|
|
Tags for This Article:
USA United States Of America (7178) Electronic Voting (2841) Voting Integrity (2709) Election-Voting Issues (2068) Voting Technology (1919) Voting Machines (1480) Voting Laws Federal HAVA (1250) Election Reform (1106) Voting Reform (1059) Election Theft (763) Election Law (380) Election Reform HR 550 (242)
|
(more...)
(less...)
Add to My Group
This raises doubt as well on optical scanners, which, as Dr. Dill full well knows, have been the perpetrators of at least as much electoral crime, fraud, and failure as the touch screens he derides in his piece. And while it is true that much of the country has forgotten the lost art of hand counting paper ballots, New Hampshire, with its complex ballots and large jurisdictions (still hand counting up to 3-4-5 times the national average of ballots processed in any given polling place) has proven that the transparent and democratic method of administering hand count paper ballot elections is not only do-able, but is recommended for those truly wishing to create and support community-based, representative democracy and democratic elections. As opposed to the impossibly complex recommendations coming out of Holt’s office and supported by others – with their own private techno-election agendas – who are pushing for more investment into privatized, corporately owned, high tech voting systems, hand count proponents are supporting transparency and public ownership in the entire voting process, which any logical, thinking, patriotic American should agree is a prerequisite for sustaining our democracy. Be this as it may, had Holt’s office put forward a simple bill to mandate paper trails and audits, and if he had kept the bill's language simple enough to identify these as the criteria but to honor state plan processes in enacting the mandates, this bill would likely have received wide scale support even from hand count proponents. In fact, I will make a public proclamation right here and now, that should Congress amend the Holt Bill in this specific manner I will muster every resource I have at my personal disposal to ensure passage of the bill. Instead, Holt’s office put before us a highly complex, 50+ page bill that contains many unacceptable items. I will focus only on two of the unacceptable items in HR 811: 1) huge unfunded mandates, and 2) making permanent the Election Assistance Commission, an executive commission of four White House appointees -- the Commissioners of the Count -- who have absolute power and de facto regulatory control over the entire voting technology industry. Making permanent the EAC, as Holt proposes in his bill, is not, as Dill states, giving the EAC “minimal responsibilities”. By making them permanent, HR 811 is cementing a complete restructuring of the balance of power in our system of government, shifting power over our national election systems from the states, and in times of distress, Congress (a representative body) to the Executive Branch. The cost of these two items alone is too much to bear for the promised Trojan horse of a paper trail. The cost of shifting vote counting control to the White House is incalculable, but suffice to say that centralized control of the vote is what kept Stalin and Sadaam in power, and certainly was the trigger for our own American Revolution and Declaration of Independence. Additionally, the fiscal recklessness and irresponsibility of this bill is staggering. Let’s just look at its mandate for an entirely new text conversion technology for every polling jurisdiction in the nation. This cost could easily arrive at the multibillions. And this is not even addressing the bill’s requirement for two entirely new state functions, those being state audit and certification offices. For states not currently structured with these functions, this is another continuous multimillion dollar unfunded mandate for staffing and operational costs of two new state functions. The truth is this: we are by no means facing Dill's "choice between HR 811 or continuation of our current "Kafka-esque" paperless system ."
Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people: Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers Nancy Tobi is cofounder, former Chair, website editor for Democracy for New Hampshire (DFNH), and Chair of the NH Fair Elections Committee. Nancy is the author of numerous articles on election integrity, including "The Gifts of HAVA: Time to Ask for a Refund," "What's Wrong with the Holt Bill," "We're Counting the Votes: An Election Preparedness Kit," and "Hands-on Elections: An Information Handbook for Running Real Elections, Using Real Paper Ballots, Counted by Real People". Her article about election reform fallacies is included in the April 2008 book "Losers Take All" edited by Mark Crispin Miller. Nancy believes in the principles embodied in our Constitution, and that groups like Election Defense Alliance and DFNH can play a unique role by empowering ordinary people to do extraordinary things.
|
