3
2
2
S. Windisch: Regarding your theories, can you give us a brief thumbnail description of them? How do they differ from "classical" / commonly accepted electrical and magnetic "Laws" / Theory?
R. Ainslie: The theories differ from classical by proposing a fundamental particle that shapes the universe. Composites of this particle create matter. Stable composites form the observable universe. But energy itself is exchanged at this fundamental particle level which is removed from our dimensions. Effectively I think it is the dark energy from dark matter that is identified by our astrophysicists.
S. Windisch: Following-up on that, where specifically do you suspect, or believe, the "excess" anomalous energy seen in your Circuit is actually coming from? How do the "Zipons", your name for the new proposed particle, fit into this?
R. Ainslie: When electron currents flow, when a path is forged through electric circuitry, they also induce a corresponding imbalance in the inductive components of that circuit. This is widely known. It is seen as "stored' energy. But the difference to convention and this model is subtle. This stored energy establishes an imbalance in the circuit material in that resistor or that element. Being imbalanced these fields also require an established state of balance. And given a chance to re-establish this balance, a chance to reduce this experienced and measurable potential difference, they in turn induce a second flow of current, in anti-phase to the first flow of current. So, provided that there is a path available in the circuit, it too can return its extruded fields back to it's own supply source being the resistor or the element itself. In other words there are two sources of energy in every one cycle of current flow through a closed circuit. The one is induced from the supply source, the other is induced from the resistor in series with that supply. Both have independent supply or energy sources and both are able to reduce their potential difference provided that some circuit path is made available to do this.
The availability of the path is in the circuit design itself. Here the source battery induces the first current path cycle, clockwise. Then that flow is interrupted by opening the switch and "taking away' the required closed path. But simultaneously there is a new path opened for the second cycle where the resistor transfers its energy onto a second path - anticlockwise. At fast frequencies, the two cycles are able to resonate against each other, like a swing that is first pushed in one direction and then in the other. And the net result is that the energy that is applied from the source is then returned to the source. The energy that is applied from the circuit is returned to the circuit. But in both cases that energy is simply strings of zipons that are trying to get back to their respective sources in order to diminish their experienced imbalance or their measured potential differences. So under these special circuit conditions there is not only a conservation of energy, being the zipons themselves which return to their respective sources, but there is also a conservation of charge in the supply which is then continually recharged during the second cycle of the switched circuit.
But what then explains the "heat" that is measured to be dissipated at the source? Here, again in line with observation but possibly not in line with classical thought, it is proposed that the zipons that are not extruded from the material of the circuit components, remain in the material, in the inductive wire itself. But the essential symmetry of their fields has been broken through the extrusion of some of its fields. This break results in a state of chaos that excites these fields into a cascade of zipons that re-congregate within that material in their attempt to regain that state of balance.
It
is further proposed that the size of the zipons relates to its
velocity. In a field they are cold and fast and small and entirely
undetectable. But break those symmetries, and in a precise and
inverse proportionate ratio the zipons become hot and slow and
manifest. This, in turn results in some of those zipons decaying into
photons and then radiating away from the resistive material itself.
This results in the systematic degradation of the bound state of the
resistor, which is seen as material fatigue.
S. Windisch: How would
you like to see your discovery used? What would be the desired path
for this circuit / effect to take? Assuming it gains acceptance and
greater awareness, what should happen next with it?
R. Ainslie: We need to firm up on the mathematics to predict the effect and get it better exploited. But to do this also requires research into the differing materials and components required to optimize the effect. I suspect there will be the requirement to introduce different types of inductive materials. But the real advantage to the model is that it points to the potential of magnetic interfacing to enable a continual current supply. That branch of research will be both exotic and expensive.
The Effect, and the Significance
When asked to reflect on this endeavor and experience of replicating and verifying the Rosemary Ainslie Circuit, Open Source Researcher and key project member Glen Lettenmaier, who has worked countless hours over the last several months building, testing, and recording his positive results with the Circuit (often through a barrage of unfounded criticism from the skeptics and naysayers), summed it up this way:
"What brings most to mind on this project are two things, the first being a movie called "The Medicine Man' where an individual's best efforts were totally lost due to varying circumstances and had to be re-found, and the second was the skepticism and refusal from so many, all seemingly knowledgeable but going by their education and not willing to do any experiments on their own... similar to a quote from one of our greatest from years ago:
"The scientists from Franklin to Morse were clear thinkers and did not produce erroneous theories. The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane. Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments and they wander off through equation after equation and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.' - Nikola Tesla ("Modern Mechanix and Inventions', July 1934)"
Indeed. The dis-connect between what the mainstream claims is "Possible", and what the properly collected empirical data presented regarding the Rosemary Ainslie Circuit demonstrates, is quite wide, to a point approaching embarrassment for the mainstream scientific community. It is possible for that reason and others, that there will be much resistance to accepting this data at first: It has not been sanctioned by any mainstream institution (yet), nor was it collected by tenured scientists. And it has not been funded by anyone. It has been done outside of the mainstream, by those who are not under any obligations or restraints due to what Dr. Eugene Mallove once called: "The Politics of Science". However, the entire point of this Open Source endeavor is to gain the help of the scientific mainstream in further studying the effect so the planet and Humanity can benefit from it. Hopefully this basic imperative that goes deep to our instinctual need to protect our children and grandchildren, will win out over any "emotional" or "political" issues mainstream scientists may have to viewing this discovery objectively.
Rosemary Ainslie has had great difficulty in getting this information out to the world over the years. Despite the many proofs provided, she was utterly ignored by the South Africa and international academic community. One of her most active original team members died suddenly. Others in the original Team simply lost heart and dropped out when it was realized that despite their successes they had met with an implacable stone wall; and simply went back to their normal lives. Yet the renewed interest in 2009 has rejuvenated this Cause and has added weight to the Discovery. And the new data, collected with properly accepted means and method, should, in a "real world" governed by Reason and the desire for honest scientific achievement for the betterment of Humankind, be more than enough to gain widespread academic interest.
If it turns out that the present proofs are somehow not enough, then more can and will be provided. Because this Circuit, this Effect, is not going away. It is now in the Public Record, Open Sourced for the world to see. Millions of poor and middle class people may someday soon benefit from the great energy efficiently that has been positively demonstrated to be possible here. Eventually, the effects seen in the Rosemary Ainslie Circuit will not be limited to "heating", and can be utilized for greater power efficiencies in many varied applications once the studies progress, and understanding grows.
