Tags for This Article:

Bush GW (2257)  Bush Crimes (1448)  Propaganda (1172)  Lies Bush (1134)  Bush Liar-in-Chief (907)  Bush Admin (821)  Bush Denier-in-Chief (479)  Bush Lies (138)  McClellan (58)  McClellan (46)  Dubya Related (25) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...)  (less...)
Add to My Group
May 29, 2008 at 09:02:04

Headlined on 5/29/08:
Post Mortem on Scott McClellan (Part 1)

by Bill Burkett     Page 3 of 4 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

He was first a bagman in the tradition of the Bush organization.  He was Ari’s bagman.  Everyone in the media liked him because he was approachable, and the media adopt a methodology of using these good guys on the edge to pilfer information as they can, and gain access as they must. 

Under a constant threat of cutting off access, Karen Hughes had converted a kennel of hunting dogs (the media) into a gaggle of lapdogs. 

She gave them tidbits as she desired.   

Of course it should be forensically surprising that after being converted from hunters to being spoon fed, the campaign and later the White House Press Corps got in line and waited for their next meal.  Instead of competing for the next nugget of hidden truth or background, we became accustomed to a steady dribble press releases, talking points, and vanity pieces.  Judith Miller and others that have not been publicly called on it, were given outlines of stories at ‘friendly’ orchestrated lunches, dinners and social events. 

This was Texas “Good old boy 101” but somehow the WH Press corps was enjoying the feast and forgot their work ethic. 

Propaganda. 

Hence the accurate and correct depiction of Scott McClellan. 

Of course the talking heads and pundits who seek to clear themselves of responsibility don’t give the lead up or back story that makes them culpable or complicit. 

A Presidential campaign or even bigger, a Presidency is a cash cow for writers, politico’s and junkies.  For those that can’t do anything else, it’s also a ticket to stardom in the land of self importance and aggrandizement. 

This makes “wannabes” including authors who have profiteered from both sides – “some bodies”. 

It gives them a chance for a paycheck while allowing them to speculate, guess, and even look inside someone’s trash or someone’s else’s bedroom windows.  This is a dirty business and it takes people that have lowered expectations and sinister thoughts to do it.  Accordingly, many think of them as bottom feeders. 

But just like the proverbial buzzard, there are always parasitic species necessary to deconstruct a corpse. 

In place of a professional relationship at the Bush White House in 2001, we have two groups of feeders within all segments – the insiders who feed morsels in order to control the pigeons, and the “feeders” who are scum sucking at every breath to find a morsel without surrendering their individualism.  But the pigeons have been brought under control and will broadcast far and wide any tidbit that is wanted. 

This is the mechanism – the Rove/Hughes/Bartlett White House operational structure. 

Scott McClellan was a young man with individual dreams.  He found George W. Bush to be open, congenial and supportive.  And he was immediately loyal to him as an individual and a leader. 

Even within the book, his loyalty remains. 

 1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

On File

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments

On File
Bill BurkettOn File

Context from Which to form a credible opinion

Part 1 is intended to provide accurate context both from the perspective of the operational methodology of this White House Administration and a young man, Scott McClellan, who grew up in the job and was far stronger in character than anticipated by his bosses.

 Did he outgrow his bosses, or just beyond their realm of control?

 I do suggest that liberals and progressives continue to make the same old mistake about people like Scott McClellan who after leaving the bubble and implosive vacuum of their position come to a realization that they were wrong.

 Democrats and progressives are again treating McClellan as if he has the plague.  I contend through experience that he instead should be treated as any other American - with respect for his ability to come to a position that we agree with.

 

by Bill Burkett (16 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 22 comments) on Thursday, May 29, 2008 at 4:48:53 PM
 

 

1 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Children dying in Haiti, victims of food crisis exacerbated by four devastating tropical storms Posted by Stephen Fox

Keith Olbermann Broke Up With Me! by Shannyn Moore

Study Confirms Genetically Modified Crops Threaten Human Fertility and Health Safety Posted by sadelaine

Surviving an Economic Crash: Resources and Tips by Kathryn Smith

Home Depot Founder: Retailers Who Don't Support GOP "Should Be Shot" Posted by Joan Brunwasser

Congress Opposes Bush Pardons by David Swanson

The cholesterol - heart disease scam: How the medical-industrial complex is raking in billions at our expense by Richard Clark

A Turkey By Any Other Name--Is Still the Governor of Alaska by Brasch

Fate of Lakotahs Highlights America's Failed Native American Policies by Stephen Lendman

Obama may choose Monsanto's GE-nightmare over an organic human vision by Linn Cohen-Cole

Go To Top 50 Most Popular