Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 3   Must Read 2   Well Said 2   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 7/15/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (14 comments)

Cheney Sweats Out the Summer

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (87 fans)   -- Page 3 of 4 page(s)

opednews.com

Our unprecedented appeal even caught the eye of the FCM, since our Memorandum for the President reviewed some of the deceit engineered by the Vice President in conjuring up a concocted rationale for war on Iraq and leading the cheerleading for it.

We noted that Cheney, skilled at preemption, had stolen a march on his vacationing colleagues by launching, in a major speech on Aug. 26, 2002, a meretricious campaign to persuade Congress and the American people that Iraq was about to acquire nuclear weapons.

That campaign mushroomed, literally, in early October, with Bush and senior advisers raising the specter of a "mushroom cloud" threatening our cities. On the inside of the synthetic clouds one could almost read the label - "manufactured out of thin air in the Office of the Vice President."

In his memoir, the pitiable former CIA Director George Tenet complains that Cheney's assertion that Iraq would acquire nuclear weapons "fairly soon" did not square with the intelligence community's assessment.

Tenet adds, "I was surprised when I read about Cheney's assertion that, 'Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction.'"

Tenet whines that the Vice President did not send him a copy of the speech for clearance. But the malleable CIA director quickly got over it, and told CIA analysts to compose the kind of National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) that would provide ex post facto support for Cheney's bogus assertions. Just what Cheney (and Bush) ordered.

Tenet explains lamely, "I should have told the Vice President privately that, in my view, his speech had gone too far ... and not let silence imply agreement."

Yes, George; and you should have resisted White House pressure for a dishonest NIE to grease the skids to unnecessary war.

In fact Cheney, as well as Tenet, knew very well that Cheney's assertions were lies.

How? Saddam's son-in-law, Hussein Kamel, whom Saddam had put in charge of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons, as well as missile development, told the United States when he defected in mid-1995 that all (that's right, all) such weapons had been destroyed at his order by the summer of 1991.

In mid-2002, the Iraqi foreign minister, whom CIA operatives had recruited and persuaded to remain in place, was telling us the same thing.

Unwelcome Intelligence

When they briefed the President and his senior advisers on this, CIA operations officers were astonished to learn first-hand that this intelligence was unwelcome.

These officers, who had used every trick in the book to "turn" the foreign minister and get him working for us, were told that further reporting from this source was not needed: "This isn't about intel anymore. This is about regime change," they were told.

Tenet was hardly astonished at reports of the non-existence of WMD. From documentary evidence in the Downing Street Minutes we know that Tenet on July 20, 2002, told the chief of British intelligence that the intelligence was being "fixed" around the policy.

And former UN inspectors like Scott Ritter could verify that some 90 percent of the WMD Iraq earlier possessed had been destroyed - some during the Gulf War in 1991, but most as a result of the inspections conducted by the UN.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, the publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in inner-city Washington. He was an Army infantry/intelligence officer and then a CIA analyst for 27 years, and is now on the Steering Group of (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
14 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Totally False Pretenses For War by Lance Ciepiela on Tuesday, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:29:31 PM
False Flag? by foxii on Wednesday, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:35:36 PM
Reading this by Nick van Nes on Wednesday, Jul 15, 2009 at 8:14:49 AM
Who? by MR. blue sky on Wednesday, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:49:29 PM
Very good question by Nick van Nes on Wednesday, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:56:32 PM
NICK by WML on Wednesday, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:23:11 PM
You bring up a good point by Nick van Nes on Thursday, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:39:46 AM
After all this time, 1 question: Why not impeach? by Margaret Bassett on Wednesday, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:15:06 AM
Cheney On The Firing Line...Execution-style! by Dak on Wednesday, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:34:08 AM
McGovern for National Security Advisor! by Guitar Chris on Wednesday, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:58:58 AM
I WAS THERE, WHERE WERE YOU? by mollycruz on Wednesday, Jul 15, 2009 at 1:09:46 PM
Thank you for your informative and insightful article. by Nathan Nahm on Wednesday, Jul 15, 2009 at 2:47:31 PM
YES, THE BUSH/CHENEY CRIMES... by Professor Fandel on Thursday, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:04:32 AM
Keep it up, Ray - by Plenum on Thursday, Jul 16, 2009 at 7:21:41 AM