Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 5 (7 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   10 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Vanity of Perfectionism

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 3 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 7/27/12

- Advertisement -

Bush then followed the advice of neoconservative advisers -- rushing through a retaliatory invasion of Afghanistan and letting al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden slip away -- so the U.S. military could move on to invading Iraq, which had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks.

The Iraq invasion and resulting chaos led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis -- and ironically helped al-Qaeda establish a foothold in the Sunni areas of Iraq. Meanwhile, Bush's neglect of the Afghan conflict allowed al-Qaeda's allies, the Taliban, to stage a comeback there.

If Gore had been president, it's very possible 9/11 never would have happened and -- even if it did -- Gore would have almost surely responded in a less blunderbuss way. Gore also had a strong record for respecting the constitutional rights of Americans and the principles of international law, while Bush treated both as inconveniencies to be ignored or overridden.

Bush also enacted more tax cuts weighted toward the wealthy, blowing a huge hole in the federal budget and hollowing out more of the middle class. Bush appointed two more right-wing justices to the U.S. Supreme Court, John Roberts and Samuel Alito, key votes in the 2010 Citizens United case, which opened the floodgates to special interest spending to buy elections.

But perhaps most significantly, Gore cared about the looming existential crisis of global warming, while Bush treated the issue with disdain, thus contributing to the hostility now expressed by right-wingers who depict the science on climate change as a myth and as part of some grand socialist conspiracy.

If the planet continues toward climate devastation -- with ice caps melting, sea levels rising and droughts disrupting food supplies -- a key turning point will have been the presidency of George W. Bush, rather than the presidency of Al Gore.

While many institutions and individuals share the blame for installing Bush in the White House, part of the responsibility must fall on the Green Party and Ralph Nader, who helped Bush get close enough to steal Florida's electoral votes and thus the presidency. The bitter irony is that the one major mark that the American Green Party may have on history is enabling an anti-environmental president to put the world on course for ecological destruction.

Yes, I know Nader and the Green Party deny all responsibility for this catastrophe; they point their fingers at everybody else including Al Gore. But their arguments are sophistry. The truth is they ignored many timely warnings about the danger that ultimately came to pass; they knew they were playing chicken with the planet; their reckless words (about "Tweedle-dum and Tweedle-dee" and "not a dime's worth of difference") were unsafe at any speed.

- Advertisement -

Obama's Reelection?

Which brings us to 2012 and what many on the Left insist is another meaningless election between two politicians whose only differences are cosmetic. We are told again that it doesn't matter whether President Obama gets a second term or if Mitt Romney and the Tea-Party Republicans take full control of the U.S. government.

We're told that elections simply don't matter, even if these right-wing Republicans will likely gut what's left of the New Deal and the Great Society; will further concentrate wealth at the top; will free Wall Street from even the modest burden of the Dodd-Frank regulations; will drive more middle-class families into poverty; will let thousands of Americans die prematurely without health care; will put neocons firmly back in charge of U.S. foreign policy with plans to extend the Afghan War and start possible new wars in Syria and Iran.

After all, Barack Obama has not been perfect on these issues. He has blood on his own hands. He has made many compromises. He is far from the socialist that some Tea Partiers claim he is. I'm often told by progressives that they are "disappointed" in Obama as if their feelings are the most important part of this equation.

It does seem that some on the Left will only be satisfied with perfection. They act more like critics whose job is to find fault with a politician than as participants in a political process. "Obama should have done this; Obama should have done that."

- Advertisement -

Indeed, some behave as if what's truly important is that they be recognized as staking out the "perfect" -- the most uncompromising -- position, regardless of how impractical that stance might be or what harmful side effects it might have.

This vanity of perfectionism sometimes takes precedence even if it may help empower an unstable or incompetent U.S. leader who would implement horribly destructive policies that could kill millions.

What some on the Left fail to grasp is that who is elected President of the United States -- even with the deep gradations of gray among the major-party choices -- can mean life or death to people around the planet, even life or death for the planet itself.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at It's also available at more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The CIA/Likud Sinking of Jimmy Carter

What Did US Spy Satellites See in Ukraine?

Ron Paul's Appalling World View

Ronald Reagan: Worst President Ever?

The Disappearance of Keith Olbermann

A Perjurer on the US Supreme Court


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
the above arguments miss the point.  The real... by Mark Sashine on Friday, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:14:48 PM
Robert Parry's article should be mandatory reading... by michael payne on Saturday, Jul 28, 2012 at 5:20:03 PM
but also nothing is  only ours. The above arg... by Mark Sashine on Saturday, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:13:17 PM
Did you ever stop to think that those people who t... by michael payne on Saturday, Jul 28, 2012 at 7:26:41 PM
...............and ask a myriad of good questions,... by Robert P. Philipps on Saturday, Jul 28, 2012 at 7:43:14 PM
the above author  wrote a huge article justif... by Mark Sashine on Saturday, Jul 28, 2012 at 7:46:02 PM
That's what America really needs in one of the mos... by michael payne on Saturday, Jul 28, 2012 at 8:15:31 PM
I will offer you  help and place to stay. Hop... by Mark Sashine on Saturday, Jul 28, 2012 at 8:40:09 PM
Mr. Parry, your article was most certainly informa... by Amy Schreiner on Sunday, Jul 29, 2012 at 10:01:29 AM
Nor do I think that Romney would declare the NDAA ... by Amy Schreiner on Sunday, Jul 29, 2012 at 10:49:20 AM