Even the arrest of Abu Abdullah only occurred after his support for terrorism was widely reported in the British and American media in late August. On 23rd August, he justified the killing of Westerners and told CNN correspondent Dan Rivers that Tony Blair is a "legitimate target" of jihad. The Sunday Times (27.08.06) remarked that he "is apparently being allowed to operate unchecked by the authorities five months after a law was passed making it a criminal offence to glorify terrorism."
Torture may have been used to extract evidence for the weekend police raids which resulted in the arrest of 14 British Muslims, including Abdullah. Sources confirm that information came from detainees in Camp X-Ray in Guantanamo, where interrogation techniques classified as torture under international law are routinely used.
The reluctance to take decisive action against the leadership of the extremist network in the UK has a long history. According to John Loftus, a former Justice Department prosecutor, Omar Bakri and Abu Hamza, as well as the suspected mastermind of the London bombings Haroon Aswat, were all recruited by MI6 in the mid-1990s to draft up British Muslims to fight in Kosovo. American and French security sources corroborate the revelation. The MI6 connection raises questions about Bakri's relationship with British authorities today. Exiled to Lebanon and outside British jurisdiction, he is effectively immune to prosecution.
Other London-based radical clerics with terrorist connections also had a relationship to the security services. Abu Qatada, described as al-Qaeda's European ambassador, was according to French sources a long-time MI5 informant. Pakistani government insiders similarly believe that Ahmed Omar Sheikh Saeed, the British al-Qaeda finance chief from Forest Gate, worked not only with the ISI, Pakistani's military intelligence service, but was also recruited by the CIA as an informant. Saeed, who reportedly wired several hundred thousand dollars to alleged chief 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta, is currently in Pakistani custody for the murder of Wall Street Journal journalist Daniel Pearl.
Omar Bakri regularly uses the internet to communicate with his followers in Britain. On Sunday evening, 3rd September, Omar Bakri told participants in an online chat forum that he had been pulled in by the Lebanese authorities at the request of the US and British governments, and questioned in relation to the "terror plot". Although he denied involvement in the plot, he claimed that some of the 24 British Muslim suspects were known to him. When asked to confirm or deny whether Bakri had indeed been arrested at the request of the British, the Foreign Office had no comment. Bakri said that he was regularly questioned by Lebanese officials on behalf of the British government.
The official reluctance to act against Bakri and his active associates in the UK does not match the government's willingness to act pre-emptively to foil a plot of doubtful reality. Official reluctance to acknowledge the significance of the detonators used in the 7/7 terrorist operation suggests that the threat is far more sophisticated than authorities have admitted, and that emphasis on home-grown amateurs is mistaken. Lt. Col. Wylde's observations suggest that the terror-threat narrative is being manipulated for political expedience.
The evidence shows that the government continues to play political games with the terrorism threat, games that are undermining, not serving, our safety; while consolidating the unaccountable powers of a compromised "security" bureaucracy. What is needed now is not simply to throw more money and power at such a deeply-flawed system, but to hold an independent public inquiry into 7/7 that will facilitate the implementation of reforms that will protect the integrity of our intelligence services.
Thanks to Graham Ennis, Nigel Wylde and Glen Jenvey for their research assistance and contribution to this story. They bear no responsibility for any errors therein. An abridged version of this story will be printed in The Muslim News, UK on 29th September 2006.
When these preposterous claims first reached this forum I posted a paste I googled in about forty five seconds that debunked the ability to make such explosive in an airplane bathroom, citing the critical temperature requirements (real cold) and the need to accurately mix ingredients.
If I could stumble across the chemical engineers claims of the impossibility of this silly plan then I am certain that most of those who sought would have found. Are we so lackadaisical that we no longer care to corroborate opr research or even question? If so we are well and truly screwed!
by
ardee D. (6 articles, 4 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 2377 comments)
on Tuesday, September 19, 2006 at 8:35:04 PM
The right wingers assume that their base is stupid, unthinking, and usually they do pretty well basing their actions and statements on those assumptions.
by
Rob Kall (807 articles, 3921 quicklinks, 332 diaries, 1702 comments)
on Tuesday, September 19, 2006 at 10:19:00 PM
My first thought when they made the arrests in the Uk is if they knew this was in the works for over a year why did they not inform the public of the danger. Are all the intelligence agencies in the UK and the US so nonchalant about a plane load of civilians that they failed to consider if they were watching this cell that their might be others not on their radar that actually had figured out how to do this. Not being a expert I would think a quickly rigged incendiary bomb,a water bottle filled with low odor kerosene might do the trick. Maybe not explode the plane but disable it.,over the ocean. But what the hell do I know .Of course that is the end of any imminent threat, right.!!!
by
cluelessfl (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 184 comments)
on Wednesday, September 20, 2006 at 12:01:15 AM
is that , given the impossibility of creating a liquid explosive in an airplane bathroom, is this nothing but more propaganda to prop up both an ailing Blair regime and a coming Republican uphill climb to remain in power in the Legislature?
by
ardee D. (6 articles, 4 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 2377 comments)
on Wednesday, September 20, 2006 at 5:25:46 PM
4 comments
How would you rate this?
You must be logged in (if signed up) to do ratings.
It's free to signup! And easy. And takes just a minute or two....
Must Read (
Well Said (
News (
Touching (
Funny (
Supported (
Interesting (
Inspiring (
Valuable (
