Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 2   Must Read 1   Interesting 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (42 comments)

The Great Enemy of the Truth

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (23 fans)   -- Page 3 of 6 page(s)

opednews.com

And this does not include whatever lead fragments might be in JFK's body from the passage of that "magic bullet."

That is if CE 399 ever passed through President Kennedy.

The magic performed by this bullet inside of JFK's body is every bit as amazing as that which it is supposed to have performed after it left.

CE 399 supposedly entered the President's body at a 45-60 degree downward angle (affidavit of retired FBI agent Francis X. O'Neill to House Select Committee on Assassinations, p. 4), leaving "a 7 x 4 millimeter oval wound." This wound was "Situated on the upper right posterior thorax just above the upper border of the scapula"This wound is measured to be 14 cm. from the tip of the right acromion process and 14 cm. below the tip of the right mastoid process." (Warren Report: Appendix IX; Autopsy Report and Supplemental Report; Clinical Record, Autopsy Protocol.)

We are then told that this "magic bullet" tumbled through JFK's upper torso and lower neck, missing blood vessels, bone and muscle; leaving the other organs in that area of the body untouched, except:

"the apex (supra-clavicular portion) of the right pleural cavity. In this region there is contusion of the parietal pleura and of the extreme apical portion of the right upper lobe of the lung. In both instances the diameter of contusion and ecchymosis at the point of maximal involvement measures 5 cm. Both the visceral and parietal pleura are intact overlying these areas of trauma." (Warren Report: Appendix IX; Autopsy Report and Supplemental Report; Clinical Record, Autopsy Protocol.)

In other words, there is a bruise about two inches across in the area of the upper right lung.

After this fantastic journey through JFK's body, CE 399 then exited the President's body, leaving a wound which could be mistaken by the trauma team at Parkland Memorial Hospital--who were experienced with gunshot wounds--to mistake it for an entrance wound when they performed a tracheotomy. Then CE 399 continued on its merry way, making up for the lack of damage it did to JFK internally, with John Connally's horrific wounds.

A miraculous bullet with a sense of balancing the books.

In order to believe the "magic bullet theory," we have to believe that it not only exercised non-bullet like behavior in striking Governor Connally, but that it exhibited non-bullet like behavior as it tumbled through President Kennedy. This amazing projectile tumbled through more than 300 degrees of arc, missing veins, arteries, vital organs, muscles, and bones, and then exited through JFK's throat, causing only a two inch bruise on the upper right lung.

"The missile path through the fascia and musculature cannot be easily proved." (Warren Report: Appendix IX; Autopsy Report and Supplemental Report; Clinical Record, Autopsy Protocol.)

Wrong adverb: it should be "cannot possibly be proved."

The autopsy at Bethesda never undertook a dissection of JFK's throat or back wounds to see if there was a bullet track from one to the other, which is standard procedure for an autopsy involving a suspected through and through bullet wound. It was simply assumed that the bullet hole in the back exited through the wound in the President's throat. In fact, the only examinations of the back wound were when Dr. Humes stuck his gloved pinkie finger in it, and later Dr. Finck, when he initially examined the wound with a metal probe. Both of these examinations indicated that the back wound was quite shallow, penetrating no more than three or four inches.

The pathologists were able to connect the back and throat wounds with a metal probe, only after the lungs had been removed.

The failure to dissect JFK's back and throat wounds to prove that they were made by the same projectile, turns the Warren Commission findings concerning the "magic bullet," as CE 399 has been called, into nothing but wildest speculation, not what a forensic pathologist or a court of law would call "best evidence."

Any defense attorney worth his salt would object to testimony that the back wound was the entrance wound, while the throat wound was the exit wound of the same bullet, as incompetent. The evidence presented by the trauma team at Parkland, and the failure of the pathologists at Bethesda to dissect the wound tracks, would provide absolutely no legal basis, and only wildest speculation, for such a supposition.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

 

Richard Girard is an increasingly radical representative of the disabled and disenfranchised members of America's downtrodden, who suffers from bipolar disorder (type II or type III, the professionals do not agree). He has put together a team to (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
42 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Fascinating! Thanks again, Richard by Margaret Bassett on Wednesday, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:44:37 PM
Great summary by Truth Excavator on Wednesday, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:07:46 PM
The driver did it. by daveys on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:42:36 PM
The driver did it. by daveys on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:18:57 PM
It is always... by Richard Girard on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:58:34 PM
Last true President? by Darrin Kellogg on Monday, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:02:54 AM
You are welcome Margaret! by Richard Girard on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:49:18 PM
Another JFK by Your Friend Fairpay on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 6:45:52 PM
Entertaining article but harly enlightening by Paul May on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:36:02 PM
I look at Mr. May 's comment and think of by Margaret Bassett on Friday, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:23:49 AM
Bit confused by Paul May on Friday, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:33:04 AM
More on JFK by David Wrightsman on Friday, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:25:53 AM
Response to Mr. Wrightsman by Paul May on Friday, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:02:44 AM
Change of motorcade route by Darrin Kellogg on Friday, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:44:35 PM
Mr. Kellogg by Paul May on Saturday, Mar 6, 2010 at 8:07:48 AM
Mr. May--if that is your name, which I doubt; by Richard Girard on Saturday, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:29:50 PM
Let's be serious by Paul May on Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:24:51 PM
As promised my answer. by Richard Girard on Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:01:52 PM
The obviousness of more than one shooter by Darrin Kellogg on Sunday, Mar 7, 2010 at 11:51:38 PM
Wrong again! by Paul May on Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:36:07 PM
There is absolutely no physical evidence..." by daveys on Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:48:56 PM
And I still made it under my self-imposed time limit by Richard Girard on Saturday, Mar 13, 2010 at 5:10:01 PM
You're kidding by Paul May on Sunday, Mar 14, 2010 at 11:19:01 AM
No sir, quit putting words in my mouth... by Richard Girard on Monday, Mar 15, 2010 at 5:48:46 PM
Mr. Girard, do you lie without thinking? by Paul May on Monday, Mar 15, 2010 at 6:34:13 PM
Except it is not Just Prouty you Propagandist by Richard Girard on Tuesday, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:26:23 PM
One can only laugh at the continued ignorance of Mr. Girard by Paul May on Tuesday, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:29:18 PM
More on Prouty by Paul May on Tuesday, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:38:13 PM
Was he lying under oath? by Darrin Kellogg on Tuesday, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:09:09 PM
My retort: One by one by Darrin Kellogg on Tuesday, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:49:02 PM
Response to Mr. Kellogg... by Paul May on Tuesday, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:03:54 PM
It is open to debate by Darrin Kellogg on Wednesday, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:28:32 AM
What is so seemingly distasteful...... by Natalie Oberman on Sunday, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:17:15 AM
Because the preponderance of evidence... by Richard Girard on Monday, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:20:34 PM
Be careful by Darrin Kellogg on Wednesday, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:48:32 AM
Your prescripton doesn't mean cure by Darrin Kellogg on Wednesday, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:37:48 AM
Good article by Nick van Nes on Sunday, Mar 7, 2010 at 7:15:33 PM
Here come the truthers by Natalie Oberman on Monday, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:47:32 AM
Dear Ms. Oberman by Richard Girard on Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:52:13 PM
Who is this Oberman woman? by daveys on Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:44:30 PM
Who is this daveys guy? by Paul May on Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:49:32 PM
WHATEVER. by daveys on Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:02:06 PM