60 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 26 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

What's wrong with S 1487? Let us count the ways...

By       (Page 21 of 22 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   No comments
Message Teresa Hommel
Wrong!

S1487's requirement for observers to be allowed access to polling places only goes so far as permission to watch the processing of absentee and provisional ballots (not regular ballots), and the counting of votes (if done there). The value of this permission is null if local jurisdictions process their absentee and provisional ballots and count their votes elsewhere,.

The burden of administration for this scheme outweighs its value. States must set up procedures to process applications, evaluate compliance with EAC standards, provide public notice of any denial of requests to observe, explain why, provide an opportunity to appeal, and handle appeals.

Solution

The law should require opportunity for meaningful and appropriate observation of all materials, votes, ballots, and equipment by citizens from the time the polls open until the election is certified.

23. Early Voting

As of the general election of November, 2008, States shall conduct at least 15 days of early voting with at least 4 hours per day.[84]

The EAC shall provide guidance for early voting including the nondiscriminatory geographic placement of polling places at which such voting occurs.[85]

Wrong!

Whether or not to implement early voting is a decision that each state should make, and this decision should not be imposed by federal law.

Early voting may lower voter turnout. It requires extra security precautions and citizen observers to provide security for equipment and the ballots that are cast daily during the early voting period.

Solution

Federal law should leave the decision to implement early voting to the states. This section should be eliminated.

24. Counting Provisional Ballots

As of the enactment of this section, states shall count provisional ballots if the voter is registered anywhere in the state and eligible to vote, regardless at which polling place the ballot is cast.[86]

Wrong!

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  |  15  |  16  |  17  |  18  |  19  |  20  |  21  |  22

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Teresa Hommel Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Teresa Hommel is a voting activist in NY and chair of the Task Force On Voting Integrity, Community Church of New York.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

It's Not Too Late! Push Hillary for Recount in 6 Key States

What's wrong with S 1487? Let us count the ways...

What Can We Do Now To Protect the November Election

ACTION ALERT! Amend HR811--contact your members of Congress ASAP

HAVA and HR 811 - Voting Machines' Impact on Minority Communities

New Yorkers, help pass Resolution 2236, to KEEP OUR LEVER MACHINES!

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend