Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...)  (less...)
Add to My Group
October 25, 2008 at 22:35:45

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 10/25/08:

A Way to Restore Confidence in Elections

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Steven Freeman and Joel Bleifuss (about the author)     Page 3 of 4 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

Unfortunately, although exit polls were invented in the United States and are vigorously promoted for elections abroad, here they are nonfunctional as a means of election verification.

 

The 2004 national exit poll was conducted for a consortium of the major news groups (ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, FOX and AP) and was designed to be used by the media in forecasting and commentary -- rather than by citizens for election verification.

 

This was made clear by the pollsters' response to the nationwide 7 percentage point discrepancy between the exit polls and the official count in the 2004 presidential election. In their subsequent report, the Evaluation of Edison/Mitofsky, the pollsters did not include precinct-level data, which the media consortium refused to release. We only know of the discrepancy -- one which represents 9 million votes -- because a technical glitch prevented the pollsters from promptly uploading "corrected" results, that is, results adjusted to conform to the official count.

 

In 2006 and future elections, the exit pollsters have stated that they will not release results even to their media clients until they are "corrected" to conform to the official count. Of course, once data are "corrected," they are no longer true exit poll results; rather, they accord an unwarranted legitimacy upon the official numbers.

 

Unlike exit polls that we are used to seeing on election night, a transparent exit poll would not be designed to predict and analyze election results in a hurry. Instead, this poll could be designed from the ground up to check on the validity of election results.

 

Rigorous statistical design would separate bias in the polling from errors in the count. Such a survey could also resolve specific allegations of fraud in political jurisdictions and with voting technologies known to have a history of irregularities. The entire process -- survey design, raw data and all analysis -- would be open to public scrutiny.

 

Like the rest of the world, Americans deserve to know when voting machines have not yielded accurate counts and when an election may have been tampered with. We deserve elections that are run fairly and that inspire our confidence. Until our state and federal governments provide a voting system that we can trust, a public exit poll -- open and transparent and publicly funded -- would provide our best assurance of fair elections.

 

 

 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

Steven Freeman is a professor at University of Pennsylvania and the co-author of Was The 2004 Presidential Election Stolen? with Joel Bleifuss.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Corporations Voting Machine"
Analysis of error correction by majority voting (Research Report RJ. International Business Machines Corporation. Research Division)
by Nicholas Pippenger


Number of pages: 28
Publisher: IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center

Shouptronic facts for Shelby County, Tennessee
by Robert J Boram


Number of pages:
Publisher: R.F. Shoup Corporation

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Why Barack Obama will be the Next President..by a Landslide by Robert Singer on Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:23:03 PM
why by Angelo on Sunday, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:20:19 PM
Exit Polls are the best way to guard against election fraud, by Mark Adams on Sunday, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:39:45 PM
Conditional love by Alan Williams on Sunday, Oct 26, 2008 at 1:46:37 PM
counting voted by B York on Sunday, Oct 26, 2008 at 2:45:15 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum