Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter
  12
Share on Facebook
  8
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
  5
25 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
6 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

War porn: The new safe sex

Become a Fan
  (96 fans)
By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 3 of 5 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 3   Valuable 3   Supported 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H4 3/29/12

opednews.com

US "kill teams" have deliberately executed random, innocent Afghan civilians, mostly teenagers, for sport, planted weapons on their bodies, and then posed with their corpses as trophies. Not by accident they had been operating out of a base in the same area of the Kandahar massacre.

And we should not forget former top US commander in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, who in April 10, 2010, admitted, bluntly, "We've shot an amazing number of people" who were not a threat to the US or Western civilization.

The Pentagon spins and sells in Afghanistan what it sold in Iraq (and even way back in Vietnam for that matter); the idea that this is a "population-centric counter-insurgency" -- or COIN, to "win hearts and minds", and part of a great nation-building project.

This is a monumental lie. The Obama surge in Afghanistan -- based on COIN -- was a total failure. What replaced it was hardcore, covert, dark war, led by "kill teams" of Special Forces. That implies an inflation of air strikes and night raids. No to mention drone strikes, both in Afghanistan and in Pakistan's tribal areas, whose favorite targets seem to be Pashtun wedding parties.

Incidentally, the CIA claims that since May 2010, ultra-smart drones have killed more than 600 "carefully selected" human targets -- and, miraculously, not a single civilian.

Expect to see this war porn extravaganza celebrated in an orgy of upcoming, joint Pentagon-Hollywood blockbusters. In real life, this is spun by people such as John Nagl, who was on General David Petraeus' staff in Iraq and now runs the pro-Pentagon think-tank Center for New American Security.


The new stellar macho, macho men may be the commandos under the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC). But this is a Pentagon production, which has created, according to Nagl, an "industrial strength counter-terrorism killing machine".

Reality, though, is much more prosaic. COIN techniques, applied by McChrystal, relied on only three components; 24-hour surveillance by drones; monitoring of mobile phones; and pinpointing the physical location of the phones from their signals.

This implies that anyone in an area under a drone watch using a cell phone was branded as a "terrorist," or at least "terrorist sympathizer." And then the focus of the night raids in Afghanistan shifted from "high value targets" -- high-level and mid-level al-Qaeda and Taliban -- to anyone who was branded as helping the Taliban.

In May 2009, before McChrystal arrived, US Special Forces were carrying 20 raids a month. By November, they were 90 a month. By the spring of 2010, they were 250 a month. When McChrystal was fired -- because of a story in Rolling Stone (he was competing with Lady Gaga for the cover; Lady Gaga won) -- and Obama replaced him with Petraeus in the summer of 2010, there were 600 a month. By April 2011, they were more than 1,000 a month.

So this is how it works. Don't even think of using a cell phone in Kandahar and other Afghan provinces. Otherwise, the "eyes in the sky" are going to get you. At the very least you will be sent to jail, along with thousands of other civilians branded as "terrorist sympathizers"; and intelligence analysts will use your data to compile their "kill/capture list" and catch even more civilians in their net.

As for the civilian "collateral damage" of the night raids, they were always presented by the Pentagon as "terrorists." Example; in a raid in Gardez on February 12, 2010, two men were killed; a local government prosecutor and an Afghan intelligence official, as well as three women (two of them pregnant). The killers told the US-North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) command in Kabul that the two men were "terrorists" and the women had been found tied up and gagged. Then the actual target of the raid turned himself in for questioning a few days later, and was released without any charges.

That's just the beginning. Targeted assassination -- as practiced in Afghanistan -- will be the Pentagon's tactic of choice in all future US wars.

Pass the condom, darling

Libya was a major war-porn atrocity exhibition -- complete with a nifty Roman touch of the defeated "barbarian" chief sodomized in the streets and then executed, straight on YouTube.

This, by the way, is exactly what Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, in a lightning visit to Tripoli, had announced less than 48 hours before the fact. Gaddafi should be "captured or killed." When she watched it in the screen of her BlackBerry she could only react with the semantic earthquake "Wow!"

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

Pepe Escobar is the roving correspondent for Asia Times. His regular column, "The Roving Eye," is widely read. He is an analyst for the online news channel Real News, the roving correspondent for Asia Times/Hong Kong, an analyst for RT and (more...)
 
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Putin is driving Washington nuts

It was Putin's missile?

All aboard the New Silk Road(s)

Where is Prince Bandar?

Why Qatar wants to invade Syria

Welcome to the Kurdish Spring

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

that you are not mentioning, such as the 18,000 or... by Skeptic1 on Friday, Mar 30, 2012 at 2:54:18 AM
A dozen hats, but where is your head? 18,000 te... by Ned Lud on Friday, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:07:16 AM
is that they have no real use for objectivity at a... by John Sanchez Jr. on Friday, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:35:40 AM
Would you be kind enough to write an article about... by Daniel Geery on Friday, Mar 30, 2012 at 6:23:12 PM
but  even then we deal with a deliberate delu... by Mark Sashine on Friday, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:09:23 AM
for attempting to penetrate the veil of misinforma... by mhenriday on Sunday, Apr 1, 2012 at 9:32:26 AM