OpEdNews Op Eds

Another NNC Lendman Interview

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 3 of 5 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (191 fans)

What it plans can't be tolerated. Hopefully it won't be.

Russian and Chinese views on Syria and Iran differ greatly with Western countries. Will either nation or both draw red lines? Will they clearly say full-scale intervention against Syria won't be tolerated? 

Will EU countries support US policies they think reckless? The fullness of time alone will have final say on these and other major issues.

Next year could be defining. At stake is whether things will spin violently out of control, or will moderates prevail. It's unclear what's most likely. At this time, hawks have control. Whether they'll keep it remains to be seen.

NNC: Is there any relationship with new State leadership and placing more importance on East Asian foreign policy?

Months ago Obama announced foreign policy emphasis on two major areas - the Middle East and East Asia. More recently, North Africa came more in focus. 

Obama may ask Congress for war on terror funding against Mali, Nigeria, and Libya. At issue is solidifying control over regional resources. 

Perhaps other regional countries will be targeted. Obama's warmaking appetite is insatiable. It exceeds all his predecessors and then some. 

He's already waging multiple direct and proxy wars. His rhetoric about winding them down rings hollow. He wants to make the most of the next four years. He governs like a serial killer. At State, expect Kerry to offer full support.

NNC: What will be Kerry's dominant approach? Will he prioritize soft or hard policies, or perhaps both?

He'll differ from Clinton only in style. His rhetoric may be less hardline. His approach may be softer. He'll avoid operating like Rice. 

Her abrasive gives diplomacy a bad name. Winning back friends she alienated may be stressed. Her contempt for sound policy needs rectifying. 

Some call her and Clinton war goddesses. They never met conflicts America waged or planned they didn't support. Kerry's much the same. Fundamental policy stays unchanged. Style alone will give false reassurances.

Follow policy measures. Ignore rhetoric. Real time events matter. Language discussing them disguises plans and strategic goals. They reflect America's imperial agenda. 

Kerry won't change it. He'll continue destructive policies. He won't disappoint imperial planners depending on him. Humanity has much to fear.

A Final Comment

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

I was born in 1934, am a retired, progressive small businessman concerned about all the major national and world issues, committed to speak out and write about them.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The McCain-Lieberman Police State Act

Daniel Estulin's "True Story of the Bilderberg Group" and What They May Be Planning Now

Continuity of Government: Coup d'Etat Authority in America

America Facing Depression and Bankruptcy

Lies, Damn Lies and the Murdoch Empire

Mandatory Swine Flu Vaccine Alert

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments