Torture

Just because there is "Special Rendition" it does not follow there is torture. To put Clinton in the same catagory as Bush II is silly,no it is dishonest and ethically bankrupt. The right and wrong of Special Rendition totally depends on the case and situation. In order to fight a war against terrorism, the government must have some tools. Since the terrorist have no ground rules about the brutal murder of civilian and are told by Ayman al-Zawahri and Adam Yehiye Gadahn that "no Muslim should shed tears for Westerners killed by al-Qaida attacks" which means innocent women and babies murdered on trains and airlines or even young Muslim girls at weddings in Jordan who have nothing to with this war should be mourned. The radical Muslims have no compassion or love for anyone or anything. They are like the god and prophet they worship.

How come all these verbal attacks are always against the West and never against the dark evils of radical Islam such as Hebollah's cowardly hiding behind women and children? This war in Iraq is ridiculous. It has nothing to do with the death struggle with radical Islam, and the torturing of anyone is just to get down on the same despicable level of evil as the evil radical Islamists themselves. If we could "Special Rendition" the whole leadership of the radical Islamist out of whatever country, we would be mortally remiss in our duties to not do that, and I do mean MORTALLY and not morally. If Bush One or Clinton had Special Renditioned Osama ben Laden out of Afghanistan or Sudan, we would not be in the mess with thousand upon thousands of innocent people being murdered by these radicals.

by pratliff94 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 940 comments) on Sunday, September 3, 2006 at 1:53:46 PM