Tags for This Article:

Obama-Barack (4547)  Electronic Voting (2841)  Voting Integrity (2709)  Democracy (1945)  Voting Technology (1919)  2008 Election Presidential (1309)  Corporations E-Voting (541)  Polls (458)  New Hampshire (340)  Hillary Clinton (297)  Optical Scan Voting Machines (135)  Ron Paul (75)  Primary Interference (35) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ;  (less...)
Group(s): Add to My Group
January 9, 2008 at 23:17:03

Headlined on 1/9/08:
Inherent Uncertainty and NH's Primary Results

by Rady Ananda     Page 2 of 2 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Dave Berman describes this idea in two ways:

[W]e have the intentional creation and perpetuation of inherent uncertainty. It serves the power structure to keep the masses divided. Wedge issues are just the most superficial and obvious ways. More insidious and apparently not as easy to recognize is the rift in the perception of reality created by inherent uncertainty.

He explains further, in tonight’s email to me:

I think inherent uncertainty is intentionally created through various means including sheer laziness and false balance, but also in situations where "truth" can never really be known - secret vote counting, for example. Whatever is published is presented as if it were a certain fact….

Leaving it to the media consumer to decide also facilitates a rift in the perception of reality. This is the linchpin of it all, since matters of fact are forcibly devolved into differences of opinion that can never be resolved (since we can never know the true outcome of any election counted in secret).

Instead of fighting about who was right, the pollsters or the machines, we are better served by removing machines from public elections and reaching conclusive outcomes - results that can be repeatedly verified by anyone.

We do this by upgrading to hand-counted paper ballots at the precinct, on election night, before all who wish to observe. Results are then posted at the precinct for all to verify.

There are several hundred precincts in the nation that still hand count paper ballots, on election night. It takes 4-5 hours, depending on the number of counting teams. It’s done at the precinct level, which handles about 1,000 registered voters. A fresh team of counters can be pooled from the list of registered voters, and the audit verification is part of the hand-counting process.

Hand-counting is simple – we’ve been doing it for over 125 years on a mass scale. It’s the least expensive, and the easiest to secure from fraud. It is a “high order civic duty” according to Sally Castleman, Executive Director of Election Defense Alliance.

Transparent vote counting will yield inherent certainty, since any group of people can count the voter-prepared ballots to arrive at the same conclusive outcomes. This is what we deserve and demand.

Call or write your representative and demand these machines be banned from use in the United States. Stand up for transparent vote counting that leads to conclusive results. Stand up for democracy. Do it now.

 1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
All voting machines should be banned from public elections. Given all the scientific evidence condemning computerized voting systems; given all the

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

In 2004, Rady Ananda joined the growing community of citizen journalists. Initially focused on elections, she investigated the 2004 Ohio election, organizing, training and leading several forays into counties to photograph the 2004 ballots. She officially served at three recounts, including the 2004 recount. She also organized and led the team that audited Franklin County Ohio's 2006 election, proving the number of signatures did not match official results. Her work appears in three books. Her blogs also address religious, gender, sexual and racial equality, as well as environmental issues; and are sprinkled with book and film reviews on various topics. She spent most of her working life as a legal investigator for private lawyers, and five years as an editor. She currently serves as a senior editor at OpEdNews. All material offered here is the property of Rady Ananda, copyright 2006, 2007, 2008. Permission is granted to repost, with proper attribution including the original link. "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." Tell the truth anyway.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 comments

Anon
AnonAnon

Let's have a recount

For all of us who are interested in a recount, there seems to be a real possibility of one. There were 42 candidates on the Dem + Rep ballots and any one of them can request a recount. It seems like Albert Howard, one of those 42, is inclined to do so. If we can contact him and offer to raise the money for recount, he will likely request an official recount. Our chance is now.

See below for the news story about him.

"It was back to reality for presidential candidate Albert Howard of Ann Arbor, back behind the wheel of his Checker cab waiting for passengers at Detroit Metro Airport.

The father of eight savored his 40 votes in the New Hampshire presidential GOP primary. Howard was among 42 also-rans who paid $1,000 to get on the New Hampshire ballot, and he was something of a celebrity, interviewed by Time magazine, the New York Times, Boston Globe and the nightly ABC News.

At one point, his vote total climbed to 178, then dropped. He is asking the New Hampshire Secretary of State for a recount. Howard said he was in awe that even 40 people picked him."
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080110/NEWS06/801100364

by Anon (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments) on Thursday, January 10, 2008 at 3:14:12 AM
 


In 2004, Rady Ananda joined the growing community of citizen journalists. Initially focused on elections, she investigated the 2004 Ohio election, organizing, training and leading several forays into counties to photograph the 2004 ballots. She officially served at three recounts, including the 2004 recount. She also organized and led the team that audited Franklin County Ohio's 2006 election, proving the number of signatures did not match official results. Her work appears in three books. ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Rady AnandaIn 2004, Rady Ananda joined the growing community of citizen journalists. Initially focused on elections, she investigated the 2004 Ohio election, organizing, training and leading several forays into counties to photograph the 2004 ballots. She officially served at three recounts, including the 2004 recount. She also organized and led the team that audited Franklin County Ohio's 2006 election, proving the number of signatures did not match official results. Her work appears in three books. ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Mixed reviews on the recount idea

thanks, Anon, for posting this. I've got my ear to the ground and there is a debate right now about whether or not to pursue a recount, a full scale investigation (citizen-run, not government-run), and other ideas.

I'll post more as I learn the particulars.

by Rady Ananda (127 articles, 289 quicklinks, 37 diaries, 1124 comments) on Thursday, January 10, 2008 at 8:19:43 PM
 


In 2004, Rady Ananda joined the growing community of citizen journalists. Initially focused on elections, she investigated the 2004 Ohio election, organizing, training and leading several forays into counties to photograph the 2004 ballots. She officially served at three recounts, including the 2004 recount. She also organized and led the team that audited Franklin County Ohio's 2006 election, proving the number of signatures did not match official results. Her work appears in three books. ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Rady AnandaIn 2004, Rady Ananda joined the growing community of citizen journalists. Initially focused on elections, she investigated the 2004 Ohio election, organizing, training and leading several forays into counties to photograph the 2004 ballots. She officially served at three recounts, including the 2004 recount. She also organized and led the team that audited Franklin County Ohio's 2006 election, proving the number of signatures did not match official results. Her work appears in three books. ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Fantabulous Idea to BLAST THE BLOGOSPHERE

and our Congress and local newspapers... you and Rob really pulled this off in a dramatically successful way.

I'm collecting the essays you posted and expanding it, and will sent the whole ball of wax to my lists.

That inherent uncertainty frame - I was whining to PeopleCount about you asking us to write about NH's primary.  I said, "We've got a lot of questions and no answers."

When Nancy Tobi responded with "We do have a lot of questions. But we will never have answers as long as we have privatized secret vote counting," it finally hit me. That's exactly the point.  Then I suddenly understood, clearly, what Dave Berman's been talking about.

Elites are deliberately setting us up with inherent uncertainty so that "facts" devolve into opinions. 

But, scientifcally, there are a discrete number of ballots, which allows us to have a conclusive outcome - one that is not subject to debate or opinion. Different groups of people can count them and, if done honestly and accurately, all will arrive at the same totals.

When you watch Leon County Election Supervisor Ion Sanchez (in this video) clearly show how optical scan tabulators can be hacked, we must reject their use in public elections.

ENOUGH!  I like EDA's I-Count idea... that is the way to go.  Show up, America.  It only takes 6-8 people per precinct to count your neighbor's votes in 5-6 hours.  Often less.

Thanks for all you do, Joan... what a ride this has been, eh?

by Rady Ananda (127 articles, 289 quicklinks, 37 diaries, 1124 comments) on Thursday, January 10, 2008 at 8:30:04 PM
 


Andi Novick
Northeast Citizens for Responsible Media
www.re-media.org

andi novickAndi Novick
Northeast Citizens for Responsible Media
www.re-media.org

Couldn't do this work without you

 Once again Rady pulls it all together with the supporting documentation and crystal clarity-- sifting through the density of the overwhelming information and focusing a beam on what must be done.  I personally could not do the election integrity work I do without her. 

And since anyone following this work understands that it is only WE the people who can be counted on to count our votes accurately and transparently- we must create a huge citizen volunteer army to do just that.

 Just think if tens of thousands of us were ready to be deployed on election day- into the fields to count the ballots by hand and perhaps conduct citizen exit polls. 

 What if we showed up in droves and said, 'We're here to count-- get that machine out of my way'. 

We need to be organized and mobilized to do what's necessary to guard our ballots, which is why Election Defense Alliance is proposing a national registry of citizen volunteers willing to show up and count. 

see THE "I COUNT CORPS" -- Sign up to take back our elections

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_andi_nov_080110_sign_up_to_take_back.htm

by andi novick (54 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 15 comments) on Thursday, January 10, 2008 at 11:35:56 AM
 


In 2004, Rady Ananda joined the growing community of citizen journalists. Initially focused on elections, she investigated the 2004 Ohio election, organizing, training and leading several forays into counties to photograph the 2004 ballots. She officially served at three recounts, including the 2004 recount. She also organized and led the team that audited Franklin County Ohio's 2006 election, proving the number of signatures did not match official results. Her work appears in three books. ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Rady AnandaIn 2004, Rady Ananda joined the growing community of citizen journalists. Initially focused on elections, she investigated the 2004 Ohio election, organizing, training and leading several forays into counties to photograph the 2004 ballots. She officially served at three recounts, including the 2004 recount. She also organized and led the team that audited Franklin County Ohio's 2006 election, proving the number of signatures did not match official results. Her work appears in three books. ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

I COUNT - Great Project Idea

and thanks for all you do, Andi ~ and Joan and Dave and the other 25 authors I have collected who wrote just about New Hampshire.

I'm compiling a list of articles - which Rob Kall and Joan Brunwasser started with their wonderful idea to blast the blogosphere, and Congress, and the mainstream lamestream press...

thank you so much, Andi, for pulling together that incredibly diverse group of people to file the amicus brief in US vs. NY.  you're my latest hero...

:-) 

by Rady Ananda (127 articles, 289 quicklinks, 37 diaries, 1124 comments) on Thursday, January 10, 2008 at 8:15:01 PM
 

 

9 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

The Controversy Surrounding Obama's Birth by adeeba folami

Radio Treason? Right Wing Talkers Skirted Disclosure Law by Gustav Wynn

Hope You Die Before You Get Old by David Michael Green

"Oops, We Meant $7 TRILLION!" What Hank and Ben Are Up to and How They Plan to Pay for It All by Ellen Brown

If Barack Obama really wants change... by Jeremy Frombach

George W. Bush Belongs In Prison by Joel S. Hirschhorn

10 INDISPENSABLE BROADCAST JOURNALIST'S WORDS/PHRASES by Vince Williams

Can A Neo-conservative Rule Left-of-Center Canada? by dick overfield

Behind the Screwy Obama Birth Certificate Controversy by earl ofari hutchinson

Who Is Killing Us? by Joni Greever

Go To Top 50 Most Popular