Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
October 9, 2008 at 07:16:29

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 10/9/08:

2008: The Difficulty Stealing it this Time

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Michael Collins (about the author)     Page 1 of 4 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Michael Collins - Writer

Election 2008: The Difficulty Stealing It This Time

Image cc

New 2008 Democratic Primary Voters Are The

Key to Election Protection

Michael Collins
"Scoop" Independent News

(Wash. DC)  There's one major obstacle blocking a theft of the 2008 presidential election.  It's highly significant and challenges even the most devious minds.   That obstacle is "net new" Democratic primary voters in 2008.  "Net new" Democratic primary voters represent the difference between primary turnout in 2004 and 2008.  More on that in a moment.

If you think that 2000 and 2004 were free and fair elections and that the idea of election fraud is specious, that's fine.  You might want to review some of the following.

Al Gore won the 2000 election by over 500,000 votes.  He did not become the president and was denied a recount by the court that made Bush the president.   Stolen election. Case closed.

2004 was not a "red versus blue" election and the winner is still in the U.S. Senate.  The red segment of the total vote (the rural U.S.) was down from 23% of the vote in 2000 to 16% in 2004, with two million less Bush votes, in actual terms, in 2004.  Bush "won" 2004 through a fictitious increase in "big city" voting ("big cities" are defined in the exit polls as those with greater than 500,000 population).

Bush lost rural ("red") votes, his base, yet won the election.  At the same time, we're asked to believe that there was a 66% increase in "big city" turnout in 2004, with Bush doubling his vote total there compared to 2000.  This is absurd (the real figure is closer to a 13% to 15% turnout increase for "big cities" according to actual results).  But that 66% "big city" turnout increase is what the exit pollsters, sponsored by the major media consortium, had to do to make Bush's reported vote count consistent with the final exit poll reported the day after the election. (See Election 2004:  The Urban Legend and Notes from the Underground)

The same people who stole those two elections just took $840 billion of your money and are giving it to their Wall Street donors.  They're the same people who started a war with Iraq based on documented lies and who continued it for five years, with a combined death toll of over one million Iraqi civilians and thousands of U.S. soldiers.  They are the people who won't correct the lie and insist on more of the same.  These people resolutely ignore the looming climate changes to the planet that forecast death to tens of millions and the likelihood of multiple scenes like those after Hurricane Katrina.

Here's the problem for the election thieves.  Their strategies all rely on keeping people from registering, keeping those registered away from the polls, and the magic of electronic voting and tabulation.  It won't work this time.  But first, here's a quick look at the strategies in place.

The most effective and enduring is the disenfranchisement of ex-felons, citizens who have served their time and are no longer charged with anything.  Florida, Texas and Virginia account for nearly 1.5 million citizens, largely poor and black who were denied the right to vote.  They paid their debt to society but they can't participate as citizens because their vote is stolen by the remnants of a racist inspired post reconstruction movement in both the former Confederate states and cooperating state legislatures across the country.

Voter suppression also includes tactics like false notices announcing changes of election dates; police cruisers at intersections near voting places; threats that voter will be  challenged; poorly trained poll workers who send registered voters away; special identification requirements proven to reduce the vote (e.g., photo identification); and much, much more.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

Michael Collins is a writer in the DC area who researches and comments on the corruptions of the new millennium. His articles focus on the financial manipulations of The Money Party, the abuse of power by government, and features on elections and (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Down South by Paul Kruger on Thursday, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:18:28 AM
Yes, without a close vote, theft is too difficult.... by S. E. Hoffman on Thursday, Oct 9, 2008 at 8:16:40 PM
Yes, vote, but don't expect miracles by Charlie L on Friday, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:15:50 AM
What? by Mad Jayhawk on Saturday, Oct 11, 2008 at 6:05:40 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum