All the evidence now suggests that the Americans wanted immediate arrests without proper evidence. It seems, there was no imminent necessity of such immediate action, nor was there sufficient evidence of an imminent plot, other than the claims of an informant under torture. There are only two further possibilities. Either there was no real evidence of any plot at all; or these premature arrests could have seriously compromised a long-term surveillance operation against suspects who may have been involved in a wider network involved in terrorist-related activity, an operation that has now been scuppered -- meaning that we may never know for sure what they were actually planning.
Meanwhile, reports of material evidence in the UK have been unnervingly threadbare. Only eleven out of the 24 suspects arrested over the alleged airliner bomb plot have been charged, largely it seems on the basis of police findings of "bomb-making equipment and martyrdom videos". Out of the other thirteen, two have been released without charge. But the "bomb-making equipment" discovery of "chemicals" and "electrical components" is ambiguous at best, especially given that police descriptions of the alleged bomb construction plan is to mix a sports drink with a peroxide-based household gel (the chemicals), and detonate the mixture with an MP3 player or mobile phone (electrical components). If possession of such items makes you a terror suspect in possession of potential bomb-making equipment, then we are all terror suspects. As Craig Murray observes:
"Let me fess up here. I have just checked, and our flat contains nail polish remover, sports drinks, and a variety of household cleaning products. Also MP3 players and mobile phones. So the authorities could announce -- as they have whispered to the media in this case -- that potential ingredients of a liquid bomb, and potential timing devices, have been discovered. It rather lowers the bar doesn't it?"
Yes -- clearly, it lowers the bar to potentially include millions of perfectly normal British citizens. The police story is also, simply, scientifically absurd, as Murray further notes: "The idea that high explosive can be made quickly in a plane toilet by mixing at room temperature some nail polish remover, bleach, and Red Bull and giving it a quick stir, is nonsense." Citing US chemistry experts, Washington-based information security journalist Thomas C. Greene similarly concludes that "... the fabled binary liquid explosive -- that is, the sudden mixing of hydrogen peroxide and acetone with sulfuric acid to create a plane-killing explosion, is out of the question... But the Hollywood myth of binary liquid explosives now moves governments and drives public policy. We have reacted to a movie plot."
CIA, MI6 and ISI
A report by Asia Times Pakistan Bureau Chief Syed Shahzad citing Pakistani intelligence sources confirms that the British-born Pakistanis arrested in Lahore and Karachi were active members of al-Muhajiroun, the banned UK-based extremist Islamist group currently directed by Omar Bakri Mohammed from Lebanon. Moreover, they had been penetrated by Pakistani intelligence services. "I can tell you with surety", said one Pakistani source, "that the boys [recently] arrested in Pakistan have long been identified by the Pakistani establishment." They had come to Pakistan and "interacted with a few officials of the Pakistani army" with a view to stage a coup against the Musharraf regime. Omar Bakri has repeatedly issued fatawas calling for the assassination of Musharraf. In fact:
"Pakistani intelligence -- coming from a strong military background -- penetrated deep into them... The closeness of the Pakistani intelligence with some boys with a Muhajiroun background was a known fact, but at what stage it turned out to be their 'London terror plot', we are completely in the dark. However, I safely make a conjecture that those highly motivated boys were exploited by agents provocateurs. A religious Muslim youth in his early 20s is undoubtedly full of hatred against the US, and if somebody would guide them to carry out any attack on US interests, there would be a strong chance that they would go for that. And I think this is exactly what happened... they were basically [en]trapped."
I have no doubt that these individuals could have been associated with extremist groups. But while it may be possible they were involved in terrorist-related activity, it is now indisputable that there was no evidence of an imminent plot, and the specific claims about the details were obtained from an informant under torture. We should therefore be very cautious in accepting the "Terror Plot" official narrative, as there is clearly a continuing danger of political interference compromising ongoing intelligence investigations for political expedience.
But the deep involvement of the Pakistani ISI in penetrating the very group that was subsequently arrested and tortured, raises serious questions about what was going on. Moreover, the Asia Times also notes that the Pakistani intelligence operation against these groups was coordinated on the initiative of the CIA and MI6. Indeed, MI6 had also ensured that a deep undercover British intelligence operative had "infiltrated the group, giving the authorities intelligence on the alleged plan", according to several US government sources.
The revelation that the arrestees were associated with al-Muhajiroun also raises serious intelligence issues. Omar Bakri Mohammed, the leader of the group, which recently operated under the names of the Saved Sect and al-Ghuraaba, was recruited by MI6 in the mid-1990s to recruit British Muslims to fight in Kosovo. Despite being implicated in the 7/7 London bombings, the British government exiled him to Lebanon where he resides safely outside of British jurisdiction, and thus effectively immune from investigation and prosecution. One inevitably wonders about the nature of Bakri's corrupt relationship with British intelligence services today.
P2OG: Stimulating Reactions
So what were the CIA, MI6 and ISI doing? Given the disturbing context here, in which the entire "Terror Plot" narrative has obviously been deeply politicized and to some extent even fabricated, a balanced analysis needs to account precisely for the stated new "counter-terror" strategies of western intelligence services. In August 2002, a report by the Pentagon's Defense Science Board revealed the latest strategic thinking about creating a new US secret counterintelligence organization -- the Proactive Preemptive Operations Group (P2OG) -- which would, among other things, conduct highly clandestine operations to "stimulate reactions" among terrorist groups, by infiltrating them or provoking them into action in order to facilitate targeting them. In January 2005, Seymour Hersh revealed in the New Yorker that the P2OG strategy had been activated:
"Under Rumsfeld's new approach, I was told, US military operatives would be permitted to pose abroad as corrupt foreign businessmen seeking to buy contraband items that could be used in nuclear-weapons systems. In some cases, according to the Pentagon advisers, local citizens could be recruited and asked to join up with guerrillas or terrorists. This could potentially involve organizing and carrying out combat operations, or even terrorist activities."
Hersh refers to a series of articles by John Arquilla, a professor of defense analysis at the Naval Postgraduate School, in Monterey, California, and a RAND terrorism consultant, where he elaborates on this strategy of "countering terror" with Pseudo-Terror. "When conventional military operations and bombing failed to defeat the Mau Mau insurgency in Kenya in the 1950s," muses professor Arquilla, "the British formed teams of friendly Kikuyu tribesmen who went about pretending to be terrorists. These 'pseudo gangs', as they were called, swiftly threw the Mau Mau on the defensive, either by befriending and then ambushing bands of fighters or by guiding bombers to the terrorists' camps." He goes on to advocate that western intelligence services should use the British case as a model for creating new "pseudo gang" terrorist groups, purportedly to undermine "real" terror networks. "What worked in Kenya a half-century ago has a wonderful chance of undermining trust and recruitment among today's terror networks. Forming new pseudo gangs should not be difficult." He then confidently observes about John Walker Lindh, the young American lad who joined the Taliban before 9/11: "If a confused young man from Marin County can join up with Al Qaeda, think what professional operatives might do."
Hmmm....
I'm thinking about it, and I'm looking at the deep intelligence penetration of al-Qaeda affiliated networks like al-Muhajiroun by the CIA, MI6 and ISI, and unfortunately I'm not experiencing the same sense of elation as Arquilla. Is the 10/8 "Terror Plot" connected to the post-9/11 P2OG strategy?
When the intelligence services of a country are misused in order to provide false information to hoodwink the population, then it is time for the members of those services to pull the plug on their political bosses.
Similarly, when the media of a country are then used to misinform and mislead the population, it is high time for the population to turf out all those responsible and replace them with information sources that can be trusted to tell them the truth.
Who the hell do the political 'bosses' think they are to fail so shamefully those who elect them to be their representatives?
Britain is in the hands of manipulative crooks who serve alien interests and are running the show for their own grubby financial ends. It is about time they were thrown out of office and into prison where they all belong.
In fact, looking at the world today, there are quite a few countries where the same prescription applies.
by
amazin (31 articles, 0 quicklinks, 10 diaries, 377 comments)
on Tuesday, August 22, 2006 at 11:25:49 AM
I'm sure that the C.I.A. has several shills sitting in Arabic "chat rooms" inciting them to violence for the purpose of capturing hypothetical terrorists
by
mattzcat (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 58 comments)
on Tuesday, August 22, 2006 at 12:33:53 PM
In 1952-1953 in Russia there was suddenly announced that a group of terrorist doctors were disclosed by 'an honest ciizen' to the govt. Those doctors allegedly wanted to poison the govt officials and had already poisoned some. Many very prominent doctors were promptly arrested and surely they all (or most of them) confessed. The plan was to hang them at the Red Square publicly. All of them were called terrorists( actually they were proclaimed to be members of the powerful Jewish terrorist organization) and also it was told that many more like them were hiding in the clinics where they poisoned people on the regular basis. Hundreds if not thousands of doctors, primarily of Jewish descent were fired or exiled. Rumour said it was only a start. A woman who 'disclosed' the plot was awarded a highest order. But suddenly the dictator died. And in about a month or so it was quitely announced that the ' Doctors Plot' was a sham. The ones who survived torture were released. That woman- snitch, her award was taken back. And the chief interrogator was shot by firing squad.
Folks, I sincerely hope that when we here in the US and in Britain will get rid of all those shitheads who are now in power and we get to the bottom of those schemes they had concocted we will have a trial and they all will get what they deserve. I only hope that those innocent who are now being victims of all that bloody abuse will be there with us when the day comes. It came in Russia and it will come for us too.
by
Mark Sashine (46 articles, 19 quicklinks, 235 diaries, 3359 comments)
on Tuesday, August 22, 2006 at 2:49:45 PM
"A religious Muslim youth in his early 20s is undoubtedly full of hatred against the US, and if somebody would guide them to carry out any attack on US interests, there would be a strong chance that they would go for that."
That is a scary statement. Makes you think perhaps
profiling is a smart way of securing the safety of the
masses. Stop and search those that are known to want to do
harm. Seems simple, and logical.
by
sbaker (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 108 comments)
on Tuesday, August 22, 2006 at 4:16:57 PM
'Every problem has a simple solution. Usually wrong'
HL Menchken
I can only say: try it on yourself. Let someone single you out and profile you and your family. See how it feels. And I bet if you had no bad feelings about your government before that those feelings will appear very quickly if you become the target. See what logic will satisfy you in that case.
by
Mark Sashine (46 articles, 19 quicklinks, 235 diaries, 3359 comments)
on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 at 9:05:34 AM
