![]() |
By Ron Fullwood (about the author) Page 2 of 2 page(s)
More important, Bush wants us to know that the "liberty" he's spreading with his invasion and occupations in the Mideast isn't merely the undoing and demise of anyone in the way of his military advance into their territory, but is actually "God's gift to humanity."
"God is not on the side of any nation, yet we know He is on the side of justice," Bush told Time in 2004. "Our finest moments as a nation have come when we faithfully served the cause of justice for our own citizens, and for the people of other lands," he asserted.
If Ahmadinejad had a moment of exhilaration and grandeur right before he entered Columbia University's hall he can be excused for imagining that he was on the verge of winning some contest and receiving some prize for his bold attempt to indoctrinate a crowd which wasn't hostage to the manipulations he uses at home to get attention and agreement. To those looking on outside the U.S., Americans must appear fairly tolerant of Bush and his aggressions abroad.
Since the day he assumed power in Iran, Ahmadinejad has been elevated by the insistence of Bush in waging what he often calls his "ideological struggle" against 'enemies' who threaten his ambition to dominate the rest of the world by the force of our military. Without Bush's occupation of Iraq, there would be no 'threat' to the U.S. from Iran. Without Bush's insistence on waging his "ideological" war, there would be nothing to amplify the nonsense from Ahmadinejad; which, by the way, college students at Columbia were able to just shrug off as lacking of knowledge or merit when he offered it to them.
"When you come to a place like this it makes you simply ridiculous," Columbia president Lee Bollinger told him.
And who didn't think of our own country's "petty and cruel dictator," when Bollinger scolded the Iranian president before he spoke? Or reflected on our own police-state as Ahmadinejad spoke of governments which "tap telephones." It was fortunate though, that Columbia University was there to uphold our country's end of Bush's ideological argument that supposes support for 'freedoms' he'd impose on the rest of the world.
In the proper forum for any "ideological" battle -- a discussion, instead of a bloody, destabilizing invasion and occupation -- Ahmadinejad gave as good as he's got, without a ripple of the unrest, chaos, and destruction that Bush has caused waging his own in Iraq. New Yorkers confronted the Iranian without a shot fired. Now, just what was all that saber-rattling about again?
1 | 2
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
| 3 comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |