Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 7 (10 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   10 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Correspondence and collusion between the New York Times and the CIA

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 3 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 6   Well Said 4   Supported 4  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 8/30/12

Become a Fan
  (111 fans)

It is true that Mazzetti's emails with the CIA do not shock or surprise in the slightest. But that's the point. With some noble journalistic exceptions (at the NYT and elsewhere), these emails reflect the standard full-scale cooperation -- a virtual merger -- between our the government and the establishment media outlets that claim to act as "watchdogs" over them.

From "All the news that's fit to print" to "please delete after you read" and cannot "go into detail because it is an intelligence matter": that's the gap between the New York Times' marketed brand and its reality.

* * * * *

UPDATE: The Times' Public Editor weighed in on this matter today, noting his clear disapproval for what Mazzetti did: 

"Whatever Mr. Mazzetti's motivation, it is a clear boundary violation to disclose a potentially sensitive article pre-publication under such circumstances. This goes well beyond the normal give-and-take that characterizes the handling of sources and suggests the absence of an arm's-length relationship between a reporter and those he is dealing with."

While Mazzetti himself expresses regret for his behavior -- "It was definitely a mistake to do. I have never done it before and I will never do it again" -- both he and Executive Editor Jill Abramson insist that he had no bad intent, but was simply trying to help out a colleague (Dowd) by having her claims fact-checked. Like Baquet, Abramson invokes secrecy to conceal the key facts: "I can't provide further detail on why the entire column was sent."

The question raised by these excuses is obvious: if Mazzetti were acting with such pure and benign motives, why did he ask the CIA to delete the email he sent? This appears to be a classic case of expressing sorrow not over what one did, but over having been caught.

On a different note, Politico's Byers, in response to my inquiry, advises me that Baquet did indeed say what Byers attributed to him -- "he could not go into detail on the issue because it was an intelligence matter" -- and that his exact quote was: it "has to with intel."

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

For the past 10 years, I was a litigator in NYC specializing in First Amendment challenges, civil rights cases, and corporate and securities fraud matters. I am the author of the New York Times Best-Selling book, How Would A Patriot (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

HSBC, too big to jail, is the new poster child for US two-tiered justice system

US investigates possible WikiLeaks leaker for "communicating with the enemy"

Prosecution of Anonymous activists highlights war for Internet control

The myth of Obama's "blunders" and "weakness"

Are All Telephone Calls Recorded And Accessible To The US Government?

The Remarkable, Unfathomable Ignorance of Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The sorry fact is that this cozy behavior shows th... by Paul Repstock on Thursday, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:00:03 PM
are becoming inured to so many lethal wrongs these... by j dial on Thursday, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:54:47 PM
" media figures come to identify so closely with... by Josh Mitteldorf on Friday, Aug 31, 2012 at 6:43:59 AM
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of ... by Truth Will Prevail on Friday, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:24:47 AM
just a few short years ago. I'm still reeling over... by Daniel Geery on Friday, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:39:18 AM
According to Dr. Manning, Obama (born in 1961) en... by Deborah Dills on Friday, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:05:49 PM
The CIA, as well as the FBI, has access to all the... by Marika on Friday, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:09:23 AM
While I am not a Ron Paul supporter, much of what ... by Deborah Dills on Friday, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:23:17 AM
JFK wanted to abolish the CIA and looks like they ... by Anuel Jackson on Friday, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:46:40 PM
Yes, and JFK also tried to rid us of the Federal R... by Deborah Dills on Friday, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:47:40 PM