|
|
Tags for This Article:
Government (2714) Democratic (1632) Lies (1097) Democracy (453) Fraud (446) Spin (406) Presidential Campaign Democratic (400) Elections_Campaigns (297) Presidential Campaign Democratic (291) Election-Voting Issues News (263) Presidential Campaign Republican (226) Election Throw The Bastards Out (98) President Campaign (82) Broadcasting (37) Election Free Media Advertising (30)
|
Add to My Group
Paul and Obama cheated out of 3rd and 1st by voting machines, hand count fraud Paul Joseph Watson There were several major vote fraud issues to arise out of the New Hampshire primary revolving mainly around Ron Paul and Barack Obama, who were both seemingly cheated out of third and first places respectively as a result of rigged Diebold voting machines and deliberate malfeasance in the counting of hand-written paper ballots. - Obama had a 13 to 15 point lead over Hillary Clinton heading into the primary. Nothing occured that boosted Hillary’s numbers immediately before the election, in fact immediately after the staged crying incident, many pundits argued it could only have harmed her chances. And yet Hillary somehow managed to instigate a near 20 point swing to defeat Obama by three per cent. If not for her 7% swing as a result of Diebold voting machines, Hillary would have lost to Obama. If Obama was struggling he would probably contest this bizarre outcome, but he is likely to accept the results simply to save face. - The New Hampshire town of Sutton admits that it voided every vote Ron Paul received. The Congressman got 31 votes and yet due to a “human error,” Sutton reported zero votes for Ron Paul. How “human error” can explain not counting 31 votes in succession for one single candidate is beyond the pale and Ron Paul’s campaign should ask for a recount across New Hampshire immediately. MORE At first glance, I inadvertently thought of disgruntled Ron Paul supporters, and even though that’s part of the issue, his story alone may lead to a recount of the entire state. Prison Planet also published this article, which demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that something is foul in New Hampshire:
Without fair and honest elections, democracy in America is dead. The situation in New Hampshire is dire, and this nation needs to know that we’re going to have an honest election this year. The MSM may bury this story, but it’s being read far and wide on the Internet, and Ron Paul supporters are being extremely vocal opponents of the recent results. I have a deep fear that is manifesting itself at a speed I didn’t believe possible. America, the country at large, appears to be waking-up, and what worries me is those who are awakening are doing it with a vengeance, and apparently they are mad as hell! Fox News has been exposed for the liars and propagandists they are; instead of organizing massive crowds of protesters to bring it out in the open and let the other channels provide news coverage that Fox News is under virtual siege for this bias and dishonesty, Ron Paul supporters chased Sean Hannity, a Faux News Propagandist, another story I haven’t seen on the MSM. It’s obvious this is an angry crowd, and while I always stand-up for free speech, I can’t help but believing that those who demonstrate in small numbers are dooming themselves to be branded as radicals and eventually swept-up whenever Bush declares martial law. True strength lies in numbers, and as these allegations of election fraud become public knowledge and more people begin demanding answers, it is then when we can band together and force Washington to listen to the people. The anger that was exhibited was justified, and I believe that in our hearts, we’d all like to shout-out our disapproval of a Major News Source that doesn’t even attempt to hide their unparalleled bias to everything that is leading us into fascism. I believe that knowingly misleading millions of people and refusing to report the truth should be a crime, just as other flim-flam artists are treated. Faux News has abandoned any hint of being “fair and balanced”, and even when they are aware that what they are reporting upon is false - they continue with reports that are branded as “news” when they knew they were broadcasting false information. Why isn’t Fox News subject to fraud charges when they knowingly air false reports? Again, truth and honesty are being distorted by Fox News, and in this case, the allegation of falsely reporting facts they know to be incorrect further indicates that Fox believes they are an entity that does not believe in honest reporting.
http://justanothercoverup.com/ I am nothing more than a patriotic American that is doing whatever I can to further the cause of democracy, the rule of law, and am absolutely outraged on how the Bush administration is defying our Congress, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights! Footnote: I write in a style that I believe is appropriate in today's world where we can't trust the Mainstream News Media, and rather than concentrating on one article alone, which may or may not receive the exposure and emphasis it should, I prefer to meld several relevant stories together, that each taken alone may not expose the entire situation, but when taken-in as a whole, tend to give the reader a better understanding of the subject. One article or story alone does not represent the "Big Picture" - but when several are effectively tied-together it often reveals a trend or broader view of the subject matter that is important to completely understand any given situation. http://justanothercoverup.com/
Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008 |
|
