Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
July 29, 2007 at 16:27:30

View Ratings | Rate It

Hitchens - Scheduled to speak at Atheist Convention , Generates Controversy

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Steven Leser (about the author)     Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Steven Leser" <sleser001@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Christopher Hitchens -- Shill, Flack, Mouthpiece, and Hack for the Worst Theocratic Political Regime in U.S. History, the Theocratic Imperialist Cheney-Bush Regime
To:  "Tom Paine" <tompaine1917@yahoo.com>, info@ffrf.org
CC:
    In addition to what Alan wrote, I would also point anyone wanting to decide whether someone like Hitchens should speak alone to FFRF to Hitchen's polemics both against Clinton in the Lewinsky scandal, and more recently his rants against the study in the Lancet http://www.slate.com/id/2151607/?nav=tap3 for the amount of civilian deaths in Iraq.
 
In both of these situations, Hitchens played on appeals to emotion rather than rational and/or scientific principles. To my way of thinking the atheist and FFRF organizations among other similar groups and movements are based on rationalism and scientific principles. Like many studies listed in the Lancet, the study that estimates the amount of deaths in Iraq from the war to date is based on the best peer reviewed scientific and statistical analysis available. Hitchens doesn't even try to provide better science to refute it. He falls back on tried and true red-baiting accusing the editor of the Lancet of being "a full-throated speaker at rallies of the Islamist-Leftist alliance that makes up the British Stop the War Coalition". Nevermind that the editor had nothing to do with the study. He did not commission it. He was not part of the peer-review process for it or anything of the sort.
 
The Lancet is arguably one of the most respected periodicals in the medical community. It is one of the preferred places for doctors and other medical researchers to publish groundbreaking treatment discoveries. Hitchens treats it as if it is an adjunct to 1970's era Pravda for no other reason than a peer reviewed study therein contradicts his politics. Any organization that is on the vanguard of rational thought should think long and hard about giving someone like that a platform all to himself.
 
Steve Leser
 

Tom Paine <tompaine1917@yahoo.com> wrote:
Friday
July 27, 2007
 
Dear Freedom from Religion Foundation:
 
I'm a member of the FFRF, the Atheist Alliance, and an associate member of the Council for Secular Humanism.
 
I have already lobbied Ms. Margaret Downey of the Atheist Alliance on this issue, and I'm lobbying you, now.
 
I will make the same suggestion to you that I made to her about the upcoming Atheist Alliance convention.  This time, I make it about the upcoming FFRF convention.
 
If you are going to have the shill, flack, mouthpiece for the worst theocratic political regime in American history, the Cheney-Bush regime, Christopher Hitchens, speaking, the least you could do is have a prominent public atheist such as Tariq Ali or Gore Vidal, both of whom are anti-imperialists and strong opponents of the Cheney-Bush regime's imperialist invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, speak to counter the lies of Hitchens when he's questioned about the Cheney-Bush policies, and his flacking, lying, mouthpiecing, and shilling for the Cheney-Bush gangsters.
 
I was happy the FFRF sued the Cheney-Bush thugs, and unhappy the FFRF lost its lawsuit over religion-government separation.
 
I like Hitchens' book, God Is Not Great:  How Religion Poisons Everything.
 
But Hitchens is, to me, one of the most reprehensible types of people, for he has given an "atheist" cover to the Cheney-Bush policies.  His raving idiocies about his invented phrase, Islamo-fascism, are designed to whitewash an imperialist system that has done more to reinforce the flow of Near Easterners into the ranks of Islamic extremism than anything else.
.
.
.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

An OEN Editor, Steven Leser specializes in Politics, Science & Health, and Entertainment topics. He has held positions within the Democratic Party including District Chair and Public Relations Chair within county organizations. Steven Leser (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Book Recommendations for "Faith Freedom God"
Answering Only to God: Faith and Freedom in Twenty-First-Century Iran
by Geneive Abdo

$19.00
Lowest New Price $2.00

Number of pages: 320
Publisher: Holt Paperbacks

Answering Only To God Faith
by Geneive Abdo


Number of pages:
Publisher: HOLT, HENRY *

Heaven posed and pressed with questions and demands: Or, Faith's freedom with God warranted
by Ralph Erskine


Number of pages: 32
Publisher: Chapel Library

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Hitchens by Dale Hill on Sunday, Jul 29, 2007 at 6:18:49 PM
I agree entirely with all the above criticisms of Hitchens. by Richard Mynick on Sunday, Jul 29, 2007 at 11:12:13 PM
Since reading your response I have been looking for videos by Steven Leser on Monday, Jul 30, 2007 at 12:30:59 AM
Here's a link to some of the video, & help in finding the by Richard Mynick on Monday, Jul 30, 2007 at 10:04:48 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum