Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   No comments

General News

Vermont on Both Sides of Nuclear Power

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 3 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (25 fans)

During the trial, Prosecutor Brown stayed tightly focused on the trespass itself, mostly avoiding motivation and context.  But after the jury returned with a verdict and it was time for sentencing, Brown argued for a suspended sentence of 30-45 days, on the condition of no further protests and the completion of 100 hours of public service.  He justified the difference between this request and the hundreds of similar cases that were not prosecuted by blaming the six women for taking law enforcement personnel away from post-Irene response. 

As the Rutland Herald's Susan Smallheer reported it:

The case was unusual because it was prosecuted, while hundreds of other, identical cases have gone unprosecuted. 
But after the women were convicted, and set for sentencing, Windham County Deputy State's Attorney Steve Brown said the women's timing -- and the fact that they pulled away needed resources from the police response to Tropical Storm Irene -- needed to be computed into their sentence".

Windham County prosecutors have, for the last 12 years or so, routinely declined to prosecute any protester cases, saying it was a misuse of limited court resources.

The evidence had shown that these women were well known to local authorities and that they required no special police handling.  Brown did not establish that any personnel were actually needed elsewhere when they were arresting the Shut It Down Six, he did not establish how many personal were needed for the arrests, or whether the women could have been left chained to the fence until it was convenient for police to collect them. 

Because he took no questions afterwards, prosecutor Brown could not be asked  whether this case constituted selective prosecution.  Associated Press reporter Dave Gram raised this issue with the prosecutor's office pre-trial, but got no explanation.  Nor apparently did the judge inquire as to why these women were prosecuted when hundreds of other protestors similarly situated legally, had all had their charges dropped -- even some of these defendants on other occasions. 

For their part, the Shut It Down Six rejected community service, arguing that trying to shut down Vermont Yankee was itself community service.  At least some of them invited Judge Wesley to send them to jail.  The Judge refused. 

   How Does a Criminal Court do Justice to Nuclear Risk?

During the trial, as Dusty Miller wrote later: 

Paki Wieland asked Vernon police Chief Mary Beth Hebert if, after the many times she had been called to Vermont Yankee to arrest these aging activists, "do you see us as unrepentant recidivists or persistent women?" 

Officer Hebert smiled warmly, answering in an unmistakably affectionate tone "you are persistent!"

As the women masterfully conducted their own defense, spectators in the court room heard from police officers -  and even VY's head of security -  that the protestors had been consistently respectful and non-violent. Here was another lesson in the patience and courage it takes to act from conscience.

Also during the trial, as the Brattleboro Reformer's Mike Faher reported, Brown had intervened  on the women's behalf and "pointed out that it was allowable for the women to ask each other questions as cross-examination.  [Judge] Wesley agreed and praised Brown's ethics, and the courtroom audience erupted in applause."    

In addition to Crowe, Kehler, and Nestel, the other defendants were Nancy First, 82, and Paki Wieland, 68, both of Northampton, and Ellen Graves of West Springfield. 

The Shut It Down Six have 30 days from the verdict to appeal. 

As the judge thanked the jury for struggling with the case, he commented: "This has been a difficult trial with difficult issues of conscience" -- even if he hadn't allowed the Shut It Down Six to argue those issues conscientiously.   The judge also commented that: "There are certain criminal behaviors for which the criminal justice system is a pretty crude instrument." 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

Vermonter living in Woodstock: elected to five terms (served 20 years) as side judge (sitting in Superior, Family, and Small Claims Courts); public radio producer, "The Panther Program" -- nationally distributed, three albums (at CD Baby), some (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Nuclear Perceptions Fight Reality

Fukushima Spiking All of a Sudden

Vermont Asks: "What the Fukushima"?

Fukushima Meltdowns: Global Denial At Work

Military-Industrial Complex Owns Vermont

Accountability in Vermont?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments