What’s new is that this study shows what happened to the orthodox Jews who were left behind after the Romans ran their Zionist rulers out of the region. I hope you’re sitting down because you are not going to believe what it showed. The orthodox Hebrews from the Land of Milk and Honey kept doing what they’ve had always done, farmed and worked their trades while keeping with the humble traditions Moses gave them. As the nation of Islam expanded through the region in the first millennium gobbling up all the other faiths, they became Muslins. Then they hung out doing what they had always done for another thousands years only following the laws of Mohammad instead of Moses, which includes the Laws of Moses anyway.
Do I even have to say it? Let me make sure I make this clear. The Zionist descendents of David left the old kingdom if Israel as it ceased to exist after the Roman Empire put an end to it. But it was still the Land of Milk and Honey to the orthodox Jews who remained there. Then orthodox Jews there converted to Islam while Zionism spread through many other cultures where a true bloodline connection to the tribe of Judah was forever lost. Then the new European followers of Judaism took up believing in themselves as the true descendents of Moses after World War II and invaded the biblical Holy Land and reestablished the Zionist kingdom of Israel there while maintaining a civil war status with the Palestinians until they could outnumber them in elections, which has never come.
So the truth is that the Palestinians are the true descendants of the Israelites who followed Moses out of Egypt. The point, and how it’s relevant to this article, is that Israel has been shown in the OECD report to be the worst of the worst nations when it comes to hoarding the money of its citizens who created it. And the most powerful and wealthiest ruling party in the country is the Likud party who has a Zionist agenda to rebuild the Kingdom of David and Solomon. So they justify why they steal so much money from their people on the basis that they need to support their biblical agenda even though they’re not at all related to the people in the bible that the prophecies they believe in are written about, the Palestinians are.
I am not trying to illustrate this point to make an argument against Jews or Israel. I’m merely pointing out how old belief systems that have been around since long before we had the kind of information technology that allows us to flesh out the historical truth about their past much more competently than ever before. Take for instance the belief in capitalism as being the true American way with anything else being socialism where this kind of ideology is being used to excuse why money managers here write such big paychecks for themselves while leaving only the crumbs for the rest of us, which we only get to eat as long as we agree to pay for them back our money along with the interest and taxes they put on it.
It always sends my mind into a state of bewilderment when I here conservatives talk about how anything outside of their capitalist system is anti-American. It’s as if they don’t know the history of the same dollar they worship or that of whose portrait adorns it, at least he’s always been on the dollar until recently where now every three months a new dollar coin will be minted with different presidents of the United States stamped on them.
In order to understand our capitalist government, you have to know the history behind the creation of the dollar, the one with George Washington’s portrait on it. Washington was a British soldier. He actually created the circumstances that lead to the Revolutionary War being possible when he was 21 years old serving under Lieutenant Governor of Virginia Robert Dinwiddie. He accidently ambushed a French scouting party which started a war between the French and British that ended with the French being pushed largely up into what is now Canada.
What used to enable the Americas to be ruled by kings residing on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean was the fact the French and British were both here competing for land and power so wherever one of them became weak in any particular part of the land, the other would usurp their control of the region. This kept the generational inhabitants of the 13 colonies from being able to revolt because whenever they did, they simply opened up a hole for a new royal force to march through. But with Washington having created the circumstances that gave control of most of the colonies to Britain, overrunning them relieved all royal forces of their power south of the St Lawrence River because there was no one left to fill the power vacuum left behind when the British were chased back home except the Continental Congress.
When the Revolutionary War was won, it was expected that Washington would be crowed king of America. American freedom was born when he declined and went back to his plantation and grow tobacco, or have his slaves do it for him. That’s when the American dream began because it was the first time in mankind’s historyf that a civilized people had been free from being ruled by a monarchy. So Americans started doing whatever they wanted to do while Washington told his subordinates and the Continental Congress to do whatever they wanted, set up a government and rule, elect a king, whatever made them happy.
The problem with his approach was twofold 1) the state of finances of the loyalists who had sided with Britain during the war 2) and who was going to represent the head of government whose portrait traditionally adorns currency as a statement of his standing behind the value of the note which gives it power in international trade.
Back then, trade was done between kings. Everything traded was taken from the people who produced it as the kings owned people like cogs in his own personal God anointed money making machines. If the newly formed United States wanted to engage an international, we needed to put the head of our leader on our currency so other kings would know who was going to held accountable if we violated the trust put behind our money contracts. Since Washington had won the war, he was the only leader respected enough to being able to back up our new currency.
But Washington had another idea for how he thought our banking system should be set up. Of course the loyalist, who our first treasurer Alexander Hamilton represented the interests of, wanted to put Washington on our currency and be allowed for all their wealth and property to remain in tact so they could carry on their business as usual only without having to deal with the king of England breathing down their necks. That’s what freedom and capitalism was to them, having money and power but no oversight from a king.
To them, the Constitution was written by and for them. They didn’t see uneducated working class people as deserving of its meaning. In fact only men of means were allowed to vote or run for office in the early years of this country’s founding. They even discreetly saw the king as beneath them because they were the conduit through which the king was able to extract his wealth from after the working class produced it. They were like the Jews in Iran are to the president Ahmajinadad whose says the Iranian people would not have a country without Jews knowing how to run the government and administer their economy.
In the interim years before Washington made up his mind about what to do with the economy, or had it made up for him, our economy flourished with their being no national monetary standard or system to justify the value of currency. The thirteen colonies simply started printing up money and using it to induce trade while hundreds of other currencies were printed by anyone who could get consumers to trust it had a value. As much as you would think this would cause total chaos, the economy boomed instead because everyone had an incentive to be productive since there was always enough money flowing through the economy to insure plentiful opportunities for profitable trade no matter whose picture or signature was on the paper that accommodated it.
So Washington was more inclined to have the government simply print up money and spend it, lend it, or give it away, whatever it took to keep enough money flowing through the economy to inspire everyone to get out and become part of it. That was Washington’s dream of American freedom. But Hamilton and the loyalists had other ideas.
Running the economy Washington’s way would have leveled the playing field between money managers and the working people who made the money in the first place. Traditionally under the European capitalistic system that we adopted, workers had never been allowed to keep their fair share of what they earned, that is how rich people wind up with more than they deserve, they have everyone else’s money. Washington’s economy would have forced rich people to compete with working class people by doing real work, and against the same labor forces they used to have total economic power over.
Washington refused to give in to Hamilton’s repeated pleas and scare tactics for a few years. But Hamilton constantly reminded Washington that the international community would not do business with his kind of currency. Washington’s response however was that we didn’t need to trade with outsiders because the Americas are so rich in natural resources that it would be the kings of other already spoiled lands who would bow to his policies to be able to trade with us. The deal breaker was Washington’s fear that the British would mount a navy against us and retake the United States. He desperately wanted a Navy but we didn’t have the expertise to build one. So he would either have to steal one or go into debt to buy it instead.
