Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
August 29, 2007 at 11:33:20

View Ratings | Rate It

Banning some words HERE on This Website

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Rob Kall (about the author)     Page 2 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

This is discussion of the USE of the word. On the other hand, we really don't want to see articles on Islamicist or Zionist plots or conspiracies. And we will not tolerate quotation of other people talking about zionist or islamicist plots or conspiracies.

While we're at it, the "N" word is also banned, except in circumstances like those described above, and even then, it should be referred to as "the N word." (added at 6:54 PM EST: curse words are discouraged. The "C" word, offensive to many women, is also banned, and bigoted and hate speech are not tolerated.

Violators will be warned, and depending on their connection to the community, be given one or more chances, unless it is their first posting, in which case, they may be summarily banned. You dont' start off a conversation in a new community with hate speech, or language that is oft abused for hate speech.

The bottom line is that criticism of Israel is fine. Defense of Israel is fine. Criticism of Israeli settlers and politicians is fine. Criticism of all Jews in Israel, or all Jews, or all Muslims in Palestine or all Muslims is not acceptable. (added at 6:52 PM EST; Criticism of religions' behaviors, policy, extremes, is touchy and must be done without vitriol or hate, but it is allowed and has been allowed often on this site.)

It is expected that we will lose some readers and some writers with this policy. But we also believe that this policy will build on the civility and integrity of the site. Those who want to raise complaints will be able to do so, but will be required to do it with language that is precise, clear and aimed at shining light on truth, not indulging anger or hate.

This new policy is added to a previous policy of rejecting articles that dwell on the history of the middle east. WE've found that articles dwelling on the history of the middle east, of the attack on the US Ship by Israel, these cover old ground and serve no useful value except to enable the writer or commenter to emote and express complaints, criticism, hatred of Israel. We're not interested in any of those. As said above, articles or comments which criticize current actions, policies or behaviors are acceptable.

Our site has a history of being very open to this kind of discussion. Any attempt to accuse it of bias or censorship can easily be refuted by a simple search on the tags for Israel, Palestine, Middle east. This new policy will enable us to continue keeping the discussion open, while minimizing the worst abuses of the forum we provide.

Comments and suggestions are welcome.

added after comments started:

Wikipedia defines censorship :

Censorship is defined as the removal and/or withholding of information from the public by a controlling group or body.

There's none of that here-- just the challenge to use other words.

The truth is that if the words were used with integrity and good intentions, there wouldn't be a problem But they are not. They are abused as thinly veiled ways for anti-semites to spew their hate. This is abusive and painful to many and there is no reason why it should be tolerated. In a totally controlled media situation, like most mainstream media sites operate, it is possible to pay someone to screen every comment before it is posted. There, that kind of use of the words can be filtered out. But we don't have those resources here, so we made a choice, to protect our readers, our community from such abuse. The decision was made after more than a year of deliberation and attempts at other approaches.

added at 5:15 EST:

There are hip hoppers who use the N word. That doesn't make it right. Most African Americans find it offensive. Most Americans find it offensive. And if people abuse the words, then it hurts innocent people. And I don't see you complaining about that word, which, at one time, say 50 or 100 years ago, was socially acceptable.

Anyway, I got tired of dealing with all the hate that came with the words. By the way, it's already working. Some people using other words, are showing their true antisemitic nature. Others will be able to talk about any issue. And very likely, by having to use other words, they'll have to think about the issues in different, less reflex-driven ways.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Book Recommendations for "Anti semitism Censorship"

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
250 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

As a person by Mark Sashine on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 12:23:48 PM
No Isms? by Nick on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 6:02:25 PM
Consciousness and progress... by Rob Kall on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 8:55:12 AM
Hi Rob by John R Moffett on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 12:27:28 PM
Agree to agree with a caveat... by Sandy Sand on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 1:04:20 PM
Race vs Religion by Barbara Peterson on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:22:50 PM
Barbara by pratliff94 on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 11:59:53 PM
Excellent info. by Barbara Peterson on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:01:32 PM
Barbara by pratliff94 on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 7:35:11 PM
Valleygirl by pratliff94 on Saturday, Sep 1, 2007 at 11:25:52 AM
Not to make light of an important subject... by Charlie L on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 12:35:04 PM
bad idea by Laudyms on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 12:43:03 PM
But they fail in doing what you say by Steven Leser on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:49:50 AM
There is no cheap or easy way to avoid responsibility by Laudyms on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 1:36:55 PM
Not good enough by Steven Leser on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 6:49:52 PM
Banning by chazky bennett on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 12:46:00 PM
Alternatives? by delia on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 12:56:35 PM
Why use euphemisms? Use words that are more exact by Steven Leser on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:48:39 AM
where do you stop? by James at IRB on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 1:04:43 PM
just a little additional note by Mark Sashine on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 1:10:24 PM
Another word or two, if you please by Mary Pitt on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 1:13:27 PM
Idiotic - but typical by Rick Fisk on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 1:15:50 PM
Who cares what that idiot Likudnik says... by Steven Leser on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:50:56 AM
I Thought We'd Be Losing My Old Faves by Dusty Nathan on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 1:15:54 PM
My faves, too, Dusty!!! by joanakelly on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 4:46:02 PM
Censorship by Maxwell on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 1:16:28 PM
Like I said by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 1:28:29 PM
Rob just for your info/interest by Brett Paatsch on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 4:58:49 PM
Knee Jerk? by Rick Fisk on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 7:49:14 PM
Probably A Mistake by Ed Menken on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 8:45:17 PM
EdMenken by pratliff94 on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:43:43 AM
'Z*onist', Isl*micist, and Anti-S*mite by Jim Arnold on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 10:40:25 AM
Challenge by jasper sneed on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 11:20:02 PM
"Like I said"? by hccllc on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 1:17:30 PM
even you felt the need to use "Zionist" by Laudyms on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 1:47:51 PM
Coming clean on pressures by Rob Kall on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 10:17:33 AM
Unreal.... by Joe Plummer on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 1:21:30 PM
So, it's ok for men to call us C*NTS here, but... by Mars Caulton on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 1:26:11 PM
No by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 1:59:30 PM
UMMM.. by k kelly on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 1:30:13 PM
Common Decency by GitarChris on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:39:09 PM
this doesn't make sense by Michael Lubin on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 1:36:41 PM
see my addendum at the bottom of the article by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 2:22:09 PM
I can hardly participate by Blue Pilgrim on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 1:47:06 PM
Please, reconsider by Mark Sashine on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 1:57:54 PM
"Let's try to walk in Rob's shoes....." by jasper sneed on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 11:39:04 PM
Panurg by pratliff94 on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:58:40 AM
Please don't leave Blue Pilgrim by Dr. Larry Semark on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 7:47:03 PM
Nope by CD Rodgers on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 9:34:44 PM
Blue Pilgrim by jasper sneed on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 11:54:37 PM
Censorship in ANY form is Absolute BS by Thaddam Rawke on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 1:50:10 PM
UNBELIEVABLE by WML on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 1:58:25 PM
Disagree by Bob Gormley on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 2:00:17 PM
The strangest thing by Blue Pilgrim on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 2:02:09 PM
bluepilgrim by Tony Forest on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 2:11:44 PM
They work when I try them by Blue Pilgrim on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 2:40:54 PM
see by Tony Forest on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:02:32 PM
Shocked! Shocked! by John R Moffett on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 7:50:09 AM
Agreed, not to mention by Steven Leser on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:55:30 AM
Nearly a thousand comments! by Brett Paatsch on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 5:24:41 PM
Include Terrorist by Bernard on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 2:07:44 PM
Censorship Sux by Tony Forest on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 2:08:07 PM
You call Jews "Zionazis"? by Edward Olshaker on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 2:17:05 PM
edward 106 by pratliff94 on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 1:07:23 AM
And Another by Bernard on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 2:24:33 PM
Not So Sure I Agree... by D. Edward Farrar on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 2:28:56 PM
agreement by Sheila Jackson on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:10:42 PM
Censorship is the last resort of a fascist mentality. by Esbe on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 2:29:27 PM
There IS "an anti-semetic [sic] problem here" by Michael Lubin on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 2:34:28 PM
Where is the Semite? by Esbe on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:47:21 PM
You see by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:54:26 PM
When words cause hurt..... by jasper sneed on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:23:05 AM
You add much wisdom by Rob Kall on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 10:21:52 AM
whatever word you want to use, your comment was prejudiced by Michael Lubin on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 6:44:21 PM
"Code" words & hate speech & history by S. E. Hoffman on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:26:01 AM
On Your Excellent and Thoughtful Post... by jasper sneed on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 2:02:16 AM
S.E. Hoffman by pratliff94 on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 9:53:08 AM
Nuanceman by pratliff94 on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 1:27:53 AM
No it wasn't (Prejudiced), but yours definately is. by Esbe on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:32:11 AM
You are a word abuser and self admitted hater by Rob Kall on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 10:00:20 PM
Evil, human and otherwise. by Esbe on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 1:55:06 AM
you came here because by Rob Kall on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 12:59:47 PM
Bigots Hiding Behind Fancy Words. by Jayne County on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 9:25:25 PM
This is an excellent example of why called you dishonest. by Esbe on Tuesday, Sep 4, 2007 at 7:06:01 PM
You're an articulate person by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:02:36 PM
Rob... by Esbe on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:37:58 PM
well by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:49:03 PM
Blaming Israel. by Esbe on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 4:02:30 PM
A bit Exagerated, eh? by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 4:34:51 PM
Without apology. by Esbe on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:14:58 PM
Agree by Barbara Peterson on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 5:13:01 PM
What a Surprise! by mellowinman on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:28:03 PM
A VOICE OF REASON by Frank J. Ranelli on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 2:42:37 PM
I sympathize with the editorial burden but what's the point? by Michael Lubin on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 2:48:41 PM
Not just editorial by Frank J. Ranelli on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:47:19 PM
I do realize that the editors are all volunteers by Michael Lubin on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 4:54:15 PM
Now I've seen it all..... by jasper sneed on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:31:40 AM
Banning some words. by kanawah on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 2:47:31 PM
Censorship by walley on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 2:54:49 PM
Language is a poor way to communicate... by D. Edward Farrar on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:06:00 PM
Banning the word Zionist by brisa on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:04:35 PM
Nah. by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:51:59 PM
Use Likudnik by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:44:57 PM
Stephen by pratliff94 on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 1:45:35 AM
It really is awful to see people use "Z--n****" as a by Steven Leser on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 2:20:58 PM
Respond or rate the comment; do not ban by Christie on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:05:27 PM
Moderation is needed by Frank J. Ranelli on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:42:29 PM
Good grief..... by jasper sneed on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:50:06 AM
some good points-- How to Handle this Software-wise by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 4:00:18 PM
My point by Frank J. Ranelli on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 4:21:45 PM
Two solutions that seemed to not work very well. by Ed Buffey on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:25:54 PM
Other sites... by jasper sneed on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 2:27:15 AM
WE do have a flagging system by Rob Kall on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 10:03:30 AM
Hate Words by Jim Freeman on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:13:54 PM
Good idea by Lynn Hirshman on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:14:46 PM
Words and ideas by Ray Smith on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:20:03 PM
You prove my point by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 4:06:53 PM
Here's an idea Rob by Rick Fisk on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 7:57:25 PM
Just to add to the flow... by chariotdrvr14 on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:23:50 PM
Censorship by Rafe Pilgrim on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:27:03 PM
Lowe's is blue by GitarChris on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:31:42 PM
Confusion of language. by fra59e on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:34:43 PM
Right on the money. by Esbe on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 3:50:56 PM
Why not just MODERATE those words? by Michael Lubin on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 4:01:42 PM
Censorship of this kind is wrong by Constance Lavender on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 4:11:14 PM
See comment above by Frank J. Ranelli on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 4:26:38 PM
Manpower.... by jasper sneed on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:10:29 AM
Ban the word "Bush" by Gallaher on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 4:33:31 PM
Civil Discourse by Barbara Peterson on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 4:45:00 PM
Banning by Bill Cain on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 4:50:57 PM
I don't recall getting one single UFO article, ever by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 5:16:36 PM
Wow, what a torrent! by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 4:58:27 PM
I Got Kicked Off Another Site by Timothy V. Gatto on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 5:13:50 PM
I Never Repied to My Own Comment Before. by Timothy V. Gatto on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 5:19:51 PM
No it's not by Mark A. Goldman on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 2:23:27 PM
Those people you describe in Israel who... by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:48:37 PM
Please check the end of the article for new commentary by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 5:34:57 PM
Goodness, Rob, what a hornet's nest! by Mary Pitt on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 5:42:07 PM
To Mumz by Sheila Samples on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 8:29:36 PM
Hot Comment is an Indication of Regard by Jim Freeman on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 6:15:09 PM
This site is private property by Dana Pico on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 6:31:39 PM
Clarification by Dana Pico on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 6:46:10 PM
Dana, whatever Z--n*** once meant, it is no longer so by Steven Leser on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:00:37 PM
You'd have a difficult time . . . by Dana Pico on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 4:13:47 PM
Wikipedias definition of Likud/Likudnik is excellent by Steven Leser on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 6:57:28 PM
And here is wikipedia's neocon definition by Steven Leser on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 7:03:50 PM
USA - Free Speech Just Don't Question Israeli Agression by Ed Encho on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 6:42:42 PM
Hmm. First you tell me f*ck you. (which I deleted) by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 8:09:32 PM
Our esteemed host wrote: by Dana Pico on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 7:02:01 PM
Some good points by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 8:17:45 PM
Don't declare something a failure until it has actually been by Dana Pico on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 8:34:14 PM
And I won't claim that we are always perfect. by Dana Pico on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 8:36:18 PM
Just a quick thought.... by Frank J. Ranelli on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 8:38:21 PM
it's too bad by Michael Lubin on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 7:02:45 PM
See Ya by Steve on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 7:08:51 PM
Is this a Test? by Thomas Anderson on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 7:35:43 PM
Here is a perfect example of WHY by Frank J. Ranelli on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 8:05:11 PM
So, we should just give up reasoned debate . . . by Dana Pico on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 9:20:58 AM
Stalemate by Frank J. Ranelli on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 2:57:47 PM
Mr Ranelli suggested: by Dana Pico on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 8:14:28 PM
Perfect Example by Frank J. Ranelli on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 3:14:29 PM
My two cents worth by Andris on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 8:07:21 PM
Bravo by Richard Mathis on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 8:30:43 PM
good quote by Frank J. Ranelli on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:44:14 PM
A modest proposal by Abraham007 on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 9:13:01 PM
I did by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 9:34:14 PM
In a nutshell by Frank J. Ranelli on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:47:21 PM
Yeah by Mark A. Goldman on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 2:38:16 PM
On banning some words on this website by Laur on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 9:25:56 PM
Inneffective New Policy, At Best by Jeremy R. Hammond on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 9:36:38 PM
Perhaps.... by S. E. Hoffman on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:53:06 AM
re editing by Jeremy R. Hammond on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 9:43:49 PM
I don't know that this policy really helps by J. Edward Tremlett on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 9:55:36 PM
Tattooed by cluelessfl on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:00:06 PM
Censorship should apply to context. by Justin Finney on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:05:28 PM
Looking at it as a Challenge by Eileen Fleming on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:20:35 PM
Bravo, z--nist/z--nism are racist terms... by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:38:05 PM
It is interesting to me that by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 11:01:53 PM
Civil Discourse? by carl on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:17:38 AM
UFO or Cherubim? by Jayne County on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:20:05 AM
Having read the article... by Pappy on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 1:53:30 AM
First and formost, I envision OpEdNews as a Community by Rob Kall on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 5:42:39 AM
Censorship by FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTIT NOT ON THIS WESBITE on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 2:29:58 AM
Every site has editors &rejected writers crying sour grapes by Rob Kall on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 5:51:59 AM
Excellence is now equal to censorship? by Frank J. Ranelli on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 4:43:51 PM
WILL CONTINUE TO USE THEOFASCIST, ETC. by rhalfhill on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 2:57:19 AM
see how easy it is to follow the rules? by Rob Kall on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 5:57:38 AM
There's a LOT of things you cannot say: by Dusty Nathan on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 5:01:08 AM
SIMILAR QUESTIONS by WML on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 5:48:18 AM
NO. Wrong. by Rob Kall on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 6:02:33 AM
Your Friendly UFO by Dom Jermano on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 6:12:37 AM
Banning some words HERE on This Website by Eddy Schmid on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 6:13:19 AM
Thanks for proving a theory by Rob Kall on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 7:51:54 AM
My comment will be lost in the crowd by ardee D. on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 6:45:19 AM
I OBJECT, YOUR HONOR! by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 7:51:49 AM
No argument on some. by Rob Kall on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 8:38:47 AM
America- 160 comments:) RememberThe GOAL! by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 8:31:25 AM
HEY! by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 8:49:28 AM
An old offensive article on this site by Mary Shaw on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 9:07:51 AM
Actually by Rob Kall on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 9:49:12 AM
Once it's deleted from OpEdNews.com.... by Mary Shaw on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 9:27:42 AM
Has OPed.com Gone Completely Morally mad and morally dead? by Herbert Calhoun on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 9:32:26 AM
OK. Pretend you're an editor by Rob Kall on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 10:03:16 AM
Reply to comment: "OK. Pretend you're an editor" by Herbert Calhoun on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 3:13:10 PM
"Has OPed.com Gone Completely Morally mad and morally dead?" by Herbert Calhoun on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 5:32:37 AM
garble garble is in the eye of the turkey by Rob Kall on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 10:39:07 AM
banned words by LennyStone on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 9:54:53 AM
Good Point.... but by Rob Kall on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 10:10:01 AM
the z word by TedTheJackal on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 10:03:53 AM
There was a site once ... by Eric Newcomb on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 10:49:47 AM
Methinks he doth protest too much by johndoraemi on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:28:05 AM
Why alter policy on the basis of a racist organization like by Steven Leser on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:03:00 PM
Way to completely miss the point (whooooosh) by johndoraemi on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 2:18:42 PM
Nope, I didnt miss the point, you missed the point. by Steven Leser on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 7:09:07 PM
We're a news and opinion site by Rob Kall on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:09:39 PM
Not settled. by johndoraemi on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 2:31:21 PM
The use of the word in new articles is not needed to by Steven Leser on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 7:10:45 PM
Really at the depths of knee jerk non-thinking by johndoraemi on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 11:50:54 AM
Member ranking of articles... by Rob Kall on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 12:52:21 PM
Self Censorship by Abbas Sadeghian, Ph.D. on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:33:57 AM
This slope is slipping the other way by Rob Kall on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:20:26 PM
I've noticed that no one could counter my defense of Rob's by Steven Leser on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:46:06 AM
Steve, respectfully by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:57:34 AM
All true, but the use of the word has changed and now means by Steven Leser on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:07:21 PM
OK by Mark A. Goldman on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 2:17:32 PM
A better question would be, why would it bother you by Steven Leser on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 4:19:48 PM
What a surprise. by mellowinman on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:24:18 PM
Mirroring Hateful Religious Supremacy by claytOnleOnwintOn on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 1:01:08 PM
What about the B-Word? by ALONE on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 1:10:56 PM
Nope. Do a search. nothing by Rob Kall on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 1:33:49 PM
I have a better idea. by Mark A. Goldman on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 2:05:54 PM
This Isn't Censorship by Alice Lillie on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 2:53:59 PM
Well of course it's censorship. by Mark A. Goldman on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 3:39:31 PM
Banning words by Patico on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 6:31:26 PM
So many people, so many misconceptions ... by Eric Newcomb on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 8:11:56 PM
Ridiculous and Ineffective Policy by Jeremy R. Hammond on Thursday, Aug 30, 2007 at 9:40:19 PM
Since Z--n*** has no clear meaning and can mean whatever by Steven Leser on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 8:08:46 AM
Meaning of "Zionism" by Jeremy R. Hammond on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 9:40:56 PM
More by Jeremy R. Hammond on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 9:42:47 PM
Does this apply to newsletters as well? by FOIA Gras on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 1:44:51 AM
Civil discourse is the goal by Rob Kall on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 10:47:22 AM
one more can't hurt ... by ladybroadoak on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 2:09:07 AM
some great comments by Rob Kall on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 1:19:16 PM
Thanks Rob .. by ladybroadoak on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 11:36:10 PM
Quality control by rapfinance on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 6:07:01 AM
Bottom Line by Jeremy R. Hammond on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 9:56:07 PM
wow by Anthony Wade on Saturday, Sep 1, 2007 at 12:54:51 AM
the Khazar canard by Michael Lubin on Saturday, Sep 1, 2007 at 4:56:42 PM
Freedom of speech by Diana Madison on Saturday, Sep 1, 2007 at 7:55:31 PM
Please do by Sarah Hamilton on Saturday, Sep 1, 2007 at 8:58:18 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum