Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 11 (11 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   46 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 3 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 13   Well Said 10   Supported 8  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to None 5/8/09

In those same pages Jones also puts to rest Greening’s hope – echoing both FEMA and NIST reports on 911 -- that the orange molten metal pouring from the 81st floor of the South Tower might be the melted aluminum from the airliner rather than molten iron from the thermite reaction.   This complex rebuttal should be read in Jones's original paper.

Greening’s “witches brew” production of thermite is a non-starter for other obvious reasons.  As noted, two of the red/gray chip samples generated more energy per gram than the theoretical limit for conventional thermite, and did so from the red layer alone.  Further details of Greening’s fascinating speculation need not concern us for another very simple reason:  the red/gray chips are patently cutting-edge manufactured materials.   Random blends of building materials cannot form uniform chips of red/gray layers with precisely identical composition.  Red layers for each of the four samples had XEDS spectra that were identical to each other and contained the ingredients of thermite; so were the XEDS spectra of each of the gray layers identical to each other, and were inert materials.  Such identical composition is not consistent with a variety of random mixtures scattered to the winds by the buildings' collapses.

Direct inspection of the red/gray chips, as well as their microstructure, reveals a solid compact gray layer to which the highly granular thermitic red layer adheres.  A nanometer is one billionth of a meter, about 4 hundred millionths of an inch (1 nanometer = 3.93700787 × 10-8 inch).  Magnification of the red layer reveals highly engineered plate-like aluminum particles 40 nm in thickness (40 billionths of a meters) mixed in a solidified matrix with remarkably uniform iron-rich rhomboid particles.  (The aluminum particle in the image below looks like a flying saucer.)  The highly uniform nano-metric particle sizes are found in engineered explosives, but not in normal building materials.   The dense uniform mixture of nano-sized particles is what allows the product to ignite below the temperature of even commercial nano-thermite, and to generate the intense energy output per gram that exceeds the theoretical limits for optimally prepared conventional thermite.





The pictures, especially combined with the nano-thermite performance of the red/gray chips, should persuade any reasonable reader that chips present in all the dust samples are manufactured and engineered.  Thus, I suggest that the only witches brew you need to be aware of is the calculated disinformation that replaces the evidence and its face value with a supposedly "conceivable" interpretation of a portion of the evidence -- that must also blind you to much of the actual evidence -- in order to maintain your devotion to a fictitious Official Story of 911.

                    Why The Dust Matters

I will be brief here from necessity.  If the Towers and Building 7 were destroyed by controlled demolition, then these vastly complicated acts were coordinated through the security apparatus of the World Trade Center in conjunction with high-ranking members of the U.S. military, especially the Air Force, whose cooperation was required to assure that the commercial airplanes hit their targets, and with the media whose job it was to disseminate the fiction of Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda from the mouths of the intelligence agencies that coordinated this grand act of political theater.  The cover-up was managed by control of the crime scene and subsequent "investigations", destruction of the evidence, and was anticipated through a variety of legislation and executive orders that are well known to 911 researchers.  The USG, in cooperation with elements of private industry and finance capital, brought us 911.  The 911 Commission, like the Warren Commission before it, remains a cruel hoax to euthanize critical public thinking.  Not all of the actors who served the cover-up were aware of their roles, but they were ultimately set into motion by those who were.

Behind, and parallel to, the visible and overt political power structure lies the fundamental source of political power and action in the United States.  It is known well only to those who participate regularly in it, and to a small number of persons, who for one reason or another have stumbled into it, have refused to look aside, and have pursued it to its bottom.  I don't wish to dramatize the "invisible government" but these are the persons who control domestic covert action to effect profound changes in political power and political climate in extra-legal ways and who also own and control much of Congress.  The motivation and sense of entitlement to do so is an old story, and keeping within the bounds of U.S. history there is John Jay, who would become the first Chief Justice of the United States, who said in arguing against popular suffrage, ''The people who own the country ought to govern it.''  Covert action is one amongst many means that allow those who own this country to rule it without ostensibly violating the spirit of democracy.

These persons are united in keeping their deeds secret from the vast number of Americans even when they strongly disagree amongst themselves about the wisdom of a particular covert action like 911.  Providing the details for this political perspective would take us too far afield, but it is this perspective that is entailed by the thermitic dust in the World Trade Center, one that would mobilize the American people could they only grasp it and comes to terms with it.  That is what people like Steven Jones, Niels Harrit, Jim Hoffman, Kevin Ryan, David Ray Griffin, Richard Gage & friends are trying to promulgate, and people like Dr. Moffett are trying to suppress.   

The "Thermitic Dust" paper is a scientific paper produced by scientists using their expertise to illuminate the mechanism of 911 as a covert operation.  It presents an extraordinary piece of 911 evidence that allows no wiggle room, that cannot be explained away in any other fashion.  Underscoring the evidentiary significance of the thermitic dust does nothing to scant the larger geopolitical picture nor the abundance of non-scientific evidence that others have laboriously, and often very courageously, assembled.  As Michael Ruppert emphasized, the world is running out of irreplaceable oil.  Others have noted that United States capitalism has been in a long arc of decline since the Vietnam war, and has declined more rapidly in the wake of decisions to deindustrialize and to allow "finance capital" --  parasitic practices that produce fictitious profits at the expense of the real economy -- to become an ever greater part of the U.S. economy.

The ruling class of the United States responded to threats to the U.S. dollar and U.S. global hegemony by generating a pretext for war in the Middle East in an attempt to shore up both the dollar and the hegemony by obtaining a stranglehold on the oil in that area that constitutes roughly 60% of the world's known reserves.  To the rulers of the United States, the sacrifice of 3,000 civilians means nothing more than a form of involuntary conscription that they feel fully entitled to impose.  The "endless war on terror" was a pronouncement by the neocons and their allies of their confidence that military might sufficed to intervene against "terrorism" wherever they felt seizure of scarce resources and geopolitical gain were to be found.  The need to defend ourselves against an existential enemy of the rulers' own creation served as the pretext to build a domestic police state for use against its own citizens should they mobilize against the rulers' preferred allocation of resources when oil and other scarcities could no longer be profitably found to preserve the standard of living to which the people of the United States, and the advanced western democracies generally, had become accustomed.

The importance of the thermitic dust is complementary to all the other evidence assembled by others.  A short non-exhaustive list of such evidence includes 1) the world-wide insider puts that used foreknowledge of 911 to make investments to rake in small fortunes; 2) the many ignored and suppressed warnings derailed from the top of the USG intelligence chain of command; 3) the well-planned and well-concealed War Games running simultaneously with the 911 operation to prevent NORAD from intercepting the airliners and -- only if necessary -- to provide an excuse why no interception occurred; 4) Dick Cheney's "the order still stands" command not to shoot down the airliner that was approaching the Pentagon, that was suppressed by the 911 Commission; 5) the stories of the brave whistleblowers, including Coleen Rowley, Indira Singh, Robert Wright, and Sibel Edmonds all of whom have been sidelined and marginalized into political insignificance; 6) the background of Mohammed Atta & friends (from Daniel Hopsicker) that reveals them as well trained and protected USG intelligence operatives, not Islamic terrorists; 7) the cover-up conspiracy too vast even to adumbrate.

I should say in closing that many if not most of even the very good 911 researchers do not understand the nature of this power nor the forces of psychological resistance to reaching an understanding of it.  For example, David Ray Griffin has urged Congress to investigate 911 anew in light of this dramatic evidence, in my view apparently having failed to learn the palpable lesson from his own book, The 911 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, i.e., that key members Congress were actively complicit in the cover-up and that the others knew their proper role to be to stand aside in mute silence.   Similarly, in his Danish TV interview, Niels Harrit said that now that this paper has revealed not merely the smoking gun, but the "loaded gun," i.e., the unignited thermite, that he expects the authorities to start an investigation and bring the criminals to justice.    

I have no such expectations.  Between the hard facts of the matter and organized political actions stand both the self-deceived guardians of the psychological status quo and the deliberate agents of the invisible government.  Would that the truth were simple, plain, and self-evident.  Instead, we face the problem articulated by my friend Vincent Salandria, the father of the first generation of the John F. Kennedy researchers, in a 1971 address.  Referring to the JFK assassination, Salandria argued that when a major covert action takes place, the truth about it is revealed: 

...at differing levels of certainty to diverse people and at different times. In this way, they [the plotters] could avert a concerted counter thrust to their illegitimate seizure of power. Democratic forces could not unite against the new illegitimate governmental apparatus because of timing. The insights of what had occurred dawned in the minds of the decent citizens at different times and with different degrees of clarity.   (Vincent Salandria, False Mystery, p. 103) 

Salandria believes that often in the Kennedy case, "The new rulers carefully and selectively orchestrated revelations of their bloody work, so as to gain therefrom the deference to which they felt they were entitled by their ascendancy to absolute power."  For 911, a possible example of an orchestrated revelation would be the NASA thermal survey showing ground temperatures days and weeks after 911 that were inconsistent with a normal hydrocarbon fire, boasting of their sins rather than confessing them.  I don't waste much time wondering whether there was such intent behind the NASA survey, or whether the bureaucracy unwittingly produced this early revelatory finding.  The NASA survey failed to produce a collective epiphany because of how slowly information spreads, how ill-equipped most people are to use it, and because even those best equipped to understand it also know the vagaries of research and look for further evidence to confirm or disconfirm it, as have the authors of "Active Thermitic Material."  Sly boast or bureacratic release, the effect is the same. 

Only now, the facts that matter politically are in, and if I expect the mainstream media to do everything in its power to ignore and distort the findings of unignited thermitic material in the WTC dust – and I do – I was still a little surprised to find the Managing Editor of OPEDNEWS doing the same thing.  Perhaps I should not have been. 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

I am a retired forensic psychologist living in Los Angeles with enough time on my hands to have spent the past few years studying the deeds whose perpetrators pejoratively deride the correct analysis of which as (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters

The CIA and US Media Roles in Destabilizing Iran

Attorney Richard Fine's Self-Inflicted Wounds

FBI Frame-up of Bruce E. Ivins Made Simple

911 Plotters Bury the Evidence of Anthrax as their Follow-up Punch

"The propaganda war against Iran" by Bill Van Auken; submitted

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
23 people are discussing this page, with 46 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

that there ought to have been a lot of aluminum ox... by Peter Duveen on Monday, Apr 20, 2009 at 9:03:58 PM
Peter, you are absolutely correct, and this was so... by Michael Green on Monday, Apr 20, 2009 at 9:39:37 PM
First, your proposition that the steel would need ... by Jeffrey Rock on Monday, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:13:57 PM
Sounds like you didn't even look at the essay, whi... by Victoria Ashley on Tuesday, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:01:33 AM
Oh dear, here we go again on the Muddle-Go-Round. ... by Andrew Johnson on Tuesday, Apr 21, 2009 at 3:39:37 AM
The flavour of thermite I prefer is the self-mixin... by gravity32 on Tuesday, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:54:10 AM
Of course I read it. What good does a photo do if ... by Jeffrey Rock on Tuesday, Apr 21, 2009 at 8:25:36 AM
You declare that there needs to be "an inviol... by Gregg Roberts on Tuesday, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:31:03 AM
What do you think brought down WTC #7? And how do ... by Nick van Nes on Monday, May 4, 2009 at 10:11:13 PM
Green did not assert that the steel had to melt. C... by Gregg Roberts on Tuesday, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:05:36 AM
...for a moment that there is both the presence of... by Jeffrey Rock on Tuesday, Apr 21, 2009 at 3:22:36 PM
Whatever state steel gets into at 850 (Fahrenheit,... by Maxwell on Wednesday, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:37:28 PM
Michael Green has given an excellent sum... by David Griscom on Tuesday, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:24:37 PM
Is it still your "theory" that the passengers on t... by Patrick Curley on Sunday, May 3, 2009 at 9:56:52 AM
I thought there were "tons of evidence" ... by Perry Logan on Tuesday, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:27:22 PM
have debunked you, Perry, before you even began.... by richard on Tuesday, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:23:23 PM
But don't feel bad, neither do a lot of scienc... by David Griscom on Wednesday, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:16:32 AM
...not Richard, who's got it right. Thanks, R... by David Griscom on Wednesday, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:23:19 AM
If you can't find the slide show, you may have... by David Griscom on Wednesday, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:30:11 AM
"It's too technical for me."--Logan Then how do... by William Whitten on Wednesday, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:27:46 PM
And -- Where is Dr. Moffet's response to THIS ... by boomerang on Tuesday, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:31:41 PM
this is a colleague's commendable and rather c... by richard on Tuesday, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:28:48 PM
I apologize for the 'bold' type... I swear this ed... by richard on Tuesday, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:31:49 PM
but not much, LOL. Us Macsters have a rocky ro... by Meryl Ann Butler on Wednesday, Apr 22, 2009 at 9:26:36 AM
Thank you very much for this comprehensive and wel... by William Whitten on Wednesday, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:19:57 PM
I'm not smart enough to know where to come dow... by Scott Baker on Wednesday, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:20:39 PM
It is not difficult to understand that nano partic... by Chris Sarns on Wednesday, Apr 22, 2009 at 5:46:28 PM
Noise and fury? Isn't that what the other side bri... by Gregg Roberts on Wednesday, Apr 22, 2009 at 9:18:51 PM
For people like Scott Baker, Perry Logan, Jeff Roc... by gravity32 on Wednesday, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:25:02 PM
I saw a report on TV (that is pretty scientific is... by Mad Jayhawk on Wednesday, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:33:07 PM
The pseudo-scientific rebuttals have been laid bar... by Chris Sarns on Thursday, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:43:45 AM
using bold type, Madjayhawks' argument gain credib... by richard on Thursday, Apr 23, 2009 at 7:44:47 AM
I take back the comment about bold type. Seeing th... by richard on Thursday, Apr 23, 2009 at 7:48:17 AM
This has something to do with how your machine is ... by William Whitten on Monday, May 4, 2009 at 8:44:18 PM
This has something to do with how your machine is ... by William Whitten on Monday, May 4, 2009 at 8:54:02 PM
The planes were, by design, fully loaded with fuel... by William Whitten on Thursday, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:25:19 PM
One basic flaw in the arguments that one floor col... by Maxwell on Thursday, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:55:24 PM
I don't usually touch on the anti-Truthers, (by de... by meremark on Monday, May 4, 2009 at 1:08:15 PM
What? You have some problems with entorpy and mome... by William Whitten on Monday, May 4, 2009 at 9:02:11 PM
at http://911research.wtc7.net. It is a HUGE websi... by Gregg Roberts on Thursday, Apr 23, 2009 at 8:34:14 AM
It is unfortunate that Dr Moffet offered only Judy... by Russ Hallberg on Monday, May 4, 2009 at 12:43:53 AM
If you have access to any of Dr. Moffett's pub... by Richard Volaar on Monday, May 4, 2009 at 6:40:00 AM
Professor at the Department of Chemistry, Universi... by richard on Monday, May 4, 2009 at 8:50:44 AM
If the results in the paper by Dr. Harrit et al., ... by Mike Zelinski on Monday, May 4, 2009 at 4:47:54 PM
I can think of why folks would attempt to thwart r... by richard on Monday, May 4, 2009 at 5:43:59 PM
several weeks ago and being suitably impressed wit... by Nick van Nes on Monday, May 4, 2009 at 9:27:18 PM

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2014, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum