Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (7 comments)

Utter failure of election transparency in Monterey County

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (3 fans)   -- Page 3 of 5 page(s)

opednews.com

We went back to the central tabulator observation window and reviewed the Sequoia version number info. I then asked that they show what programs were loaded into the machine either by reviewing the list of programs available in the operating system menus or under the "add/remove programs" function listing all loaded programs.

Ms. Tulett refused this request at first, and then agreed to consult with her counsel on this point. We agreed this was reasonable; according to Ms. Tulett her attorney was expected any moment. She said that since nothing was going on in the room at that time, no observation was needed and we were required to wait out in the lobby.

SNEAKING IN TO THE COMPUTER ROOM

From the lobby, we could see the front door of the central tabulator room "sideways," but we could not see into the room. The room was also accessible from the rear (through the warehouse).

After about an hour and a half, Ms. Lane, Mr. Riley and I agreed that matters had become boring. We decided to propose giving Ms. Tulett my cell phone number and ask her to call me when she had counsel available so that we could come to some mutual understanding of what EC15004 was all about and what the examination would consist of. Meanwhile we'd go scope out some precincts.

We proposed this plan to Joe Ripley, one of the mid-level staffers. He agreed this was reasonable, and set off to find Ms. Tulett to discuss this with her.


However, rather than going to Ms. Tulett's office, he went straight back into the central tabulator area and entered the sealed room.

Alarmed, I asked myself what Ms. Tulett might be doing in there, and didn't like the answers I was coming up with. I quickly looked around for Frank Foley - he is that office's best computer technician and his cubicle seat is very visible. He was nowhere to be seen.

Mr. Ripley came out and said something regarding Ms. Tulett's availability – I don't know exactly what. Masking my anxiety as best I could, I politely asked Mr. Ripley permission to come back and look into the central tabulator room. He delayed for a moment, went back over there, opened the door, told us that nobody was in there right now, and I said "right, but I just want to look for a second." He shrugged and led us back there to the viewing area.

"ADD & REMOVE PROGRAMS" ON THE SCREEN

  What I had noticed was that one of the secondary monitors showing observers what was going on had something on it – an open MS-Windows program of some sort. I couldn't tell more than that from 40 feet away. As George and I got closer, it was obviously the Microsoft Windows "Add/Remove Programs" function.

I asked George if he saw it too - "yep." At this point I was beyond "angry." I am sure I said something to the effect of "those bastards have kept us cooling our heels out there while they snuck in the back of the room and tampered with exactly what we had made a request to see, out of our sight." I will confess here and now to using at least some profanity...but not without cause.

I then pulled out my cell phone, turned on its two-megapixel camera function and photographed the "add/remove programs" screen – unfortunately that picture didn't come out.

CONFISCATION AND ARREST EFFORTS

Mr. Ripley and Mr. Valenzuela went simultaneously ballistic. Mr. Valenzuela demanded my phone; I flatly refused. He then ordered me out of the building – I refused this as well, in both cases firmly and politely. Mr. Valenzuela then told me police were being called and threatened me with arrest.

They also asked the other three members of our party to leave, as "nothing was going on" - they consistently claimed that observation was only allowed whenever THEY determined that there was something to observe. I reminded them that they had now been caught going in and out the back way and tampering with the system; they shrugged that off and again told everybody to leave.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

http://www.blackboxvoting.org

Bev Harris is executive director of Black Box Voting, Inc. an advocacy group committed to restoring citizen oversight to elections.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

failure by Archie on Saturday, Jun 7, 2008 at 12:49:20 AM
Denial..... by Mark E. Smith on Saturday, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:07:49 AM
Election Fraud by Mad Jayhawk on Saturday, Jun 7, 2008 at 9:16:24 AM
Missing the point by Bev Harris on Saturday, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:31:57 PM
I wish you luck by Mad Jayhawk on Saturday, Jun 7, 2008 at 10:30:59 PM
Actually, there is no excuse whatsoever for Monterey by Bev Harris on Sunday, Jun 8, 2008 at 10:25:05 AM
Land of Rules and Laws? by Frank gr on Sunday, Jun 8, 2008 at 1:46:44 PM

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2012, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum