Tags for This Article:

Government (3407)  Republican (2405)  Politics (1526)  History (1223)  Religion (1148)  History (945)  Presidency (793)  White House (719)  Women (687)  Religion And Values (223)  Religion As Govt Policy (189)  Romney Mitt (98)  Religion-Politics (63)  Religion-Politics (58)  Mitt Romney (39) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
October 27, 2007 at 12:47:10

"That same old problem of religion in politics: Mitt Romney, Mormonism, and The White House"

by Robin Hardy     Page 3 of 5 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

[iv] American Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776.

[v] Stewart Winger. Lincoln, Religion, and Romantic Cultural Politics.  (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2003) p. 85.

[vi] Martin E. Marty, “Religion and Politics,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 572, Presidential Campaigns: Sins of Omission. (Nov., 2000). P 156.

[vii] Ibid.

[viii] Ibid.

[ix] Joan Lowy,“Faith adopts key role in 2008 campaign” The Associated Press, June 1, 2007.

[x] Ibid.

[xi] Ibid.

[xii] Scott Schulte, “Resilient Romney: Can he play in Peoria?” Utah Spirit, June 2007. p. 7.

[xiii] Ibid.

[xiv] “Talking Points” in The Week, October 5, 2007.

[xv] Joan Lowy, “Faith adopts key role in 2008 campaign” The Associated Press, June 1, 2007.

[xvi] Kip [blogger], “Mitt Romney is no Jack Kennedy,” A Stitch in Haste, July 27, 2007.

[xvii] Scott Schulte, “Resilient Romney: Can he play in Peoria?” Utah Spirit, June, 2007. p. 7.

[xviii] AP Interview: Romney considering speech to discuss role of his Mormon faith in politics.  Associated Press.  Thursday, July 26, 2007.

[xix] Ibid. 

 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

Robin Hardy is a senior PhD candidate in History at The University of Utah. She is passionate about politics, human rights, the environment, and issues affecting the under-represented like children, the working poor, females in many parts of the world, and animals.

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments

independent
Robert Winnindependent

religion in politics

       There is no problem concerning religion that I can see.  We have freedom of religion in the United States,  which would include Presidential candidates.  People who do not want to vote for a candidate because of religious reasons  are  free to vote for someone else.

       The problem is with political parties and their system of primary elections.  If people are only allowed to vote for two major party candidates, all others being excluded from the ballot, then we have a condition where the media, education institutions, government, etc., are trying to select candidates who conform to "political correctness".

        The remedy for this is, of course, independent candidates for office, which is why in recent years the parties have been legislating nomination petition signature requirements that put candidacy out of reach for independent voters.  For example, in Arizona, the state where I live, an independent candidate has to get about 15,000 signatures, while a major party candidate has to get between three and four thousand to appear on the ballot.   This strangle-hold will have to eventually be broken by a write-in candidate.

Robert B. Winn

by Robert Winn (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 28 comments) on Sunday, October 28, 2007 at 9:52:49 AM
 


I am a black woman who is a progressive and which to find a way to get this country back on its feet by shaking up the status quo.
chip90043I am a black woman who is a progressive and which to find a way to get this country back on its feet by shaking up the status quo.

religion in politics

I for one am sick and tired of this kind of posturing that you fine in this kind of presidential debate. If everyone ask themselves what is the significant of voting for someone who uses his or her religion to connect to voters without realizing that maybe they are only doing it to get votes. We are already have a so call christian president in office, but yet no one can tell me what he has done that represented anything that had to do with christianity. Dont people realize that religion and politics dont mix. religion will always get burned because money and business has always trump over religion. There is the article VI that says no one has to have a religious belief or belong to any religon to hold politics office but it is still being used aas a litmus test. Which I wonder how many good candidates could we have if it wasnt such a big issue. How many of them are being lefted out because they do not adhere to any religion?  A candidates idea doesnt come from what religion he practices but his or her vision and common sense abilities is where they get their ideas.  So I would like to know how many times will this country has to get burned in order to understand that religion should also be used in its proper place and not to leave certain members of our society out.

by chip90043 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 60 comments) on Sunday, October 28, 2007 at 11:08:31 AM
 


School teacher, age 37.
QuinSchool teacher, age 37.

The WHOLE picture of a religion

This must be the twentieth article I've read asking the exact same question: Will America accept a Mormon candidate for president despite Mormonism's 'oddities?' There is absolutely nothing new here, and this column is indicative of a pervasive attiude in the media that they just won't let go: That Mormonism is strictly a liability.

When will journalists start doing their jobs, and start doing in-depth analysis from ALL perspectives? Mormonism is not just a liability. It strengthens Romney's candidacy when people actually examine the Mormon faith in its entirety.

Mormons are well-known for their integrity, work ethic, and responsibility. Many institutions and businesses, particularly those who have located to Utah, seek-out Mormon people because their work values and personal integrity are highly valued. Mormons who have served as missionaries (including Romney) have an understanding of and appreciation for cultural differences, and oftentimes second language skills. Mormons support self reliance, and have a singular welfare program that conservatives from Ronald Reagan to Dr. Laura have marvelled at. A WELFARE PROGRAM!!! At a time where everyone treats family values as a popular buzzword, Mormons are among the groups in the nation (and world) who actually live it. Finally, the vast majority of Mormons live the values of Christianity: Selfless service, kindness, compassion, love for one's neighbor and one's enemy, faith in God. There is so much more to the Mormon faith than a brief history of plural marriage. Though faith is the motivator, these qualities also make Mormons good neighbors, good citizens and good leaders.

Disclosure: Yes, I am a Mormon. I do not write the above to boast. Mormonism isn't what it is because of me. I am a Mormon because of what Mormonism is. I admire my family, friends and leaders in the Mormon faith too much to sit by and let them and their faith be dismissed by the press as mere oddities for whom Mitt Romney should apologize.

Religion matters ... there is no getting around it. Though there is no official test, each voter is allowed to choose based on whatever criteria he or she likes. Voters who wish to be fair and honest with themselves and others will examine how Romney's faith and values have prepared him to do the job and lead the nation. Some will use prejudices to vote, while others will use sincerity and reason.

The question is: When will those in the media drop their own prejudices, premature conclusions and agendas, and stop 'Photoshopping' (editing) Mormonism's clear and obvious strengths out of the picture?

by Quin (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments) on Sunday, October 28, 2007 at 11:36:06 AM
 

 

3 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

The Controversy Surrounding Obama's Birth by adeeba folami

Radio Treason? Right Wing Talkers Skirted Disclosure Law by Gustav Wynn

Hope You Die Before You Get Old by David Michael Green

Heroic Pitbull Rescues Family in Assault, which Abandons Him at "Shelter" Posted by Stephen Fox

"Oops, We Meant $7 TRILLION!" What Hank and Ben Are Up to and How They Plan to Pay for It All by Ellen Brown

George W. Bush Belongs In Prison by Joel S. Hirschhorn

10 INDISPENSABLE BROADCAST JOURNALIST'S WORDS/PHRASES by Vince Williams

Can A Neo-conservative Rule Left-of-Center Canada? by dick overfield

If Barack Obama really wants change... by Jeremy Frombach

Pentagon Recruits Kids Under 17, Violating UN Protocol by Sherwood Ross

Go To Top 50 Most Popular