administration with a major in finance and a minor in economics at the University of South Florida. He earned his law degree and his master of business administration at the University of Florida where he also worked as a teaching assistant in the Economics Department.

Mark practiced law in Florida. In 2006, Mark represented Max Linn, the Reform Party candidate for Governor of Florida, in successful lawsuits brought against the media to re...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Mark AdamsMark A. Adams earned his BA in business administration with a major in finance and a minor in economics at the University of South Florida. He earned his law degree and his master of business administration at the University of Florida where he also worked as a teaching assistant in the Economics Department.

Mark practiced law in Florida. In 2006, Mark represented Max Linn, the Reform Party candidate for Governor of Florida, in successful lawsuits brought against the media to re...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Andi, you are truly a patriot!

In case this article did not convince you, check out Dr. Steve Freeman Speaks on Election Fraud to find out about election fraud and learn what you can do to help at this link:

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_mark_ada_071010_dr__steve_freeman_sp.htm

Please realize that if your vote does not count, then you have no power to influence your government! When you have no power to influence your government, you are no longer free, instead you are just a subject whose wishes, feelings, and life mean nothing to those in power. Take action now!

by Mark Adams (19 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 256 comments) on Thursday, October 11, 2007 at 9:42:42 AM
 


I learned at a very young age in the 60's that the press never really understood the War or The anger against the War.

The Press paid more attention to the Political Battles, not the people that were actually dying or watching their sons and daughters leave home for War. Yes, I'm one of those Sons that still feels betrayed not only then but even now.

I'm a seeker of truth and it's hard to filter out the truth from what the press reports.

Founding member ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

FalconerI learned at a very young age in the 60's that the press never really understood the War or The anger against the War.

The Press paid more attention to the Political Battles, not the people that were actually dying or watching their sons and daughters leave home for War. Yes, I'm one of those Sons that still feels betrayed not only then but even now.

I'm a seeker of truth and it's hard to filter out the truth from what the press reports.

Founding member ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

We must add each other to our calling Circular Firing Squad

Outstanding Article Andi,
         With Contracts like these privatization of Elections is a total sell out of the Voice of the people to corporate Lobbyist.
No where is this problem more evident than with the Arrogant Voting System Vendors. Sequoia, ES&S, Diebold whatever?
Our quest for Justice has shown us the Dark side of how the Laws of this Nation have been corrupted by the Money Party.
Corporate Corruption shall reign unbounded,
When money is the single greatest denominator determining who Wins or Loses in our political system.
We must dramatically change the methods of funding Elections or our Politicians will always be owned by the Money Party.
Citizen Bill
PS. Answer: Public Funded Campaigns.

Contact:  William F. Faulkner, MBA

Verified Voting of Florida - VerifiedVoting.ORG - Florida's State Rep.

FalconCam@MSN.com - (850) 458-2497

by Falconer (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 10 comments) on Thursday, October 11, 2007 at 11:38:45 AM
 


Erik Larson, Human Being and concerned Citizen. I only advocate and practice non-violent methods of social and political activism & change.
Better World OrderErik Larson, Human Being and concerned Citizen. I only advocate and practice non-violent methods of social and political activism & change.

thanks Andi

even if our "representatives" were honorable above-reproach people, it would only be just and right that the electoral process be open and accountable to the People, whom it's supposed to serve. The fact that most "representatives" are Republocrat subhuman scum beholden to corporations and monied elites, and that they're actively supporting an electoral system that is fraught with bugs and open to hijacking means that any election conducted on evoting machines is automatically delegitmized. Why are they so afraid of being accountable to the People. Do they really believe, as David Rockefeller said, that a government controlled by the elites is preferable to democracy?

by Better World Order (4 articles, 444 quicklinks, 31 diaries, 970 comments) on Thursday, October 11, 2007 at 9:51:04 PM
 

 

3 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

The Controversy Surrounding Obama's Birth by adeeba folami

Radio Treason? Right Wing Talkers Skirted Disclosure Law by Gustav Wynn

Hope You Die Before You Get Old by David Michael Green

Heroic Pitbull Rescues Family in Assault, which Abandons Him at "Shelter" Posted by Stephen Fox

"Oops, We Meant $7 TRILLION!" What Hank and Ben Are Up to and How They Plan to Pay for It All by Ellen Brown

George W. Bush Belongs In Prison by Joel S. Hirschhorn

10 INDISPENSABLE BROADCAST JOURNALIST'S WORDS/PHRASES by Vince Williams

Can A Neo-conservative Rule Left-of-Center Canada? by dick overfield

If Barack Obama really wants change... by Jeremy Frombach

Pentagon Recruits Kids Under 17, Violating UN Protocol by Sherwood Ross

Go To Top 50 Most Popular