Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 31 (31 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   6 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

McCain and Republican Lies about Acorn are attempts to hide GOP Election Fraud

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Steven Leser     Permalink
      (Page 3 of 4 pages) Become a premium member to see this article as one long page.
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Valuable 3   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 10/19/08

Author 75
Become a Fan
  (9 fans)
- Advertisement -

Another area of concern as a vulnerability for GOP election fraud is described by Bev Harris, one of the people who got involved with examining the voting process for the last eight years. She has been examining the role of middlemen and the 2008 election and has some concerns that she reports here:
 http://www.opednews.com/articles/New-results-middleman-spot-by-Bev-Harris-081016-741.html and here http://www.opednews.com/articles/2008-election-results-to-b-by-Bev-Harris-080929-93.html . As Bev so aptly puts it:

WHAT'S A MIDDLEMAN AND WHY THE CONCERN?

A middleman entity is an entity that sits in between the votes first counted and the results finally reported. Visualize it this way: If you hand count votes at a polling place, then give the results sheet to a courier, who then drives the results and ballots somewhere else before publicly reporting them, that courier is inserted between the original results and the reported results. Middlemen are in a position to see the results before they are officially reported, and may be in a position to alter results before they are officially reported.

Another example of a middleman is the central tabulator computer, which aggregates results. Whoever operates that computer is in a position for "first look" and alteration. Another middleman is the company that provides the server which hosts the results when they are posted publicly. As results stream into the server, the owner of the server can get access to the results for first look or alteration.

.
.
.

DO MIDDLEMEN MEAN THE ELECTION WILL BE COMPROMISED?

No. They are in a position to cheat, and they are privatized so it is not possible to learn much about what they do. It is important to know who they are.

For example, the Smartech firm that served as a results middleman for Ohio is extremely partisan and a highly inappropriate choice. The LEDS LLC middleman is involved in an ethics scandal in Colorado right now. The GBS/Fidlar middleman in Illinois is also highly partisan.

- Advertisement -

I have not yet looked up more information on SOE Software, but have pulled its corporate documents from the State of Florida. It's officers include:

BENNETT, BRUCE
SCHNEIDER, MARK A
MARC, FRATELLO J
MICHAEL, HATCH L
CHRIS, PEIFER

Because it has access to sensitive information and acts as an election results middleman it will be a good idea to learn more about this firm.

SOE Software, owns ClarityElections.com, which acts as an election results middleman, as you can see here:

http://www.soesoftware.com/connect-enr.html

- Advertisement -

----------------------------------

This Middleman issue reminds me that in elections there is a strong public perception bias in favor of the person who is initially termed the winner. We saw this in election 2000 with the public sentiment turning against Gore once Katherine Harris certified the results. It doesn't matter what fraud occurred to produce the initial result, the person on the wrong side of that result faces a difficult and uphill battle fighting to get the issues examined, let alone corrected. The way this relates to the 'middleman' issue is that it is easy to foresee in a close election that a Middleman could alter the results of one or more counties that would result in an initial declaration or certification for the wrong candidate. Getting that result changed would involve the apparent 'loser' fighting against public opinion as they tried to correct the results. A recount would probably uncover the erroneous results sent in by a middleman, but would the public sit still long enough to let that process play itself out before demanding the person initially termed the 'loser' concede?

Are Electronic Voting Machines the Cure alls we have been promised?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 3   Valuable 3   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

http://www.ibtimes.com/blog/steven-leser_103/bio/
A political blogger for the International Business Times, Steve Leser is a hot national political pundit. He has appeared on MSNBC's Coundown with Keith Olbermann, Comedy Central's Daily Show with Jon Stewart and Russia Today's (RT) Crosstalk with (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

McCain Campaign Violated McCain-Feingold law with Palin Clothing Purchases

McCain attacked 18 year old Chelsea Clinton in 1998 now says Palin's family & kids are off limits

McCain says "Horseshit" on National TV During Debate

North Korea – Impending Missile Launch May Require US Military Action

Palin: Drill Baby Drill, but blame Obama for the Spill!

Palin to McCain - Oops I did it Again