Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (7 comments)

2008 Voter Suppression Hangs on Supreme Court Decision

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 2 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

Voter ID disenfranchises low-income and less educated voters (Rock the Vote, et al.; R. Michael Alvarez, et al.)

Voters with less income and education are most affected by voter ID requirements, according to a study co-authored by Alvarez. High school graduates (21%) are more likely to be without valid identification than college graduates (11%), the Washington Institute study reported. The findings are almost identical to statistics on voters without valid ID based on income: those earning less than $40K per year (21.1%) were more likely to be without proper ID compared to those earning $40K-$80K at 12.7%.

Voter ID laws are implemented at the discretion of poll workers and election officials (League of Women Voters; Asian American Legal Defense; R. Michael Alvarez, et al.)

“The Voter ID Law does not define 'conform[ ]'(much less resolve how a voter with several variations of her name should be treated) and it does not explain how the similarity or dissimilarity in likeness of the person pictured on the proof of identification to the prospective voter is to be determined,” the LWV amicus brief noted. “Nor does the Voter ID Law require any specific training in the consistent application of these criteria.”

There are less onerous methods of attaining election integrity ( Professor Rick Hasen; Rep. Ellison; Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, et al.; Brennan Center, Project Vote, et. al)

- Voter ID law is not needed to prevent possible voter fraud. Of the seven states that require photo ID, Indiana and Georgia are the only states that do not provide a “less burdensome” alternative for voters without a photo ID, such as Michigan, which allows voters to sign an affidavit.



- There are other ways for Indiana to achieve its objective through less burdensome means, including adopting the methods of other states that ask for utility bills or match signatures for absentee balloting.

- As a result of the dramatic rise in election administration disputes and the decline in public confidence in the electoral system since 2000, the court should articulate clear and fair standards to resolve election administration disputes, wrote Loyola law professor, Rick Hasen.


If the Supreme Court upholds Crawford, then voting rights advocates should brace for a flood of voter ID bills to be introduced into state legislatures across the country. Project Vote will be tracking these and all election-related laws in states with large populations or histories of election irregularities through our ElectionLegislation.org website.

Also, Rep. Ellison’s bill in Congress would regulate the ability of states to pass and enforce voter ID laws. You may find out more about the bill here and contact Rep. Ellison’s office here.

Finally, if you would like to read the full text of all 24 Crawford v. Marion County Election Board amicus briefs, follow this link.

Quick Links:

Websites and Blogs:

The Brennan Center For Justice

Election Law Blog

ElectionLegislation.org

Project Vote

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

www.projectvote.org

Project Vote is the leading technical assistance and direct service provider to the civic participation community. Since its founding in 1982, Project Vote has provided professional training, management, evaluation (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

It is a foregone conclusion by Charlie L on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2007 at 10:13:12 AM
Seize the Polls by Rady Ananda on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2007 at 11:13:26 AM
If voting could change things ... by Mr M on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2007 at 11:50:16 AM
Here's a proposal by Anthony Signorelli on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2007 at 2:31:33 PM
Powered by unfounded allegations of voter fraud by steve scheetz on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:08:49 PM
Just another reason to by Joel S. Hirschhorn on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:14:30 PM
LEFT UNSAID by tabonsell on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2007 at 5:51:07 PM