Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 3   Must Read 2   Valuable 2   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 8/29/11:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (16 comments)

Teabaggers; Children of the Sixties?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (7 fans)   -- Page 3 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

Most articles and amendments to The Constitution of The United States were written for the benefit of its citizens and, more specifically, to ensure that none of its citizens were excluded from participating in American governance.   Granted, the founders lived in a time when some human beings weren't even considered as such.   In the beginning, voting was the exclusive right of white males who owned property.   The fact that John Adams, the second president of The United States, served only one term, was one piece of evidence that even white male land owners didn't believe in an exclusionary version of representative democracy.   Adams, if given the latitude, may have introduced a monarchy into the United States.   At any rate, he would have done nothing to open up participation to all citizens of The United States.

We didn't see many posters bearing quotes and/or images of John Adams during the protests of the '60s and early '70s.   Those protests supported a more open, more transparent and less violent society.

Teabaggers' protests, although they may at times look like the protests of 30-40 years ago, have almost nothing in common with those past protests.   Teabaggerss' protests are subsidized by the very kinds of people that the protests of the 60s and 70s targeted.   Teabaggers want to allow states to close their societies if that's what states want to do.   Teabaggers want to protect the rights of the very wealthy, although many on the level of those who do the protesting don't believe that truth.   Teabaggers don't want the wealthy so called "job creators" taxed or regulated because the "job creators" will not create jobs.   Teabaggers have not looked at recent history and seen that the tax cuts that the "job creators" were given by The Regime, otherwise known as the Bush Administration, did many things, but they did not help create jobs.   In fact, job loss was prolific during those eight years.

Nonetheless, teabaggers have hijacked the spirit of the protests which took place in the 60s and early 70s while rallying against the substance of the earlier protests.   They've insulted what were real grass roots protests which favored the rights of all people of all colors and all ethnicities.   The wealthy greedheads who started this present teabagger movement have appealed to the darker side of human nature and we should cut them absolutely no slack.   Those who participate in the rallies and protests should also be cut no slack as they are, apparently, either racist enough to agree with their masters or too unaware of what's going on to be taken seriously.

Power to the people!

To friendship,

Michael

"A conservative is a man who sits and thinks, mostly sits." - Woodrow Wilson

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Michael Bonanno is an associate editor for OpEdNews.

He is also a published poet, essayist and musician who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Bonanno is a political progressive, not a Democratic Party apologist. He believes it's (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
16 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

At Least Bring a Message by Michael Bonanno on Monday, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:07:52 PM
Don't Confuse Teabaggers with Counter Culture by Arman Matthews on Monday, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:43:45 PM
Term: Teabaggers by Donna Clifford on Monday, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:14:21 PM
First Time I Came Across TPs by Michael Dewey on Thursday, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:03:58 AM
Was My Position Really Unclear? by Michael Bonanno on Monday, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:34:56 PM
Lost Rights? by Timothy Gatto on Monday, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:34:02 PM
Children of the 60's??? I don't think so by Arianna Norris-Landry on Monday, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:54:33 PM
You're Right; My Perfection has Been Taken From Me by Michael Bonanno on Tuesday, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:16:18 AM
Teabaggers by Phil Linehan on Tuesday, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:37:44 PM
An Alternative to "Teabaggers" by Dan Mage on Tuesday, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:12:31 PM
In the Sixties we called them "Hawks" and "Squares" by Eugene Nunn on Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:05:38 PM
I'm all for Anyone who is Pissed Off at Anything by Michael Dewey on Thursday, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:28:09 AM
I'm For Anyone Who Plays the Guitar and Sings as Well as You by Michael Bonanno on Thursday, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:59:21 AM
No Not Me by Michael Dewey on Thursday, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:06:05 AM
Tweet: Teabaggers; Children of the Sixties?: http://bit.ly/qqVJPy by Michael Dewey on Thursday, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:29:19 AM
The Dirty Hippies Were Right by Michael Dewey on Thursday, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:10:17 AM