Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 6 (8 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   4 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Why Obama's Social Security Cuts Are Our Wake-Up Call

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 3 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 4/8/13

Become a Fan
  (10 fans)

Others take the opposite tack. They say people "shouldn't be surprised" at the president's cuts given all the signals he's given recently. But wrong is wrong, and surprise has nothing to do with it.

And please stop saying that he hasn't broken any promises. In 2007 he said that "cutting benefits is not the right answer." In 2008 he berated John McCain for "suggesting that the best answer to the growing pressures on Social Security might be to cut cost-of-living adjustments or raise the retirement age." Said candidate Obama: "I will not do either."

As of this writing, the White House website still says that the president "believes that no current beneficiaries should see their basic benefits reduced" (which this budget would do).

Other presidential defenders offer something Digby describes as a "Sophie's Choice" for liberals. They're "telling the progressives that a hostage is going to get shot no matter what: Head Start and food inspections today or the elderly, the sick and the veterans tomorrow and they have to choose which one."

"Why," asks Digby, "should progressives bear that responsibility?" For that matter, why should anyone else?

Things fall apart. The center cannot hold.

The self-described "centrists" supporting this move are especially off-base, since the political center hates the chained CPI. A new AARP poll showed that 69 percent of voters "opposed" or "strongly opposed" the chained CPI, while only 16 percent supported it. A December poll found that 54 percent of voters opposed the chained CPI, with 16 percent favoring it.

The president's chained CPI proposal isn't "centrist." It's far to the right of public opinion.

Left, Right and Center host Matt Miller even mocked "liberal" outrage that the chained CPI is only a small reduction on a macroeconomic level. We called those who use this argument the "mohels of moderation": It's just a tiny cut! Why all the yelling?

Value Village

As Mike Lux says, "your budget represents your values." What is valued in this budget: Compromise at any price? Good press coverage? The approval of Washington's insular "Village," whatever the cost to others?

This budget certainly reinforces false and destructive right-wing messaging: That Social Security should be cut as part of a deficit reduction plan. (It shouldn't.) That government spending hurts the economy, even in hard times. (We know that it helps.) That we can't solve our healthcare-cost problem, so we should shift the burden back onto individuals. (We can solve it, the way other countries have.)

Whatever happens during budget negotiations, the president's proposal is already a huge victory -- for conservative ideology

The Dance

Obama's defenders say the Republicans have insisted that he propose these cuts before they'll consider them. We're told that this bowing gesture will lead to a beautiful pas de deux -- or to a scornful rebuff which will benefit Democrats at the polls.

That makes no sense. When has one party demanded that the other present its ideas -- especially its most unpopular ones -- as if they were its own? What's next: Will they ask the president to propose their Medicare voucher plan? Call for a flat tax? Join the Tea Party?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/the-dumbest-bipartisa

Host of 'The Breakdown,' Writer, and Senior Fellow, Campaign for America's Future


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How to Fix the Fed: Dismiss Dimon, Boot the Bankers, and Can the Corporations

The Top 12 Political Fallacies of 2012

Pawn: The Real George Zimmerman Story

What America Would Look Like If Libertarians Got Their Way

"F" The Bureaucracy! The White House Can Help Homeowners Right Now

The Price of Evil at JPMorgan Chase

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Obama is a Trojan horse.  He does whatever Go... by Textynn N on Tuesday, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:48:16 AM
It is a poor leader who considers his/her people a... by Dennis Kaiser on Tuesday, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:52:27 AM
I read in the paper several months ago that he has... by 911TRUTH on Tuesday, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:46:31 AM
When I called Aetna about this gigantic jump they ... by Herbert Calhoun on Tuesday, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:44:15 PM