Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
December 9, 2007 at 08:04:10

View Ratings | Rate It

Mortgage Industry Insider Says the Mortgage Mess is Far Far Worse than You Suppose

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Richard Clark (about the author)     Page 2 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

    Were the plan implemented, it would allow holders of mortgage-backed securities to put off marking down their assets.

    The real estate and credit bubbles that have now burst, victimizing millions of working class and middle class families, were intimately bound up with fraudulent and predatory lending practices encouraged by the biggest US banks and investment houses.

    What makes it even more disgusting is that it's precisely these arrogant bastards who created the mess, which they profited from, and then they laugh as they stick ordinary people with the fallout."

==========================

    And now the warning from mortgage industry insider Mark Hanson, as featured at the MarketWatch web site:

The Government and the market are trying to boil this down to a ’sub-prime’ thing, especially with all constant talk of ‘resets’. But sub-prime loans were only a small piece of the mortgage mess. And sub-prime loans are not the only ones with resets. What we are experiencing should be called ‘The Mortgage Meltdown’ because many different exotic loan types are imploding currently belonging to what lenders considered ‘qualified’ or ‘prime’ borrowers. This will continue to worsen over the next few of years. When ‘prime’ loans begin to explode to a degree large enough to catch national attention, the ratings agencies will jump on board and we will have ‘Round 2′. It is not that far away.

    Since 2003, when lending first started becoming extremely lax, a small percentage of the loans were true sub-prime fixed or arms.   But sub-prime is what is being focused upon to draw attention away from the fact the lenders and Wall Street banks made all loans too easy to attain for everyone. They can explain away the reason sub-prime loans are imploding due to the weakness of the borrower.

    How will they explain foreclosures in wealthy cities across the nation involving borrowers with 750 scores when their loan adjusts higher or terms change overnight because they reached their maximum negative potential on a neg-am Pay Option ARM for instance?

    Sub-prime aren’t the only kind of loans imploding. Second mortgages, hybrid intermediate-term ARMS, and the soon-to-be infamous Pay Option ARM are also feeling substantial pressure.

    The latter three loan types mostly were considered ‘prime’ so they are being overlooked, but will haunt the financial markets for years to come. Versions of these loans were made available to sub-prime borrowers of course, but the vast majority were considered ‘prime’ or Alt-A. The caveat is that the differentiation between Prime and ALT-A got smaller and smaller over the years until finally in late 2005/2006 there was virtually no difference in program type or rate.

    The bailout we are hearing about for sub-prime borrowers will be the first of many. Sub-prime only represents about 25% of the problem loans out there. What about the second mortgages sitting behind the sub-prime first, for instance? Most have seconds. Why aren’t they bailing those out too? Those rates have risen dramatically over the past few years as the Prime jumped from 4% to 8.25% recently. Seconds are primarily based upon the prime rate. One can argue that many sub-prime first mortgages on their own were not a problem for the borrowers but the added burden of the second put on the property many times after-the-fact was too much for the borrower.

    Most sub-prime loans in existence are refinances not purchase-money loans. This means that more than likely they pulled cash out of their home, bought things and are now going under. Perhaps the loan they hold now is their third or forth in the past couple years. Why are bad borrowers, who cannot stop going to the home-ATM getting bailed out?

    The Government says they are going to use the credit score as one of the determining factors. But we have learned over the past year that credit scores are not a good predictor of future ability to repay.

    This is because over the past five years you could refi your way into a great score. Every time you were going broke and did not have money to pay bills, you pulled cash out of your home by refinancing your first mortgage or upping your second. You pay all your bills, buy some new clothes, take a vacation and your score goes up!

    The ’second mortgage implosion’, ‘Pay-Option implosion’ and ‘Hybrid Intermediate-term ARM implosion’ are all happening simultaneously and about to heat up drastically. Second mortgage liens were done by nearly every large bank in the nation and really heated up in 2005, as first mortgage rates started rising and nobody could benefit from refinancing. This was a way to keep the mortgage money flowing. Second mortgages to 100% of the homes value with no income or asset documentation were among the best sellers at CITI, Wells, WAMU, Chase, National City and Countrywide. We now know these are worthless especially since values have indeed dropped and those who maxed out their liens with a 100% purchase or refi of a second now owe much more than their property is worth.

    How are the banks going to get this junk second mortgage paper off their books? Moody’s is expecting a 15% default rate among ‘prime’ second mortgages. Just think the default rate in lower quality such as sub-prime. These assets will need to be sold for pennies on the dollar to free up capacity for new vintage paper or borrowers allowed to pay 50 cents on the dollar, for instance, to buy back their note.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=JCpLDBUAAAC

Several years after receiving my M.A. in social science (interdisciplinary studies) I was an instructor at S.F. State University for a year, but then went back to designing automated machinery, and then tech writing, in Silicon Valley. I've always (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
23 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

OK now I have a headache by ardee D. on Sunday, Dec 9, 2007 at 9:56:48 AM
You make very good points, Ardee by Richard Clark on Sunday, Dec 9, 2007 at 1:10:28 PM
As did you by ardee D. on Monday, Dec 10, 2007 at 7:09:23 AM
You bet it's far worse . . . by Edward Ulysses Cate on Sunday, Dec 9, 2007 at 9:58:49 AM
Spot on! by Richard Clark on Sunday, Dec 9, 2007 at 1:14:37 PM
By design by Joann on Sunday, Dec 9, 2007 at 10:46:32 AM
...Missing one big point......... by serryjw on Sunday, Dec 9, 2007 at 12:23:09 PM
Far Deeper by Mike Folkerth on Sunday, Dec 9, 2007 at 12:37:55 PM
Housing is a part of the economy by ardee D. on Monday, Dec 10, 2007 at 7:28:54 AM
Global Derivatives Market Expands to $516 Trillion by Better World Order on Sunday, Dec 9, 2007 at 2:43:34 PM
Bursting bubble syndrome by Dave Kisor on Sunday, Dec 9, 2007 at 6:19:05 PM
wicked hyperbole by M. Davis on Sunday, Dec 9, 2007 at 8:27:14 PM
Mortgage mess is a pit they dug for themselves by truthtruffle on Sunday, Dec 9, 2007 at 8:25:43 PM
mortgage mess. by vincent passiatore on Sunday, Dec 9, 2007 at 11:19:04 PM
Vinnie by Mike Folkerth on Monday, Dec 10, 2007 at 8:48:48 AM
I am puzzled by ardee D. on Monday, Dec 10, 2007 at 7:21:44 AM
Just not so by Mike Folkerth on Monday, Dec 10, 2007 at 9:13:44 AM
aside to Mike by ardee D. on Tuesday, Dec 11, 2007 at 7:16:53 AM
Jesse' on the job! by Richard Clark on Monday, Dec 10, 2007 at 10:09:25 PM
Ardee d by Mike Folkerth on Tuesday, Dec 11, 2007 at 7:43:52 AM
Who's goin' to benefit from the 'freeze'? How and why? by Richard Clark on Tuesday, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:56:14 AM
Understanding the full depth and scope of the problem by Richard Clark on Wednesday, Dec 12, 2007 at 12:14:19 AM
Are most homeowners really home owners? by Richard Clark on Thursday, Dec 13, 2007 at 8:10:22 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum