3
3
3
LOYAL, WI 54446
Defendant
MOTION OF PAUL MARTIN GRIEPENTROG SUI JURIS
FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT
Paul Martin Griepentrog, pro se sui juris, hereby requests leave to file a brief of amicus curiae in support of the defendant in this case. I am uniquely positioned to comment on the issue before this Court. As one who has studied the ramifications of “Premises Registration”, and who finds himself in the same situation as Emanuel J. Miller. See attached affidavit for details, (Verification of Administrative Admissions).
As indicated in the affidavit the named respondents failed to meet their fiduciary duty pursuant to 5 USC 556.
In Exhibit H. Dr. Paul McGraw indicates he believes that the Amish cannot meet step two because of their belief that, premises registration could lead to animal identification as there is no existing statute to affirm this contention. However the enclosed document NAIS Implementation Cooperative Agreement Work Plan for the WI DATCP, and the USDA/APHIS/ VS clearly indicates the plan includes individual animal identification. This document stands as a paid contract for the implementation of NAIS. See the USDA NAIS DRAFT, Strategic Plan 2005 to 2009 enclosed for full details of this program.
Whereas the State fails its prima facie case by not having established that a habendum clause is present on title deed to the property, which would determine or define the scope or existence of premises.
“Premises” in International law, includes a place and a conveyance. The mandate of conveyance under Premises Registration clearly violates Article 1, Section 14 of the Wisconsin Constitution which states all lands within the state are declared to be allodial, and feudal tenures are prohibited.
This information is given to the best of my belief and knowledge so help me YHVH , on this date December 14, 2008.
______________________________
Paul-Martin:Griepentrog pro se sui juris.
