Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Group(s): Add to My Group
October 12, 2008 at 22:23:27

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Supported 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 10/12/08:

Capitalism Condemned in Scriptures; Let's Dump It

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Jay Janson (about the author)     Page 3 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

Maybe this month's $700,000,000 tax-payer's rescue of Wall Street tycoons and similar moves around the capitalist governed  world economy will rev-up motor's of indignation and awaken many millions to the amoral nature and immoral consequences of a now defunct overly sly system of capitalism, so out of place in the space age and age of instant communication.

As a kid, in the late 1930s and early 1940s, yours truly learned from overhearing comments and expletives in the street, in stores and even on the radio that a 'capitalist' was a dangerous, despicable, dishonorable, greedy out of control individual bent on deceptively tricking innocent people out of their money, possessions, homes and the fruit of their own labor.

In my high-school history books, the word capitalist never appeared to describe the fabulously wealthy and powerful 'captains of American industry', though the question, "Were they robber barons?" was put forward in college texts for discussion.

It was only when this kid became middle aged, that the term 'capitalism' began to be gingerly referred to by TV commentators and op-ed writers, sanitized, its murderous anti-union history forgiven in obvious propaganda that presumptuously credited most of modern human achievement and progress to 'the capitalism system'.


The wheel has come full circle. Capitalism recently beatified, today, by its own undoing stands before us defrocked, exposed and naked in shame and embarrassing confusion.

Capitalism, by definition marginalizing ethics and social well-being, presents itself as unreformable.

When asked, 'well, what could we replace capitalism with?' Answer, replace it with economics of fairness, honesty, ethical behavior and caring humanism!

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Call for forums on Capitalisn in Media, colleges, schools and places of worship

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Musician and writer, who has lived and worked on all the continents and whose articles on media have been published in China, Italy, England and the US, and now resides in New York City.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 comments

Unfortunately, the Church Loves Money

Many, like me, believe this epoch to be the end times but the organized church has transformed itself into synagogues of satan. Scriptural and spiritual guidance are missing. The church and evangelism are avenues for money-making careers, not labors of love. Prosperity gospels and blessings are usuriously exchanged for that 10 per cent of your income

If you compare -- or better yet record -- their private behavior to that of their public persona, the discrepancy is outright schizophrenic. 

That's why the current batch of church leaders will not, and can not offer a soothing balm to a hurting world. 

by Mathew Maavak (10 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 12 comments [1 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Oct 13, 2008 at 7:06:00 AM

Recommend  (0+)

Misers

The big secret is out. Politicians and the media were hiding the fact that American households have a net worth of over 56 trillion dollars. That is more than half the household wealth of the world. Those statistics come from the Federal reserve Flow of Funds Summary Statistics Second Quarter 2008. If there was a way to get the hoarders of those bucks to go on a long shopping spree the recession in the U.S. would quickly end. But our politicians fear talking to those idle saving account owners and their potential to stimulate our economy, they would rather increase the national debt than anger millions of cheap voters. Consumer spending determines the health of the economy not inflationary government handouts. Until some miserly Americans start digging into their over loaded bank accounts and start spending money our recession will continue indefinitely.

 

by melpol (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 28 comments) on Monday, Oct 13, 2008 at 7:26:55 AM

Recommend  (0+)

Reply: As If

As If that $56 Trillion were in negotiable assets.

There are not $56 Trillion dollars to spend.  Much of those assets are the paper loans on real estate.  We can't spend our land or houses, but those who tried to with home-equity loans are certainly feeling the pain of their sin now.

by UncleSim (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 577 comments [90 recommended, 6 rejected]) on Monday, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:02:10 PM

Recommend  (0+)

Capitalism Big Lie

Prosperity is not a consequence of Capitalism, it being just a strategy for hoarding the fruits of prosperity in a few hands entitled to it by "divine right". That's why Capitalism is inseparable from the Churches. It needs them to legitimize the strategy... 

1929... It was thirteen years later when I was born... And less than 3 or 4 % of the world population was born before that fateful year... We are loosing the memory of how it was and it is being replaced by the mythology of the Great Depression.

But the truth was that the big crash, was an extended one, which started in the early 1929 and continued until sometime into the 1930's. Actually the turn around didn't occur until 1935.... And by that time the wealth of the stock markets had been reduced to a third of what it had been at the end of 1928...

Looking at the fundamentals which were working at that time, we can see that they haven't changed that much. Technology updated the costumes, but the characters are pretty much the same... The reality is that paper wealth is still paper wealth and when we take our focus away from the real productive activities and focus on accounting gimmicks, the results will always show us our follies...

Markets in Asia and Europe are apparently bouncing back, but it is likely it will be short lived and we will sink deeper as the time goes on... Only a real stimulus geared to get us working again and producing real goods will correct the present conditions... We injected obscene amounts of newly printed money to thaw the financial and investment markets, but the unemployment keeps going up with a catastrophic impact on our communities, and natural events and disasters are contributing to the bad situation. So the world will look like it's getting better, but once the paper is digested, it will resume the downward spiral...

Some say that there is a Conspiracy of the Banks, actually,  there aren't conspiracies in the strict sense of this concept. There are Banks, and the result of their activities, geared to optimize the profit of their shareholders and the rewards of their officers and directors, will always make it appear as that it had to be some kind of collusion...

We have to understand Banks. We have two kinds... One is the neighborhood bank. Not different from the communities' warehouses storing the accumulated food to where the members would go when their own home boards were depleted... and save the day until the next crop...

The other is the Templar Knights invention, the one that stores nothing but moves wealth from one region to another... it is based on trust not on wealth. And we had events in the last thousand years showing us time and again and again that we cannot relax our vigilance and blindly trust anybody. These times aren't different from what had happened other dozen times in the last couple centuries, except for the severity of the blow...

No matter the political system or religious setting, what created our prosperity was always the same thing: I made or produced something that others needed, and others produced or made something I needed. And we traded... This simple concept gets utterly lost in the gimmicks of Accounting.

Which is why even a concept of sharing our resources to put together a productive activity gets bastardized by the so called Capitalism, which isn't even a real philosophy. Just a collection of excuses for skimming the wealth produced by the community without any contribution to the process...

Remembering the real basics gives us in stark clarity which is the path to follow to correct our problems...

by Frank Rommey (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 16 comments [4 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Oct 13, 2008 at 8:51:36 AM

Recommend  (0+)

Fantastic Biblical Argument

Your article is a great argument against usury, but not against Capitalism.

If both Jewish and Christian texts allow interest to be charged to outsiders, then it would seem that charging interest is not inherently wrong, but that it should simply not be charged to friends, family, or like-minded countrymen.

The good Christian or Jew, in order to prevent the sin of charging such interest, should refrain from depositing their savings into banks that lend at interest, and should instead invest their savings in productive ventures that will better employ, feed, clothe, and house their neighbors.

Remember the parable of the talents given to three men.  We are not supposed to hide our assets, but to use them productively.  The one who accumulates enough capital to lend has shown himself to be more productive and efficient than those who seek loans, therefore a loan does less good than an investment in future production.  I think that was the lesson you were getting at.

by UncleSim (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 577 comments [90 recommended, 6 rejected]) on Monday, Oct 13, 2008 at 1:58:24 PM

Recommend  (0+)

After

Jesus's resurrection he told his disciples he had to leave them to go feed sheep in other lands before ascending back into the Kingdom.  His disciples were trying to live Communal lives, but were still in a Mammon system.  At the same time the Tribes of what is now North America were living as Tribal Communalists, but were not in a mammon system.  Are now, but weren't then.

 When Ohio was the far west a white man traveled among some Tribes.  He said of them that they live like the Bible says to live & they don't even have the Book

 The Israelites were a Tribal people's as Jesus is called the Lion of Judah because he was born of the Tribe of Judah.  Long before the Israelites envied the other Nations & asked God to give them a King.

God told them a King would enslave them.  Perhap's God's idea of freedom is far different that the world man's idea of freedom.  God knew the Israelites did not want what he wanted for them, they just envied the other Nations & in their envy & vanity wanted to be like the other Nation.

They ended up with Both Herod's & the Caesar's of Rome as their Kings.  Worldly Kings while they missed the Spiritual King who's Kingdom is not of the world of man, nor worldly thing.

Wasn't some 2000 years ago, & still isn't today.  Time flys when your having fun!

Columbus sailed.  The Pilgrims landed.

The Founders of your Nation stated they patterned your Nation after Rome.  Most were Freemasons & Deists.  Freemasonry was illegal to their King's law since they were a secret organization that were intent on setting up their New Order of the Ages or New World Order.

Both Bush's have called for the NWO as did Tony Blair...the last Leader of France.  Nixon was one of the first to talk about the NWO publically.

In prophecy some consider the NWO may be the globalist system of the Beast with Mystery Babylon being the key to buidling the system of the Beast.  Mystery Babylon fornicates with all the Nations of the Earth.  Possibly through the U.N. as well as through Freemasonary & other secret organizations?

 

 

 

 

 

 

by shadow dancer (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1443 comments [162 recommended, 2 rejected]) on Monday, Oct 13, 2008 at 8:47:35 PM

Recommend  (0+)

Capitalism condemned..............

One good reason to be an atheist or agnoistic is that religion has self evidently failed and is unable to deliver the justice its scriptures describe. That may be because religion, theological in origin, has nothing to do with God. But one can equally ask why humanism as also failed to deliver the goods? [economics of fairness, honesty, ethical behavior]  That may be becasue human nature itself isn't to the job and we over estimate the potential of our species for constructing a truely moral society. But as Monty Python once said: now for something just a little bit different: http://www.dunwanderinpress.org

by R. A. Landbeck (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 11 diaries, 86 comments [8 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Tuesday, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:36:49 PM

Recommend  (0+)

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum