Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (3 comments)

California Supremes to Hear Challenges to Prop. 8

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 3 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

What they didn’t count on was Barack Obama being elected president. Unlike John McCain, who would have turned the Supreme Court solidly conservative, Obama will have the opportunity to change the neconistic face of the court into a progressive, civil rights upholding, constitutional rights guaranteeing court.

The anti-same sex marriage people will soon find that the champagne they drank in celebration will turn to sour grapes in their bigoted stomachs.

They had to know that law suits fighting the passage of all these propositions were drawn up long before the first vote was cast, proof of which was the filing of three law suits the day after the election.

Law suits, peaceful demonstrations in cities across the country by gay activists is just the beginning of a long, hard fight.

Those opposed to same-sex marriage will find that the gay community, which is organizing itself en masse will be formidable opponents.

This must and will work its way up through the court system, beginning with challenges to California’s initiative process itself.

Changing California’s Constitution

Ballot initiatives are meant to tweak existing law, not change the state’s constitution.

To change the Constitution requires a two-thirds vote by both state houses, followed by a two-thirds vote of the people.

Before they are done, those against same-sex marriage better find themselves even more money and some very good lawyers to make their specious arguments before the United States Supreme Court.

A perfect example of which, is last week one of the largest anti-everything that isn’t in the Bible according to them groups had to lay off 20 staffers, because they spent $600,000 to tout Prop. 8. Amazingly, $600K is exactly what they pay their staffers, whose efforts added to the success of the ballot measure.

Talk about being ungrateful for what ye reap. Well, very few have ever said they aren’t anything but the biggest of hypocrites.

I believe it was the Family Research Council, but my best Googling couldn’t find the news story, even though it was all over the news last week.

Never being one to buy into the canard of “slippery slope,” I’m changing my mind. Just as smoking bans are constantly being expanded, and have led to going after the fatties and fast food, if the no-to-same-sex-people get their way, it’s a forgone conclusion that ultimately they will go after civil unions.

This is a matter of equal rights under law, and contrary to their claims that if gay couples are allowed to marry, life as we know it will cease to exist.

That won’t happen either. Since gay couples gained the right to marry in California in June, the Earth hasn’t stopped spinning on its axis, nor has the sun ceased to rise in the east.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Sandy Sand began her writing career while raising three children and doing public relations work for Women's American ORT (Organization for Rehabilitation through Training). That led to a job as a reporter for the San Fernando Valley Chronicle, a (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

What Happens In the Bedroom by Deborah Wells on Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:44:00 PM
My Prediction by Paul Kruger on Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:39:21 PM
Interesting Question by Gallaher on Friday, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:55:23 PM