WG: It is about pagan pre-Christian history - our human history for about 3000 years from ancient Babylon and Egypt up until Christianity. Then when Christianity was introduced - made compulsory by Emperor Theodosius in AD 390 - everything pagan was destroyed. All the old records were literally deliberately burned. Temples and monuments were smashed. Our real history was destroyed and replaced by Christian doctrine.
RMT: 3) You talk about 'anomalies' - what does that mean, can you talk about examples?
WG: Yes I mean items or events that are logically inconsistent or inexplicable - at odds with the orthodox paradigm. For example there was an iron plate and a bronze hook found inside the Great Pyramid - that are now in the British Museum. They were from inside the Great Pyramid, meaning at a date that is before the Iron Age and Bronze Age by about 1000-2000 years. And there is no tin in Egypt from which to make bronze.
Another example - in a study run by a Harvard professor, carbon C-14 dating of the mortar of the Great Pyramid shows it dates to about 3000 BC - which is about 400-450 years older than Pharaoh Cheops. Everyone knows that. And parts of the Great Pyramid and adjacent pyramid show saw cuts and drill holes in granite and even basalt - made by diamond tipped instruments. Quite clear and recorded by none other than Professor Flinders Petrie, the father of Egyptology.
And - the Great Pyramid was never a tomb. Again the professional academic Egyptologists know that. They call them 'symbolic' tombs because they know no bodies or mummies or skeletons were ever found in them. Even in several examples of closed sealed chambers - they were all empty.
Recently in 2010 parts of the Great Pyramid have been found to be radioactive - quite strongly radioactive. Back in the 1800s early European explorers recorded that the 'natives' told them the pyramids were dangerous because of invisible evil spirits - which the explorers laughed at as superstitious belief in ghosts. Those are just small examples - which some people dismiss as individual errors. But there are dozens of such cases - so many that when you add them all up the total weight is hard to ignore.
A much more important example is the emergence of the Sumerians in Mesopotamia before about 4000 BC. All the orthodox history says the eastern Mediterranean area was in a completely normal Neolithic state up until about 10,000 BC with just scattered small tribes of primitive hunter-gatherers. Then there was a gap of about 2000 years with no records of activity at all. Then somewhere around 6000-4000 BC the Sumerians and their cousins in Lower Egypt appeared - suddenly out of nowhere. They called themselves 'Sumeru' meaning civilised lords.
Suddenly there were sophisticated people with language and numbers; codified law, brick construction; fine pottery and exquisite jewellery; domesticated animals and agricultural crops. It was magic - material and cultural civilisation just appeared out of nowhere.
And the early records of skeletons showed the newcomers were physically much taller and different from the natives. They were immigrants. All this is on the orthodox record up until about 1950. Clearly the eastern Mediterraneans - from whom we are all descended - did not evolve by gradual Darwinian evolution. They just appeared suddenly.
RMT: 4) When you were writing that the pyramids were essentially nuclear reactors powering huge steam generators, and that the God of the Israelites was the light of these reactors; also that the Israelites had nuclear weapons in the 3000 years preceding the venue of Jesus Christ, how did you think it would be received by all these experts and everyone in general?
WG: At first I thought it was so clear, so obvious, with so much evidence that everyone would just say ...gosh, why didn't we see that before. But later I realised it was so radical that no one would believe it at all and instead think I must be a total fruit-cake.
But it is absolutely clear cut. The original Egyptian texts say the pyramid was a machine that accomplished the transformation of the dead body into the light of the sun. Those are not my words - that is a quote from a Harvard professor. I am not making any of it up, it is in the standard translations of the Egyptian texts.
The evidence that they were nuclear reactors is overwhelming, clear, unambiguous. The Egyptian literature itself is called 'instructions for making a great light'; from 'light food' of saffron [yellow] cake in portions of 2-3-5 [Uranium 235]; and the Great Pyramid is known to be still radioactive. Quite strongly radioactive.
Ironically there was early 'native' literature that said a chamber of the Great Pyramid enclosed the secrets of the disintegration of matter. But that was not in English so it was regarded as unreliable.
RMT: 5) Who are these Lords of Ur from Sumeria (Iraq) who built the pyramids and the megaliths in Europe and are the forefathers of the Israelites? Where did they come from, and how did they have advanced knowledge of chemistry and nuclear technology?
WG: The texts - Babylonian, Egyptian and Hebrew - say they were civilised lords from across the sea. They were tall, long-headed and long-lived [called 'mighty' and 'ancient of days' in Biblical terms].