59 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 88 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

No Surprises Yet from Wall Street's President

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   4 comments
Message Mark Crispin Miller
And Wall Street was among his biggest backers. From the "Securities and Investment" companies, Obama got $12.6 million, while McCain got $7.9 million:

http://www.worldrecordsacademy.org/society/most_expensive_presidential_campaign-US_Election_sets_world_record_80426.htm

                               
                                  3.


With Wall Street thus supporting him, moreover, Obama reaped not just those millions but--no less important--the warm affections of the corporate media, which never would have treated him so nicely if their parent companies were not entirely confident that he would serve their interests.

For a good counter-example, recall the media's hostile treatment of John Edwards, whose anti-business stance scared the bejeezus out of the plutocracy--as Reuters reported in an article ("U.S. corporate elites fear candidate Edwards") that ran nowhere in this country when it came out in January of 2008:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/feedarticle?id=7217369

"Open attacks on the business elite are seldom heard from mainstream White House candidates in America, despite skyrocketing CEO pay, rising income inequality, and a torrent of scandals in corporate boardrooms and on Wall Street," wrote reporter Kevin Drawbaugh, who quoted several business lobbyists describing Edwards's run in catastrophic terms. "He has gone to
this angry populist, anti-business rhetoric that borders on class warfare," said one. An Edwards presidency, said another, would be "'a disaster' for his well-heeled industrialist clients."

That sentiment throughout the boardrooms and penthouses had already skewed the media's coverage of Edwards's campaign, which was not so much reported as attacked, with story after story on his haircut and his mansion and his lecture fees, etc. All of this was meant to cast his economic program as a sham, because of his own wealth (as if, say, FDR had lived like a sharecropper). The media's anti-Edwards drive was so pronounced that several sharp observers, including Jeff Cohen and Greg Sargent, wrote about it:

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/05/31/1570/

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/horsesmouth/2007/10/ny_times_we_onl.php

So ferocious was the press's animus that they continued bashing Edwards long after he had quit the race. Of course, they went ballistic on his extra-marital affair--while staying absolutely mute on Sarah Palin's, although she was running and he wasn't, and even though she postured as a paragon of "family values" (and he hadn't). The double standard was especially egregious, since both those scandals had been broken by the National
Enquirer, and yet that tabloid was somehow illegitimate in Palin's case alone.

Clearly, that belated shower of mud was meant to finish Edwards off politically, so that he might not ever rise again. Thus he was destroyed for threatening the Big Money-- much as Eliot Spitzer too was taken down for having (prematurely) spoken out against the crimes of Wall Street and their likely consequences. There as well the media did its usual plutocratic job, by simply piling on, refraining pointedly from raising any questions as to
why the government was nailing Spitzer for so slight a crime, and why he must resign, while Sen. David Vitter, who had also played around with hookers, stayed in office. That sinner could stay on the job because he was a Bush Republican (just like Sen. Larry Craig), while those rogue Democrats were driven out, perhaps for good.


                                  4.


Obama, on the other hand, is no rogue Democrat, but the accommodating type, who wouldn't be where he is now if Wall Street and its huge affiliates had not blessed his campaign; and so he's pushing forward with his bank plan, strangely deaf to all the thunder that may bring the house down yet, if and when things don't turn out the way he's hoping that they will.

And with that growing thunder there is nothing wrong: on the contrary. Wall Street's apologists throughout the media have been haughtily deploring all this public wrath, because they fear us more than anything--which is surely why they backed Obama, figuring that he would not just safeguard their own interests but also keep us quiet, with his hypnotic oratory and amazing air of calm.

But it's not working; and it shouldn't work. We have to speak out forcefully against the mammoth crap-shoot that Obama and his men are playing with our money, and our future. Otherwise we'll all go down, because this country's rotten politics is killing us, even with Barack Obama, not his heinous predecessor, at the helm. So let's all face the fact that things are likely not to "change" at all, unless we force him to it.

MCM

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Mark Crispin Miller Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Mark's new book, Loser Take All: Election Fraud and the Subversion of Democracy, 2000-2008, a collection 14 essays on Bush/Cheney's election fraud since (and including) 2000, is just out, from Ig Publishing. He is also the author of Fooled Again: The Real Case for Electoral Reform, which is now out in paperback (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

This bill will kill small farms, and wreck our food supply

Scott Walker Goes To Chicago, Gets His Mic Checked! (Must-See)

Notorious Saudi prince is Fox News Corp's 4th-largest voting shareholder

Was Prop 8 Actually Defeated??

Peter B. Collins going off the air

Obama won by MILLIONS MORE than we've been told

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend