Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Interesting 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 1/10/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (3 comments)

ASCULUM, PART ONE: The Plot Thickens (or Why Am I Not Surprised?)

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 3 of 6 page(s)

opednews.com

He campaigned for Senate with a pro-NAFTA position.
He opposes single payer healthcare and a living wage.
He voted in support of the Patriot Act
and he’ll keep police state laws firmly in place.

He’ll do nothing to protect immigrants’ rights
and continue to undermine labor.
He’ll move toward privatizing education,
and keep Social Security firmly on the table.

He voted to make it harder to file class action suits
and for corporate-friendly tort “reform”,
against a 30% cap on credit card rates
and amnesty for illegally spying telecoms.

He supports the invasive real ID and the death penalty
and he’ll add to the list of crimes that are death-eligible.
He voted for a nuclear energy bill which included cluster bombs,
federal funding for Yucca Mountain and the production of ethanol.

He supported the bailout while rejecting moratoriums
on foreclosures and a freeze on mortgage rates
and wrote Clinton and conservatives were right to destroy welfare,
creating “workfare” to leave capitalism’s victims to their fate.

He led a 25-year reversal of an offshore drilling ban,
and wants to expand nuclear power and “clean” coal plants.
He’s for corporate subsidies, and enlarging the Pentagon’s budget
for U.S. military operations’ expansion.

A worsening financial crisis and a metastasizing budget
will preclude an expansion of social spending,
since Democrats intend to make the Working Class pay
for the breakdown of American capitalism

and the bailout of the financial aristocracy
as Obama makes the “difficult choices”
and industries line up for government handouts
while the people of America get screwed royally.

He embraces the politics of racist icons like Reagan
while claiming racism is not endemic in America
and that Blacks are 90% of the way to equality,
implying we’ll soon hear little about affirmative action.

While he presents a different face to the world,
reviving illusions of our democratic pretensions,
he’ll mute opposition to the plans of the financial elite
by providing the mirage of a hopeful alternative.

As his transition team moves further and further to the right,
we’ll see the true meaning of “change you can believe in”,
as Obama makes social and economic justice roadkill
while he drives America on in stagnant continuity.

This hypocrisy will be explained as pragmatism,
Obama’s “necessary concession to reality”,
but in reality this pragmatism is a euphemism
for the same old neo-conservative ideology.

His Clinton Era leftovers, now corporate lobbyists,
are rushing back to DC in a sickening flash forward
of the Class War’s continuation in America
and the metastasizing of wars of imperial conquest.

As representatives to the G-20 summit he sent
Jim Leach, of the infamous Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
and Madeleine “We think the price was worth it” Albright.
And we’re supposed to cut Obama some slack?!!

He’s not the solution, but the face of the problem,
the perfect symbol of change made on Wall Street
and the Ultra Wealthy’s savviest members
in response to the crisis of their imperial policies.

Corporate capitalists have a knack for selling
seeming rebellion against themselves,
marketing products which allow people to pretend
to transcend the conformity of which these products are an emblem,
and besides, their tired ideology needed to be repackaged,
rebranded and sold as “change you can believe in”.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

 

Vi's works appear widely both in print and online. She conducts Poetry Workshops and gives readings in Central New York. Her latest chapbook is "Sine Qua Non Antiques (an Arcanum of History, Geography and Treachery).

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Much of this article by Nick van Nes on Saturday, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:59:38 PM
I thought this article to be largely speculative... by John Sanchez Jr. on Sunday, Jan 11, 2009 at 8:44:32 AM
It's 'Friendly Fascism', as predicted by Jim Eldon on Sunday, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:04:30 PM