Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   5 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Canada's Shadow Revenue Minister Warns Government against Sellout on FATCA!

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 3 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 2   Must Read 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Currently, Canada is engaged in closed door negotiations with the U.S. over an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) for the implementation of FATCA in Canada. Such an agreement could oblige Canada to enact laws and regulations requiring Canadian financial institutions to comply with this U.S.-based legislation. New Democrats have serious concerns about the lack of transparency and consultation during these negotiations and the potential for such an agreement to infringe on the rights of Canadians and fail to offer reciprocal benefits to both parties.

Reports suggest that if implemented, an IGA may require Canadian banks, investment funds and other financial institutions to disclose annually to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) information on accounts held by American citizens, including dual citizens in Canada. Failure to disclose account information could result in a withholding tax applied to U.S. income earned by the institution or by the account holder. We are concerned that these negotiations may allow the United States to bypass the established exchange of information between the IRS and the Canada Revenue Agency and instead get information directly from Canadian financial institutions. Concerns have been raised that such a system could potentially violate existing Canadian privacy laws. Furthermore, at this time it is unclear if reciprocal information would be granted in return.

New Democrats are concerned with the prospect of a foreign nation unilaterally imposing obligations on Canadian banks to disclose personal information. The Canadian Government has a responsibility to protect Canada's tax base, and while we understand the United States' desire to protect their own tax base, this should not come at the cost of the rights of individuals residing in our own country. Cracking down on tax cheats should occur through international cooperation rather than unilateral action.

What's more, the secrecy of the negotiations over this agreement has left Canadians in the dark as to the integrity of their personal banking information. The Canadian government should be standing up for the civil liberties of Canadians. Furthermore, the Conservative government must ensure that any agreement reached is fair for Canada.

In the interest of transparency, fair taxation and respect for privacy rights, we are asking the government to reject any agreement that violates the rights Canadians or that fails to offer Canada equal benefits to those provided to the United States.

In light of the important issues at stake, we urge the government to bring transparency to this process and inform Parliamentarians on the state of negotiations.

I appreciate your time and look forward to your response.


Murray Rankin, Member of Parliament for Victoria

Official Opposition Critic for National Revenue

cc: Peggy Nash, Official Opposition Critic for Finance

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

Managing Director, Global Strategic Communications Group; government and media relations specialist. Former US diplomat, US Senate staffer. JD Georgetown 1978, BA Penn State 1974.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

News from Switzerland: A Referendum To Overturn FATCA Breaks through Fears of U.S. Retaliation

Canada's Shadow Revenue Minister Warns Government against Sellout on FATCA!

FATCA: a Tool of the Electronic Surveillance State

Canadians Confront the Banks and the Yanks: Open Letter Urges President of Canadian Bankers Association to Oppose FATCA Files Freedom of Information Act Request on "Intergovernmental Agreements' with Canada, Switzerland, and


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

as I have for 39 years. Mr Jatras points out a pro... by B. Ross Ashley on Saturday, Oct 5, 2013 at 11:18:58 AM
From the web site:FATCA (the "Fore... by Doc McCoy on Sunday, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:52:32 AM
Canada has to stand firm against blackmail and int... by Archie on Sunday, Oct 6, 2013 at 12:59:04 PM
If Canada were to accept FATCA, it would essential... by Doc McCoy on Sunday, Oct 6, 2013 at 5:36:05 PM
Thanks to those who commented.  Yes, FATCA is... by James Jatras on Monday, Oct 7, 2013 at 1:25:31 PM