OpEdNews - Page 2 of Article: The Voting Literacy Test of the 21st Century

Even SOME intelligent, well educated people in Cary, North Carolina found it confusing. Cary Demographics are unusual, this is a predominently white, educated and upper income community. The City Council website boasts that "This year, 94.3% of the respondents had internet access" But still IRV confused some folks:

Instant runoff gets test run
Cary election previews vote in Hendersonville By Jordan Schrader, October 15, 2007
...When the count ended, Frantz led by a couple of dozen votes, with an official total due Tuesday. Frantz said he wouldn't support another instant-runoff.
Hundreds of people he met left the polls not understanding the system, he said. He prefers an actual runoff with a clear choice of two candidates.
"Even after all this is said and done, none of us got a clear majority," Frantz said.

IRV was "tested" in Hendersonville, NC using touchscreens (anyone say "incentivizing touch-screens?). One voter complained about the confusing ballot, and was bashed by the officials. On October 19, 2007 He told the "Blue Ridge Now" reporter:

"I call it instant confusion"....
He said the elections worker he spoke with didn't seem pleased when he questioned the system. "She acted almost like she was offended, like 'you idiot, can't you figure it out?'" he said.

IRV and its effect on election integrity and transparency

Dr. Rebecca Mercuri Internationally respected computer scientist and e-voting expert warns - "
"IRV and other proportional balloting methods have been proven to incentivize the introduction of electronic ballot tabulation in places where none previously was needed or has existed, and they further complicate what has become an increasingly closed process for the determination of election results.

Since these methods lend themselves to potential "gaming" of the ballot set that may not be independently detectable or auditable, these run-off styles must be prohibited. The present climate of distrust regarding election integrity will only be further undermined by skepticism invoked by increased complexity of alternative balloting methods, especially if the vendors are allowed to continue to obfuscate their vote tabulation products."

More on What They Don't Tell You about IRV:

1)negatively impacts election integrity,
2)increases costs and labor for elections, audits and recounts, making them more onerus,
3)disenfranchises certain segments of the population,
4)does not meet its political promise,
5)does not allow voters 2nd chance to elect their preferred candidate,
6)it does nothing about the problem of ballot access for third parties.

Have a conversation with one of your friends and try to explain to each other how the ballots are counted.

See the instructions here (pdf file)

IRV in Australia and Ireland - third parties are shut out

IRV is more compatible with countries like Australia, or Ireland - that have only 1 or 2 contests on the paper ballot counted by hand. But Australia and Ireland don't vote for lots of contests like we do in the US. They vote for party tickets, or parliament, and then most other offices are appointed.

Even with IRV, Australia's government is dominated by two parties , and Ireland is dominated by one. Third parties are still mostly shut out.

North Carolina doesn't even have "real" IRV, it has a "modified" form that ranks only three candidates and eliminates all but the top two.

Cary, North Carolina's election was a mess, provisional ballots weren't even counted until canvass, after the "first" and "second" rounds, perhaps because the law was so poorly written. Election officials had to back up and re-insert the approved provisionals.

IRV is just a 21st century version of a literacy test.

Learn more at Instant Runoff Voting US

Demand one person, one vote, on paper, publicly audited, no exceptions

1 | 2